• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Anomolies at ground zero

Docker said:
I said thermonuclear bombs was garbage. I think what happened to these cars is odd.
Click to expand...

Massive skyscrapers fall and unleash holy hell on the ground. Counter -intuitive outcomes are to be expected. I'd like to see a map showing where these cars were in relation to the buildings.
 
Docker said:
Would you care to debunk Jowenko's quote, boss?
Click to expand...

I can do the abridged version:

He was shown a short video clip and says that before he's even aware that the building is WTC7. As the interview progresses he becomes increasingly confused and bewildered as he learns more about the building, such as when he's told it happens on the same day as the other two fell and that it is on fire. He knew very little to nothing about the building when he was shown the video, so it's definately suspect.

Also, if you watch the Jowenko video where he comments on WTC1 and 2 he says that CD simply isn't possible in the building conditions because the heat and fire would destroy the blasting caps and explosives. The building conditions were very similar, so why would he say it's possible in one and not the other.

I believe he was taken advantage of and the video shown under suspicious circumstances. He also refuses to comment further.

There's probably more to say, but that's adequate for me considering there hasn't been one CD expert to agree with him from any part of the world that I'm aware of.
 
Jowenko is a top European Demolitions Expert, is he not. he said that in his opinion, watching Video Footage only, that the WTC 1 & 2 were NOT brought down by CD, and that WTC 7 looked like it was CD.

At the time he made his original comments, he was not told of the fires or the damage done to the WTC 7. He was given NO DETAILS at all, merely asked to comment on what he thought was the cause of a building collapsing on the video.

TAM
 
Docker said:
Would you care to debunk Jowenko's quote, boss?
Click to expand...

Jowenko stated that he suspected the towers were not brought down by CD. He stated that WTC7 was a CD after looking at pictures of the building without knowing what they were pictures of, when or where they were taken. He then stood by his statement because, as he explained, there were government offices in WTC7. He then got inundated with questions from all over the globe because he remains the only demolitions expert who has ever indicated that there was any likelihood that any of the WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolition.

After that, he clammed up. He will not give interviews and will not answer questions about his opinion. He hasn't retracted it but he won't even discuss it anymore.

For an expert witness, his is not very strong testimony.
 
T.A.M. said:
Yes the question is were the cars near the towers, then the wreckage of the cars moved to another locale, and hence where these picks were taken?
Click to expand...
That's true with the cop car. The photo was taken after it was moved across town near the East River.
 
gumboot said:
That's one of the more retarded things I have ever heard.

Of course, the presence of digital video footage of the WTC impacts and collapses proves it was not a nuclear device, but never mind.


It's also worth mentioning nuclear blasts have enormously massive shockwaves. Neutron warheads are significant because the actual fireball and blast area is much smaller, with higher radiation levels destroying electronics and killing people. I'm not aware that radiation alone from a nuclear blast will set cars outside the blast area alight.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

I did hear about some increased lymphoma rates among the clear up people.

No I don't have a source
 
Loss Leader said:
Jowenko stated that he suspected the towers were not brought down by CD. He stated that WTC7 was a CD after looking at pictures of the building without knowing what they were pictures of, when or where they were taken. He then stood by his statement because, as he explained, there were government offices in WTC7. He then got inundated with questions from all over the globe because he remains the only demolitions expert who has ever indicated that there was any likelihood that any of the WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolition.

After that, he clammed up. He will not give interviews and will not answer questions about his opinion. He hasn't retracted it but he won't even discuss it anymore.

For an expert witness, his is not very strong testimony.
Click to expand...

The fact he clams up proves the pressure experts are under to stick to the official story
 
The cop car is crushed from the top. Suggesting something fell on it, from above.
 
Docker said:
I did hear about some increased lymphoma rates among the clear up people.

No I don't have a source
Click to expand...


A neutron bomb would have killed thousands upon thousands of people instantly. Every single digital camera anywhere near the WTC would have fried itself. The police and news helicopters around the site would have suffered catastrophic system failures.

Need I go on?

-Gumboot
 
Docker said:
Would you care to debunk Jowenko's quote, boss?
Click to expand...
The one in which he said the towers were definitely not brought down by explosives, or the one in which he said WTC 7 was demolished because of the sensitive information stored inside?

Docker.

I asked you to read my paper on WTC 7. Do not bring it up with me until you do. As I've already told you, I'm not here to repeat myself. Fair enough?

Now how about providing the evidence that's required to support your claims in the other threads you started?
 
T.A.M. said:
Jowenko is a top European Demolitions Expert, is he not. he said that in his opinion, watching Video Footage only, that the WTC 1 & 2 were NOT brought down by CD, and that WTC 7 looked like it was CD.

At the time he made his original comments, he was not told of the fires or the damage done to the WTC 7. He was given NO DETAILS at all, merely asked to comment on what he thought was the cause of a building collapsing on the video.

TAM
Click to expand...

He is an expert, I have no reason to disbelieve him.

NIST dont know why 7 collapsed.
 
Docker said:
Well the point is that these cars were not near the towers, they werent hit by anything and didn't catch fire.
Click to expand...
Were you following all these cars around that morning? Do you have video of them not getting hit by anything and not catching fire? I only trust video.

And correct me if I'm wrong, but that one police car certainly looks like something came crashing down on top of it. Unless the NYPD was going with the whole "concave-roof-doors-won't-latch" motif in 2001.
 
Docker said:
I did hear about some increased lymphoma rates among the clear up people.

No I don't have a source
Click to expand...

Military Weapons Scientist: "Sir! We've finally perfected and tested our newest civilization-destroying bomb! The damage it causes is incredible!"

General: "Excellent! What is the damage caused by the weapon?"

Military Weapons Scientist: "It increases lymphoma rates."

General: "..."
 
I think Dr. Evil accidently directed the energy beam directly at those cars, his arm probably got bumped while he was taking the towers down floor by floor. Probably explains why he left some core standing too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom