Merged Andrew Napolitano: Fox News Contributor, Truther

[The Charnel Expanse]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/24/andrew-napolitano-fox-bus_n_788219.html

Truthers, by and large, fall into at least one of three categories - the paranoid, the hucksters and the intellectually lazy/gullible. Knowing what I know about Napolitano, I think it's safe to assume he falls into the two latter groups.
I mostly find it amusing that he's willing to charge the Bush Admin. with mass murder and treason, but has no problem cashing checks from its unofficial propaganda ministry.
Cute, Andy, real cute.

 

[leftysergeant]

Are you ruling out batcrapcrazy?

 

[The Charnel Expanse]

Are you ruling out batcrapcrazy?

see: paranoid

 

[brazenlilraisin]

I'm pleased! The judge from Power Of Attorney has provided the best reason yet not to take anything he says seriously.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

The only excuse after nearly ten years for having "questions" but not answers is deliberate avoidance of the answers. Napolitano doesn't understand the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC7 because he chooses not to. It's time for FOX to throw this treasonous twit off their bench.

 

[RedIbis]

The only excuse after nearly ten years for having "questions" but not answers is deliberate avoidance of the answers. Napolitano doesn't understand the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC7 because he chooses not to. It's time for FOX to throw this treasonous twit off their bench.

...orrr, he just doesn't find the so called evidence to be convincing.

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

Fox's Andrew Napolitano comes out as a Truther- and Huffington Post Truthers go crazy

I noticed the headline on Huffington Post that Fox News's Andrew Napolitano has come out as a 9/11 Truther. That doesn't shock me, but what was annoying is that the far left Truthers that responded to the article-they came out of the woodwork,and nearly all the followup posts on that article were batsh*t crazy Truthers. None had any proof over an inside job, only links to Youtube videos.

I'm very much a liberal and proud of it, but tend to avoid Huffington post and Democratic Underground as they are infested with Truthers. I wonder how long Napolitano will stay at Fox? I can't stand the right wing slant of FOX, but at least they tend to put Truthers in their place.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/24/andrew-napolitano-fox-bus_n_788219.html

 

[dtugg]

...orrr, he just doesn't find the so called evidence to be convincing.

Only because he doesn't want to because he prefers to believe that George Bush or whomever blew up the WTC for whatever reason. Sort of like you.

 

[brazenlilraisin]

Keith Olbermann just made a great case that Fox News [sic] is obligated to fire Napolitano or be branded hypocritical for the way its hosts went after Van Jones.

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

the followup comments on that Huffington Post article that were left by Truthers are so typical- Their idea of 'proof' of a conspiracy are links to Youtube videos.

I'm liberal, but tend to avoid Huffington Post as it's infested with far left 'Bush did it' Truthers...

 

[The Big Dog]

...orrr, he just doesn't find the so called evidence to be convincing.

Not unlike the evidence that Silverstein "made out like a bandit" or "is putting all the insurance money in his pocket"?

I don't know why you even post here anymore.

 

[Puppycow]

Keith Olbermann just made a great case that Fox News [sic] is obligated to fire Napolitano or be branded hypocritical for the way its hosts went after Van Jones.

That's a good point.

Here's something else that's interesting:

Republican Chairman of the Transportation Committee is a big fan of Alex Jones

Today John J. Duncan, who's in line to become the chair of the Highways and Transit subcommittee, appeared on the Alex Jones 9-11 conspiracy show. He admits to being a long time frequent listener of Alex's 9-11 conspiracy theories and praises his fight against the imaginary New World Order.

ETA: Here's fox news contributor Charles Krauthammer lambasting Van Jones for signing a Truther petition.

Will he also go after Napolitano and Duncan? I'm not holding my breath.

 

[rsalinger]

There is nothing in what he says that could be called evidence of a conspiracy. He's done no research, that's very very clear.

 

[UWdude]

good thing the truth movement died in 2006.

 

[Dave Rogers]

...orrr, he just doesn't find the so called evidence to be convincing.

...and believes, for some reason, that his inability to understand the evidence should be someone else's problem.

Dave

 

[Thunder]

the man has no forehead.

 

[Quad4_72]

There is nothing in what he says that could be called evidence of a conspiracy. He's done no research, that's very very clear.

Ummmm I'm pretty sure he watched a youtube video made by a film school drop out. If that's not research then I don't know what is dammit.

 

[RedIbis]

Not unlike the evidence that Silverstein "made out like a bandit" or "is putting all the insurance money in his pocket"?

I don't know why you even post here anymore.

One of the reasons is to watch you make up quotes I never said.

 

[Dave Rogers]

One of the reasons is to watch you make up quotes I never said.

Quotes, plural? I could have sworn the "made out like a bandit" one was accurate, at least.

Dave

 

[Unsecured Coins]

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5992321#post5992321

No, wrong. He made out like a bandit when he received much more compensation than he invested and refuses to contribute his own money to the rebuilding, seeking instead public and private funds.

This has been laid out for you ad nauseum. If you want to continue this discussion bump one of the many threads on the topic and stop derailing this one.