• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Anders Björkman interview

As I understand it, based upon what he's said in the past, he was/is involved with converting old oil tankers into glorified over sized holding barges used for offshore drilling.
 
re: reply to Pavlovian Dogcatcher

I don't need to provide experimental confirmation to support Bazant. I don't even know if Bazant is 100% correct in analyzing how the towers fell. But it was obvious, planes hit buildings, fires break out, buildings collapse. HELLO!

If you think that the World Trade Center Towers were destroyed with anything other than planes crashing into these towers and the resultant fires, you need to provide some sort of real proof. Show the world the photographs of the planted bombs, or of the detonators, or even a single inch of detonation cord that anyone has ever found. Give us the names of the people who were involved and the connections between these people and the US government and any plot you think they were involved in to destroy these buildings. If you do not have at least this, then you have absolutely nothing. After almost 9 years it appears that you have absolutely nothing, just one great big fat nothing. As you said yourself, you have just plain crack pottery.
 
Aw ya see, he had good intentions, he didn't want to scare the kids!

That heavy breathing got on my nerves something awful. It was like he was doing the interview whilst on a treadmill.

ETA-
I just got to the part where he starts throwing around accusations about Banzant; pretty vicious lol. I take it this is after he got his ass handed to him when he submitted his paper?
 
Last edited:


I see that scaling, among other issues, AB is still clueless on! Bravo!

Björkman explains why he believes the Piledriver idea is ridiculous.“If you have a structure—anything, building blocks, Lego, or a book case, and you take the top part and drop it on the rest—because it’s the same structure—the smaller top part can never supply sufficient energy to destroy the bigger bottom—as long as it’s the same structure.

PATHETIC!
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom