Norman Alexander
Penultimate Amazing
In fact, Hahnemann was a proponent of rigorous testing of potions and remedies, much along the lines of the double-blind style gold-standard today. His method, "proving", was to test them on a live subject (usually himself) and note the effects honestly.This is not strictly accurate. Hahnemann lived and died before modern medicine existed. In a way, at the time, homeopathy was better than the "allopathic" medicine at the time (which was pretty awful), because at least it didn't have side effects.
Unfortunately he started with a massive dose of full-strength cinchona powder (aka quinine), which had some predictably serious side-effects as a result (some people are allergic to quinine, and Hahnemann described his symptoms as being very much like that reaction).
It was this event that prompted him to consider diluting the doses of remedies in a controlled fashion, leading to the development of his "scientific" dilution method for his own safety. From the highly diluted doses he then recorded his symptoms faithfully, which he called "proving". His limitation was he had no understanding of molecular science, and thus the notion he was diluting remedies out of existence. But to be fair, neither did a lot of other scientists at the time - chemistry as we know it today was only in its infancy.
So he started well-meaning and ahead of his time, but rapidly headed off down a non-scientific path. Within a few decades, scientists had the basics of molar chemistry, and realised Hahnemann was just fooling himself. The very first debunking of homeopathy was in the early 1800's, but by that time Hahnemann was a cranky old codger hawking his notions across Europe and was having no truck with this "new science". It was at this time he coined the word "allopathy" as an insult. He failed to understand what he was denigrating then, and things have gotten worse since.
Last edited: