Anne Coulter debates Lawrence O'Donnell this weekend

[RandFan]

As a reminder, John O'Neill is someone who served his country honorably, came back to the US and graduated first in his class at UT law school, served as a Supreme Court clerk, represented small investors in litigation claims defrauded by large firms, and donated a kidney to save his wife's life.

So if he lied then it's okay?

O'Donnell's the creep here.

Because he pointed out that O'Neill lied?

 

[UnrepentantSinner]

Is this being aired or will we have to wait for it on The Last Word or C-SPAN?

 

[thaiboxerken]

Unsure.

 

[carlitos]

Unsure.

Kind of like you're unsure of how to spell Ann Coulter's first name?

I can't stand these two either, but watching them debate could be entertaining. Like watching a dogfight or global thermonuclear war.

 

[thaiboxerken]

I don't see what's not to like about Lawrence.

 

[carlitos]

Of course you don't.

 

[thaiboxerken]

Of course you don't.

Feel free to elaborate. Lawrence is very articulette, brings facts to the table and makes eloquent arguments.

 

[RandFan]

Feel free to elaborate. Lawrence is very articulette, brings facts to the table and makes eloquent arguments.

When I was a Conservative Lawrence was one of the first and few liberal commentators I liked listening to.

 

[carlitos]

I haven't really listened to him since the 2004 insane "liar" meltdown that Brainster linked. I try not to watch the talking head shows on cable. Maybe I'll give MSNBC another try as the election heats up, but they always seemed like a liberal version of Fox to me, which isn't what I'm looking for in general.

 

[Unabogie]

Carlitos, the liberal version of Fox is Democracy Now.

Any channel that gives Joe Scarborough three hours a day cannot be the liberal version of Fox.

 

[varwoche]

I haven't really listened to him since the 2004 insane "liar" meltdown that Brainster linked. I try not to watch the talking head shows on cable. Maybe I'll give MSNBC another try as the election heats up, but they always seemed like a liberal version of Fox to me, which isn't what I'm looking for in general.

I cut him a little bit of slack seeing as John O'Neill is indeed a world class liar.

 

[TimCallahan]

So, now that March 4 has come and gone, did anyone see the debate? If you did see it, who do you think won?

 

[Lurker]

I'm not a huge Coulter fan, and that was definitely one of her less acceptable comments, right up there with the bit about how Tim McVeigh should have blown up the NY Times building.

Don't forget Coulter joking about poisoning a Supreme Court Justice (a liberal one of course). Definitely one of her less acceptable comments.

 

[Bri]

I didn't see the debate, but here's a recap:

http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/05/coulter-and-odonnell-face-off-in-live-debate/

-Bri

 

[Kopji]

...She has also said — told the British press — that women in this country, and this is very self-sacrificing of her, should not be allowed to vote. She was asked by the Guardian in 2003, ‘Who shouldn’t have the vote’ and I am going to quote word for word here so there is no confusion, answer, and this is a quotation: ‘It’s true. It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 – except Goldwater in ’64 – the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted,’” O’Donnell quoted Coulter.

“Would you miss voting?” Senso asked Coulter.

“If the rest of my gender doesn’t vote I wouldn’t miss it at all,” she said to boos.

Unfazed, Coulter took any and every opportunity during the uneventful question and answer period to remind the rowdy crowd that, in her opinion they — as college students, the majority under 26 — really should not be voting.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/05/coulter-and-odonnell-face-off-in-live-debate/#ixzz1oIymv9rY

Seems whimsically paradoxical. It is all our fault she is what she is. She would be peacefully at home cooking barefoot in the kitchen if only we saw things her way.

 

[keale]

Im shocked she said this

O’Donnell said he preferred universal coverage like Medicare, or as moderator Frank Sesno called it, “socialized medicine.”

“Yeah, you can call it that. It is the single most efficient health care delivery system in the world. Not in the United States — in the world,” O’Donnell added.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/05/coulter-and-odonnell-face-off-in-live-debate/#ixzz1oJ7CQyyE

 

[UnrepentantSinner]

Based upon O'Donnell's recap tonight, Coulter was her usual Enfent Terrible and still doesn't understand why her attempts at social satire via "comedy" aren't received better by her audience.

And she is an attractive woman period, all the more so for her age, and I can't decide if the crazy makes her hotter or less so.

 

[Ausmerican]

....And she is an attractive woman period, all the more so for her age, and I can't decide if the crazy makes her hotter or less so.

There is no such thing as an attractive woman period.
Tastes differ too wildly for there to be any such universal standard.
If there were I think Halle Berry, Salma Hayek or Cindy Crawford would be closer to the ...period... ending than Ann Coulter. I dont find her attractive either physically (eat a few sandwiches) or facially but understand why others would.

Of course, a persons behaviour and mind also factors into their attractiveness and while Coulter may have a intellectual mind, the thoughts it seems to harbor and that her mouth regularly espouses combine to make her hideous IMHO.

 

[thaiboxerken]

I haven't really listened to him since the 2004 insane "liar" meltdown that Brainster linked. I try not to watch the talking head shows on cable. Maybe I'll give MSNBC another try as the election heats up, but they always seemed like a liberal version of Fox to me, which isn't what I'm looking for in general.

I don't consider it a meltdown to actually call a person out on his lie.

 

[RandFan]

There is no such thing as an attractive woman period.

So long as you accept that there is no such thing as aesthetic ideals then I completely agree.