• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged All things Trump + Russia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do we know this to be true? Was the lawyer an official representative of the Kremlin? There seems to be doubt about this. Seems like the only thing that could get Trump out of hot water is if she were not, unless it is illegal to receive election help from a citizen of another country.

I have seen it asserted on BBCs website that she was an official government "something", but I see denials too.

Is this, or will it be, the main point of contention?
Would it not be part of standard CIA process to know who she was, and if they didn't know already to find out ASAP.
 
Now, now... I actually took the time to research the claim by checking out the file format specification. I may still be incorrect, but I did do additional research. Research which seems to indicate that the claims made about the files' timezone are still, at best, unproven.


You did research, not additional research. ;)

Your first post was just spontaneous responding to an out of context quote by someone known for not being up to speed on a number of issues. If you or the guy who "showed his expertise" earlier care to really look into the analysis and come up with substantial critique, I suggest to take it to a new thread. As you had to learn, the author is reacting.
 
Last edited:
Close enough to convince me, sure, but I'm heavily biased against Trump. I could possibly be convinced by seeing it written on a bathroom wall. I think a very direct connection would be necessary to convince most Trump supporters. One step removed isn't good enough.

Most Trump supporters won't be "convinced" no matter how direct the connection. They don't care what the truth is. However, if cornered, they will simply express admiration for Trump's resourcefulness and willingness to do what needs to be done in order to win.
 
You did research, not additional research. ;)

Your first post was just spontaneous responding to an out of context quote by someone known for not being up to speed on a number of issues. If you or the guy who "showed his expertise" earlier care to really look into the analysis and come up with substantial critique, I suggest to take it to a new thread. As you had to learn, the author is reacting.


As was pointed out, you put far too much faith in data (the timestamps) that is... unreliable at best.
 
This may well not link to Trump Sr, unless he or Junior say something really stupid (not beyond consideration, of course), but Kushner's position looks untenable. No doubt to the delight of some in the administration who find him a tad too cosmopolitan for their tastes, if you get my drift.

The whole thing might turn out to be a (((cosmopolitan))) frame-up job. Putinettes scouring Veterans Today as we speak for further details.
 
Adding events pertaining to Roger Stone / Podesta:

Mar 19| Podesta email hacked
Apr 19| DCLeaks.com registered
May 3| Trump becomes presumptive nominee
June 3| Goldstone contacts Trump Jr. to setup meeting
June 8| Trump posts link to DCLeaks
June 9| Trump Jr, Kushner, Manafort meet with Russian operative
June 12| Assange announces Clinton emails
June 27| Hacked emails posted to DCLeaks
July 11| Trump/Manafort nix pro-Ukranian plank in GOP platform (and lie about it)
Aug 21| Roger Stone writes "it will soon be Podesta's time in the barrel"
Oct 27| Wikileaks releases Podesta emails*

* An hour after pussy-grabbing video released.
 
Last edited:
As was pointed out, you put far too much faith in data (the timestamps) that is... unreliable at best.


As was pointed out, it's totally obvious that you didn't even read what you were trying to wave away with your "technically-minded" pleas. Now step aside and let the "Russia is at fault for my misery" crowd enjoy the last waves.
 
Hey varwoche, not that I'm not impressed by your use of colours and tables, but I suggest your time would be better spent by putting sources to the little items you collect, not least to make sure they aren't only true in your mind. I'm sure it would also help to convince others that you're not just engaging in free-flying conspiracy theorizing.
 
Last edited:
Hey varwoche, not that I'm not impressed by your use of colours and tables, but I suggest your time would be better spent putting sources to the little items you collect, not least to make sure they aren't only true in your mind. I'm sure it would also help to convince others that you're not just engaging in free-flying conspiracy theorizing.
If there's anything in particular you take issue with, let me know and I'll provide evidence.
 
Aside from derailing the thread, why do we care about rar files?
I'm reminded of the "ClimateGate" CRU hack. That was traced to Russians as well, and it's since become an article of faith in the AGW denial world that it wasn't a hack it was a leak. The same process can be seen here and now.
 
Adding events pertaining to Roger Stone / Podesta:

Mar 19| Podesta email hacked
Apr 19| DCLeaks.com registered
May 3| Trump becomes presumptive nominee
June 3| Goldstone contacts Trump Jr. to setup meeting
June 8| Trump posts link to DCLeaks
June 9| Trump Jr, Kushner, Manafort meet with Russian operative
June 12| Assange announces Clinton emails
June 27| Hacked emails posted to DCLeaks
July 11| Trump/Manafort nix pro-Ukranian plank in GOP platform (and lie about it)
Aug 21| Roger Stone writes "it will soon be Podesta's time in the barrel"
Oct 27| Wikileaks releases Podesta emails*

* An hour after pussy-grabbing video released.

You need to add the June 7th dates:

June 7 - 5:16 PM - Don Jr. confirms meeting w/ Russian lawyer

June 7 - 9:13 PM Trump promises press conf the next week with Clinton dirt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom