Always remember September for stundie noms

Well hell why even bother educating kids if that is the case?

"Sorry Skippy but books and stuff costs money and we need it for the radiation filters on the bunker."
 
Originally Posted by ergo View Post
Both Mark Lindeman and Sunstealer seem to think Newton's Third Law helps their argument. I'd be very interested in learning how.

You have the floor, boys.
Your point?

Quote:
When two bodies interact by exerting force on each other, these forces (termed the action and the reaction) are equal in magnitude, but opposite in direction.
Click to expand...

Apparently the WTC couldn't have collapsed as the gravitational pull from the bottom floors (pulling the top downwards) would have been countered by the gravitational pull from the top floors (pulling the bottom upwards)

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8603978&postcount=39
 
Travis said:
Holy ****!

I should be like a super powerful Warlock at this point.
Click to expand...

Nope, sorry. A says to tell you Rosie Palm and her five sisters count, and if you don't stop it you'll go blind to boot.
 
Travis said:
Well hell why even bother educating kids if that is the case?

"Sorry Skippy but books and stuff costs money and we need it for the radiation filters on the bunker."
Click to expand...

I hear there are some draught blockers over in GS&P that are a bargain...
 
I assume we can nominate posts that have been moved to AAH. (a members only forum)
If not mods please remove this post, thank you.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=243609

Apparently there is a new definition of 'handwaving' that I was unaware of.

]Originally Posted by FatFreddy88
Anyone who doesn't know about the Apollo-related issue of space radiation can see a partial summary of it in post #1 of the moon-hoax thread in the "Club" section of the "SpursTalk" forum. I'd post some of it here, but it would be off-topic. These pro-Apollo posters here are well aware of the issue.
Click to expand...
Originally posted by jaydeehess
I have seen all the evidence from both sides of this issue and have concluded , beyond a shadow of any doubt, that all space missions, most definately including tha Apollo missions, occured exactly as described in the commonly accepted historical narritive.
More specifically I have seen you post extreme nonsense and demand that it be accepteed by persons with demonstrably more scientific knowledge and sense, including even myself, than you.
Click to expand...

I see a lot of handwaving but no posts with any real substance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handwaving

This post is a classic example of "Handwaving".
(post #13)

Quote:
I have seen all the evidence from both sides of this issue and have concluded , beyond a shadow of any doubt, that all space missions, most definately including tha Apollo missions, occured exactly as described in the commonly accepted historical narritive.
More specifically I have seen you post extreme nonsense and demand that it be accepteed by persons with demonstrably more scientific knowledge and sense, including even myself, than you.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Is it 'handwaving' now, to specify that one has reviewed evidence from both sides of an arguement and come to the conclusion that one side is without merit unless one specifically reiterates the entrire winning arguement?
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
In an attempt to refute the idea that human bodies can act as any kind of fuel, Simon666 (mercifully) links to a picture of children not burning.




"Psh! Wood can't act as a fuel! Just look at this living tree. See? Not burning!"
Click to expand...

Darn! Two years ago I could have posted a picture of a tree surrounded by burnt grass and shrubs and suffering from some scorching and burnt lower branches and bark which otoh, to this day, is still alive and not a pile of ash.
Today that tree has two dead branches but is certainly not a pile of ash.

However, one can easily find pictures and video of forest fires and the aftermath in which trees that were fully involved in actually combusting remain quite dead.
Poor Simon.
 
Though this isn't conspiracy related, it is incredibly stupid. I just felt the need to share it.

Once again, it's men who rape, men who commit violent crimes and men who incarcerate them. there are no credible studies that prove otherwise.

Your insistance on this unsupported, unfounded line of reasoning makes one thing clear:

Your aim is not to help men. Your sole aim is to villify women.
Click to expand...
http://io9.com/5941659/?post=52539373

Yes, that's right. Women never rape, commit violent crimes, or incarcerate men in prisons, where they are raped only by other men. I wonder what she would say if someone pointed out that rapes occur in women's prisons as well, and a lot of the perps are women? Heck, even male prisoners are raped by female guards.

I really hope she's a troll.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom