Ed Anecdote to liberal reverse racism

[A Laughing Baby]

Consider the riots and cities burned after the assassination of Mlk.

In response to what, again? Oh, that's right, the hate-motivated violent killing of a man driven toward a peaceful resolution to the simmering racial tensions of that era. Not a man being elected.

Consider the Watts riots of 1965 -- a large-scale riot which lasted 5 days in the Watts neighborhood of Los Angeles, California, in August 1965. By the time the riot subsided, 34 people had been killed, 1,032 injured, and 3,438 arrested. It was the most severe riot in Los Angeles history until the Los Angeles riots of 1992

In response to what, again? Oh, that's right, the violent beating of a man at the hands of a police force and the later exoneration of the men doing the beating, which the rioters viewed as a perpetuation of a violent system lacking justice for social and racial underclasses. Not a man being elected.

Consider the intimidation by the New Black Panthers in the last election.

Two guys from a fringe group that literally everyone says is crazy and a non-factor in modern politics standing outside an election center, being crazy and later being prosecuted for it? That's large-scale enough to translate into "there will be riots if a man is elected?" Okay. Cool. By that logic, then, the next time an explicitly pro-choice candidate is elected, there will be riots because a guy shot George Tiller.

Consider the recent days of rioting and rage of
"Educators" and other government unions in Madision, Wis.

Show me a riot from there. Those were large scale protests, not riots. No more of a riot than any Tea Party rally was (that is to say, it wasn't). While you're at it, explain your use of scare quotes.

And GWB wasn't a divider and didn't talk like this:

“They’ve got a war, they got a war with us and there’s only going to be one winner. It’s going to be the workers of Michigan, and America. We’re going to win that war. President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march. Let’s take these son of bitches out." -- Jimmy Hoffa, Jr.

That's cool. Show me where Jimmy Hoffa, Jr. was elected President, and I'll consider your comparison worth anything whatsoever. Because if we're allowed to compare pundits to Presidents, then you're in for a treat.

Get a better argument. You're basing everything off fantasy or just making things up. I'm assuming I'm being trolled, but on the off chance I'm not, then you really need to evaluate your positions. You can make a good start by realizing that A does not equal B, and perhaps comparing A to B is not a valid or worthwhile endeavor.

 

[varwoche]

Ad hominem attacks betray a lack of facts and an argument without merit..

Your musings are so entirely divorced from reality that you leave no facts to rebut. If you want to start over, somehow fine tune your point so that it's within vague shouting distance of arguablity, and most importantly, cite some credible supporting examples, I'll be glad to consider what you have to say.

And if you attempt the part I bolded, it might even cause you to realize a thing or two about the truly impressive degree of BS you've foisted on this thread, pulled from your vivid imagination or some other dark crack.

 

[Random]

And GWB wasn't a divider and didn't talk like this:

“They’ve got a war, they got a war with us and there’s only going to be one winner. It’s going to be the workers of Michigan, and America. We’re going to win that war. President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march. Let’s take these son of bitches out." -- Jimmy Hoffa, Jr.

Actually, the quote was:

President Obama this is your army. We are ready to march. And president Obama we want one thing: Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. That's what we’re going to tell him. He’s going to be - and when he sees what we’re doing here he will be inspired. But he needs help and you know what? Everybody here's got to vote. If we go back and keep the eye on the prize, let's take these sons of a bitches out and give America back to America where we belong! Thank you very much!

 

[Alferd_Packer]

The last sight the good capitalists of the world will ever see is the incomprehensibly vast ocean of tails--not wagging, never wagging--sprawling into the distance, filling city streets. It will be impossible to tell if the panting you hear is from your own terrified breathing or the endless clot of Dog Soldiers, rows and regiments of death and godless socialism. This is how the world ends--not with a bang, but with a whimper, indeed.

Hah! I have the secret weapon.

Behold, the MK II Frisbee!

Go get it boy!

 

[Robert Prey]

Your musings are so entirely divorced from reality that you leave no facts to rebut. If you want to start over, somehow fine tune your point so that it's within vague shouting distance of arguablity, and most importantly, cite some credible supporting examples, I'll be glad to consider what you have to say.

And if you attempt the part I bolded, it might even cause you to realize a thing or two about the truly impressive degree of BS you've foisted on this thread, pulled from your vivid imagination or some other dark crack.

Zzzzzz. That's all you got. Just more BS. It is you who has zero facts in support of anything. Typical liberal.

 

[Robert Prey]

In response to what, again? Oh, that's right, the hate-motivated violent killing of a man driven toward a peaceful resolution to the simmering racial tensions of that era. Not a man being elected.



In response to what, again? Oh, that's right, the violent beating of a man at the hands of a police force and the later exoneration of the men doing the beating, which the rioters viewed as a perpetuation of a violent system lacking justice for social and racial underclasses. Not a man being elected.



Two guys from a fringe group that literally everyone says is crazy and a non-factor in modern politics standing outside an election center, being crazy and later being prosecuted for it? That's large-scale enough to translate into "there will be riots if a man is elected?" Okay. Cool. By that logic, then, the next time an explicitly pro-choice candidate is elected, there will be riots because a guy shot George Tiller.



Show me a riot from there. Those were large scale protests, not riots. No more of a riot than any Tea Party rally was (that is to say, it wasn't). While you're at it, explain your use of scare quotes.



That's cool. Show me where Jimmy Hoffa, Jr. was elected President, and I'll consider your comparison worth anything whatsoever. Because if we're allowed to compare pundits to Presidents, then you're in for a treat.

Get a better argument. You're basing everything off fantasy or just making things up. I'm assuming I'm being trolled, but on the off chance I'm not, then you really need to evaluate your positions. You can make a good start by realizing that A does not equal B, and perhaps comparing A to B is not a valid or worthwhile endeavor.

It's the Makers versus the Takers. When the Takers are upset, or don't get what they want, they typically riot. If the Anointed One loses the next election, unless it is to another Black man, the police will be out in force the next day in anticipation of the obvious, the same as they would be if Detroit lost in the NBA finals.

 

[Upchurch]

Zzzzzz. That's all you got. Just more BS. It is you who has zero facts in support of anything. Typical liberal.

This is your response after you have failed to support your OP in any way?

Don't feed the troll, people.

 

[Robert Prey]

Teachers Riot

When you damage property as the "educators" did in Madison, that qualifies as a riot. And the early estimate was 7.5 million.

http://www.wkow.com/Global/story.asp?S=14183941

 

[A'isha]

http://www.wkow.com/Global/story.asp?S=14183941

"Early estimates", huh?

According to later estimates, not so much.

Stephans admitted in the memo that the estimates were an "estimated guess." An open records request by the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel revealed the estimate was based on a few of Stephans' handwritten estimates on a single piece of notebook paper.

A memo from Department of State Facilities Deputy Division Administrator Peter Maternowski later revised those costs, saying the combination of repairs to the marble, lawn and shrubberies could cost as little as $350,000. The interior work alone could cost as little as $100,000, according to the memo's estimate.

In fact, the demonstrators treated the capital with "the utmost care and respect"...or so the executive director for the Madison Trust for Historic Preservation said.

 

[varwoche]

When you damage property as the "educators" did in Madison, that qualifies as a riot. And the early estimate was 7.5 million.

http://www.wkow.com/Global/story.asp?S=14183941

Get this ... from your link:

The Department of Administration says the number is so high because there are 43 different kinds of marble in the Capitol and tape used to put up signs could stain the marble.

What a riot indeed. << the ever-so-rarely used double

 

[A Laughing Baby]

You're not even trying. Come back when you have a cogent argument or evidence to support your claims. Otherwise, stop wasting everyone's time.

 

[Robert Prey]

"Early estimates", huh?

According to later estimates, not so much.



In fact, the demonstrators treated the capital with "the utmost care and respect"...or so the executive director for the Madison Trust for Historic Preservation said.

The 7.5 million was an estimate, the lower figure of $350,000 is also an estimate. Both are really guestimates since the final figure is yet to be published. Fact is, damage by the "educators" was done. And they refused to leave when asked (trespassing). Moreover the taxpayers lost several millions due to teachers calling in "sick" (lying, fraud). That's the Left for you. Takers, not Makers. It's an old story and one could go all the way back to the origins of Lefty violence in birth of the Democrat party backed Ku Klux Klan.

 

[varwoche]

I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore! It's time to stick it to the man!

 

[A'isha]

The 7.5 million was an estimate, the lower figure of $350,000 is also an estimate. Both are really guestimates since the final figure is yet to be published. Fact is, damage by the "educators" was done. And they refused to leave when asked (trespassing). Moreover the taxpayers lost several millions due to teachers calling in "sick" (lying, fraud). That's the Left for you. Takers, not Makers. It's an old story and one could go all the way back to the origins of Lefty violence in birth of the Democrat party backed Ku Klux Klan.

Okay, I'm calling Poe. Especially with that last sentence.

 

[Dancing David]

Zzzzzz. That's all you got. Just more BS. It is you who has zero facts in support of anything. Typical liberal.

So you have no evidence? You misuse the term 'nominate'? You can't support your ideas?

This is the JREF, it is no more liberal than anything.

I believe you sir or madam are hanging onto your political woo with both hands and resorting to a weak defense.

 

[Dancing David]

It's the Makers versus the Takers. When the Takers are upset, or don't get what they want, they typically riot. If the Anointed One loses the next election, unless it is to another Black man, the police will be out in force the next day in anticipation of the obvious, the same as they would be if Detroit lost in the NBA finals.

Capiltal Letters shall avail you not, the facts are as they stand.

facts presented by you:

zero

 

[Gazpacho]

Riot: A gathering of three or more people to tape signs to marble walls

 

[bikerdruid]

right wing whacktards have never needed facts to prove their points.
they claim the moral high ground, cuz all left thinking people are commie, christian hating, faggot loving, gun fearing, evil folks.

 

[Travis]

He's also conflating race riots with Leftist riots.

 

[Alferd_Packer]

He's also conflating race riots with Leftist riots.

To him, there is no difference.