Annoying creationists

[I less than three logic]

Is a mean old creationist ganging up on all you poor evolutionarians? How unfair of me. At least your grammar is showing some improvement.

I guarantee that this discussion has not given me any sexual gratification; however your latest theory is an improvement over the theory of evolution.

This is yet another empty post that does nothing to advance or support your argument. If you truly think these ideas of yours are correct and have any interest whatsoever in advancing your ideas academically, then I highly recommend you work extremely hard in convincing at least one person that can hold a rational debate to take up the fight for you. The last 20 or so pages have proven beyond any doubt that you are utterly incompetent in this department. As long as you’re at the helm of this idea it is doomed to sit idle on forums such as this earning no more respect than any other idea being propagated by an internet troll.

 

[kjkent1]

Oh, so his icon which says he needs a drink is a joke? I’ve used my actual ID on this and every site I have posted, unlike most of the hooded evolutionarians on this and other sites on which I have raised this issue.

Now why don’t you do your homework for your own little marketing plan and maybe you can find a way out of your cubicle you lazy, greedy Dilbert.

I don't know what a lazy, greedy Dilbert is, so my response to this is <shrug>.

To your use of your "actual" ID, this is meaningless to me, as well. If you want to clearly identify yourself to me in this forum, that will be great.

As far as your substantive comments are concerned, I'll continue to wait for the other, more knowledgeable parties to respond. There's no purpose served by my trying to argue with you on the science.

 

[kleinman]

Annoying Creationists

I don't know what a lazy, greedy Dilbert is, so my response to this is <shrug>.

To your use of your "actual" ID, this is meaningless to me, as well. If you want to clearly identify yourself to me in this forum, that will be great.

As far as your substantive comments are concerned, I'll continue to wait for the other, more knowledgeable parties to respond. There's no purpose served by my trying to argue with you on the science.

Here is an example of how you are lazy. If you were to read this thread and the Evolutionisdead thread on this topic, you would have my first and last names, and my educational background and training, but you are too lazy to read these threads. I have already told you why you are a greedy Dilbert. I now add inattentive to your description.

As far as finding more knowledgeable parties on ev, you have Paul who is now talking about magic, Myriad who has gone off into some sexual gratification discussion and Dr Schneider who is cowering over at the National Cancer Institute. Good luck in finding your more knowledgeable parties.

 

[kjkent1]

Here is an example of how you are lazy. If you were to read this thread and the Evolutionisdead thread on this topic, you would have my first and last names, and my educational background and training, but you are too lazy to read these threads. I have already told you why you are a greedy Dilbert. I now add inattentive to your description.

As far as finding more knowledgeable parties on ev, you have Paul who is now talking about magic, Myriad who has gone off into some sexual gratification discussion and Dr Schneider who is cowering over at the National Cancer Institute. Good luck in finding your more knowledgeable parties.

That was a terrific demonstration of your lack of talent for sarastic comedy. Don't quit your day job.

It was also, entirely non-responsive.

If you want to ID yourself, then do so. Otherwise, don't. If you want to prove your theories, send me a pro forma underwriten by a credible scientist (maybe you are such a scientist), and I'll try to get you the resources.

Otherwise, I'll just assume that you're afraid your hypothesis will ultimately be falsified.

 

[Eternal Gaijin]

Sometimes these annoying creationists just piss me off:

http://www.evolutionisdead.com/foru...70&sid=3406e76df02b7fb9f60af262a63c3a63#11670

~~ Paul

How do you even pick the most annoying?
The groupthink they chuck around and accuse others of is amazing. (Looking at you, AiG)

 

[kleinman]

Annoying Creationists

Here is an example of how you are lazy. If you were to read this thread and the Evolutionisdead thread on this topic, you would have my first and last names, and my educational background and training, but you are too lazy to read these threads. I have already told you why you are a greedy Dilbert. I now add inattentive to your description.

If you want to ID yourself, then do so. Otherwise, don't. If you want to prove your theories, send me a pro forma underwriten by a credible scientist (maybe you are such a scientist), and I'll try to get you the resources.

Otherwise, I'll just assume that you're afraid your hypothesis will ultimately be falsified.

If you can’t get my name and scientific background off these threads you don’t have the skills to get the resources to run the larger problems with ev. I am not worried about being falsified. I’m also not in any hurry either; I’m enjoying annoying evolutionarians by twisting their evolutionary tales.

 

[kjkent1]

If you can’t get my name and scientific background off these threads you don’t have the skills to get the resources to run the larger problems with ev. I am not worried about being falsified. I’m also not in any hurry either; I’m enjoying annoying evolutionarians by twisting their evolutionary tales.

You're entitled to your opinion -- worthless as it may be.

 

[I less than three logic]

I’m also not in any hurry either; I’m enjoying annoying evolutionarians by twisting their evolutionary tales.

So you’re admitting you’re just a troll then? I’m afraid I can’t say I’m surprised.

 

[Paul C. Anagnostopoulos]

I don’t know, why don’t you run a few more points in this series and see if you can refute my assertions.

Hazaaa! Marvelous!! Now they are only assertions. The truth be out!

~~ Paul

 

[kleinman]

Annoying Creationists

I’m also not in any hurry either; I’m enjoying annoying evolutionarians by twisting their evolutionary tales.

So you’re admitting you’re just a troll then? I’m afraid I can’t say I’m surprised.

I told you to stay away from the entrance to my cave.

I don’t know, why don’t you run a few more points in this series and see if you can refute my assertions.

Hazaaa! Marvelous!! Now they are only assertions. The truth be out!

What’s the matter, you don’t like the word assertion? Feel free to substitute any of the following synonyms; declaration, statement, claim, allegation, contention, argument. It doesn’t matter whether you run some more points from your series. When the computing resources become available, I will run the cases and the truth be out about ev. I love co-opting evolutionarian ideas, the only problem is there are so few worth co-opting.

 

[Paul C. Anagnostopoulos]

What’s the matter, you don’t like the word assertion? Feel free to substitute any of the following synonyms; declaration, statement, claim, allegation, contention, argument.

Those words are all fine, too. Until now, you had been talking as if you had proof.

~~ Paul

 

[kleinman]

Annoying Creationists

What’s the matter, you don’t like the word assertion? Feel free to substitute any of the following synonyms; declaration, statement, claim, allegation, contention, argument.

Those words are all fine, too. Until now, you had been talking as if you had proof.

The only proof I have are more than 200 different cases with a variety of different input parameters from ev against the Dr Schneider’s single published case and perhaps the hundred or so cases that you and Myriad have posted that show the same results that my cases show. I understand it is not a very strong case for evolutionarians but you have to play the hand you are dealt. Actually, most of the truth is already out on ev, the only thing remaining to be shown is whether increasing population can rescue your theory. I doubt it will but this little bit of unknown gives a reason to continue this discussion (aside from the joy I experience in annoying evolutionarians).

 

[joobz]

The only proof I have are more than 200 different cases with a variety of different input parameters from ev against the Dr Schneider’s single published case and perhaps the hundred or so cases that you and Myriad have posted that show the same results that my cases show. I understand it is not a very strong case for evolutionarians but you have to play the hand you are dealt. Actually, most of the truth is already out on ev, the only thing remaining to be shown is whether increasing population can rescue your theory. I doubt it will but this little bit of unknown gives a reason to continue this discussion (aside from the joy I experience in annoying evolutionarians).

Oh, that's interesting. Because everything I've seen posted here has completely and totally contridicted your opinion. But then again, you do have thermodynamic evidence.

 

[Paul C. Anagnostopoulos]

Actually, most of the truth is already out on ev, the only thing remaining to be shown is whether increasing population can rescue your theory.

So now you're back to claiming you have proof.

Nothing new here, I guess.

~~ Paul

 

[kleinman]

Annoying Creationists

Actually, most of the truth is already out on ev, the only thing remaining to be shown is whether increasing population can rescue your theory.

So now you're back to claiming you have proof.

Nothing new here, I guess.

You’re the only one who has had to back pedal on your claims. I have never abandoned my claims. You are just working too hard parsing words looking for a way out of the mathematical vise that Dr Schneider has put the theory of evolution in with his ev model.

 

[Paul C. Anagnostopoulos]

You’re the only one who has had to back pedal on your claims. I have never abandoned my claims. You are just working too hard parsing words looking for a way out of the mathematical vise that Dr Schneider has put the theory of evolution in with his ev model.

There's a world of difference between "see if you can refute my assertions" and "actually, most of the truth is already out." Unless, of course, you're just a slob with words.

~~ Paul

 

[kleinman]

Annoying Creationists

You’re the only one who has had to back pedal on your claims. I have never abandoned my claims. You are just working too hard parsing words looking for a way out of the mathematical vise that Dr Schneider has put the theory of evolution in with his ev model.

There's a world of difference between "see if you can refute my assertions" and "actually, most of the truth is already out." Unless, of course, you're just a slob with words.

I can’t tell which I enjoy more, annoying you or watching you squirm.

 

[articulett]

My theory is that Kleinman has an orgasm every time he reads a post proving him wrong. This makes him the happiest man on earth.

Respectfully,
Myriad

Oh. Well then, that explains it. And for now, that's the explanation that fits the data best.

but wait...does that mean...that...ewww...I feel so dirty.

 

[kleinman]

Annoying Creationists

My theory is that Kleinman has an orgasm every time he reads a post proving him wrong. This makes him the happiest man on earth.

Respectfully,
Myriad

Oh. Well then, that explains it. And for now, that's the explanation that fits the data best.

but wait...does that mean...that...ewww...I feel so dirty.

The only explanation is that this was all genetically predetermined. I can’t help it, I was born this way. You better not discriminate against us creationists, or we’ll have kjkent1 get his lawyers after you.

Articullet, take a bath and stop arousing yourself on this most serious matter.

 

[cyborg]

Articullet, take a bath and stop arousing yourself on this most serious matter.

SHAME ON YOU ARTICULLET!

This is some serious ****! Souls are at stake here - right kleinman?