• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Anne Coulter debates Lawrence O'Donnell this weekend

thaiboxerken

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Sep 17, 2001
Messages
34,530
I look forward to watching this. I have to wonder if Anne actually has debating skills. It seems to me that she only has the ability say vile and hateful things, pandering to her audience. This may turn out to be a "debate" about as productive as the Creationist vs Science debates.
 
Details will be posted as soon as I know. I'm watching "The Last Word" now and he's to give those details in a segment soon.
 
Sunday night, for 1.5 hours, at George Washington University.

It's a charity event and the debate will be over various topics. Lawrence specifically mentioned Anne's taunt of "Where's Osama?" towards the Obama administration before Obama took care of it.
 
Ahhhh I wondered why there was no linkage or anything. Think they'll stream or tubify it?
 
Oh, I think she's smart. She's making tons of money from people with no brains, though.
 
I can't stand listening to either of them for even five minutes. 1.5 hours of listening to the two of them go back and forth sounds like hellish torture to me.
 
I would never call O'Donnell a faggot. A shrieking harpy, maybe.

I was talking about Ann Coulter and her "classy" comment about John Edwards*.

Would you like me to list more "classy" comments about people Ann has averred in the past? You can do the same with O'Donnell and we'll see which list is longer.




* John Edwards is a {insert insult here} extrordinaire, but is schoolyard crap like "faggot" acceptable to you?
 
I've never seen Anne Coulter in an actual lengthy debate, but I'd be willing to bet she has good debating skills. The "look what offensive things you've said!" angle plays right into her hands, because you're not saying she's wrong about anything, just that you're offended by some mean words she said one time. She's intellectually dishonest and full of backwards, ridiculous viewpoints, but she's also quick-witted and capable of logical thinking.

For example, Jeremy Paxman of the BBC has humiliated guests on more than one occasion. Clearly that was his intention in this interview with Anne Coulter, but she handled it perfectly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aiHbUplz3k
 
Oh and I've not seen enough of Lawrence O'Donnell to have much of an opinion. I guess he's one of those MSNBC clowns who tries to pick fights with people like Coulter and Limbaugh, because they know people want newstainment?
 
I was talking about Ann Coulter and her "classy" comment about John Edwards*.

Would you like me to list more "classy" comments about people Ann has averred in the past? You can do the same with O'Donnell and we'll see which list is longer.

* John Edwards is a {insert insult here} extrordinaire, but is schoolyard crap like "faggot" acceptable to you?

I'm not a huge Coulter fan, and that was definitely one of her less acceptable comments, right up there with the bit about how Tim McVeigh should have blown up the NY Times building.
 
Sure. Like anyone believes that. Just give it some time.

Good for O'Donnell.

As a reminder, John O'Neill is someone who served his country honorably, came back to the US and graduated first in his class at UT law school, served as a Supreme Court clerk, represented small investors in litigation claims defrauded by large firms, and donated a kidney to save his wife's life.

O'Donnell's the creep here.
 

Back
Top Bottom