Ed All 43 videos "Second Hit"" [Explosion]at WTC 2: Plane or No Plane?

[TJM]

From the video:

<usual blather snipped>

all the best

The video grabs I provide here prove that Judy Wood is a paranoid schizophrenic, because she admits here sensory organs speak to her and in fact, fight with each other, She talks to herself and she's afraid. Andrew Johnson clearly states he's making incorrect assumptions and his assumptions don't add up because, after all, "It's jist a conspiracy theory!"

All the best.

 

[jammonius]

AJM,

Your claims for what you have proven are not only overstated, they are flat out wrong.

Why don't you go about this in the right way, as follows:

1--Post up links to the videos so we can all take a look.

2--Relate whatever it is you want to say about the videos to this thread.


By the way, I assume the videos you are linking us to have something to do with shadow thingy or with zee plane, at least, or with the ALL 43 videos, or with alleged Flight 175.

If all else fails, I do hope your posting has something to do with the whataboutthepassengers ditty, at a minimum. Surely you're not setting yourself up for one of those mod actions, are you?

 

[TJM]

AJM,

Your claims for what you have proven are not only overstated, they are flat out wrong.

Why don't you go about this in the right way. Post up links to the videos so we can all take a look.

Yes, but it's my interpretation and it's right because I say it is. I handwave away any further argument on the matter because Andrew says it for the world to hear: "It's jist a conspiracy theory!"

That is rich.

 

[BigAl]

AJM,

Your claims for what you have proven are not only overstated, they are flat out wrong.

Why don't you go about this in the right way, as follows:

1--Post up links to the videos so we can all take a look.

OK.
This is a video of the most powerful DEW weapon in existence as of 2006.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVxZ9IHTH2E

This is as of 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfmEUqmgsK4

 

[jammonius]

OK.
This is a video of the most powerful DEW weapon in existence as of 2006.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVxZ9IHTH2E

This is as of 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfmEUqmgsK4

Hi BigAl,

Thanks for the above. Would you please consider putting the above post over in the SAIC/ARA thread?

I will gladly engage with you on that over there.

best

 

[fess]

If word salad and arrogance were edible, Jammonius could single handedly wipe out world famine for the next 100 years.

By the way Jammy, when are you coming to New York?

 

[fess]

Originally Posted by jammonius I, on the other hand, have said, many, many times that there are some legitimate PLANE SPOTTER witnesses. And, I have linked and commented on the ones that appear legitimate. I have also consistently shown, however, that the number and the quality of witnesses consistent with the NO PLANE claim outnumber and are of better quality than are those who claim plane.

By legitimate PLANE SPOTTER, I take it that you mean people that actually saw an aircraft crash into the south tower. But, because they are outnumbered by people that constantly lie about the event, their testimony is null and void?

 

[EventHorizon]

It is, of course, both a violation of board rules as well as a stupid tactic to post personal attacks. Clearly, no one here can make a mental health diagnosis about anyone else based on what is posted.

Nobody here is diagnosing you as a schizophrenic; as you say, that would be impossible to do based on what is being posted. It is merely being pointed out that you do fit the description of one who is suffering from schizophrenia. That could easily be a coincidence.

 

[jammonius]

OK.
This is a video of the most powerful DEW weapon in existence as of 2006.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVxZ9IHTH2E

This is as of 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfmEUqmgsK4

Oops, my apologies BigAl. I made a mistake. I see that you did post those video links in the SAIC/ARA thread:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6278566&postcount=443

Sorry for my error; and, thanks for posting the links to those videos.

 

[jammonius]

Nobody here is diagnosing you as a schizophrenic; as you say, that would be impossible to do based on what is being posted. It is merely being pointed out that you do fit the description of one who is suffering from schizophrenia. That could easily be a coincidence.

Yours is a clever post, very clever indeed; too clever by a half.

I say that because many of the "jammonius crazy" posts contain no room for nuanced interpretation. They are merely stupid, uninformed, useless put downs that reflect upon the poster of them and that say nothing whatever about anyone else at all.

all the best

 

[sheeplesnshills]

AJM,

Your claims for what you have proven are not only overstated, they are flat out wrong.

LOL the irony!

 

[sheeplesnshills]

I say that because many of the "jammonius crazy" posts contain no room for nuanced interpretation.

Jammo they are observations based on EVERY post you make. You make wild assertions and offer nothing that could be even vaguely described as evidence, you deny the obvious and say it is something else, you will not answer even the simplest of questions and make long rambling word salad replies when a simple yes or no would suffice. You are either an evil little troll or you are insane. We are simply giving you the benefit of the doubt.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Thanks for putting your propaganda, control mechanism out into the open, Compus. You are plainly using fake and fraudulent sympathy for people who are missing and presumed dead as a means of squelching appreciation of the abundant NO PLANE facts, information and proof that has been posted in this thread.


Yet you can not show that any of it is faked and you have not posted a single piece of credible evidence for there being no plane. Everything you post just makes it even clearer that there were planes and that there is absolutely overwhelming evidence for them.
Watched the 43 videos yet again. And, yes, those are planes flying into the wTC2 tower.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

What's the obsession with posting the ages of those killed?

Its a symptom of autism. It helps them get a feeling of control and order.

 

[jammonius]

The video grabs I provide here prove that Judy Wood is a paranoid schizophrenic, because she admits here sensory organs speak to her and in fact, fight with each other, She talks to herself and she's afraid. Andrew Johnson clearly states he's making incorrect assumptions and his assumptions don't add up because, after all, "It's jist a conspiracy theory!"

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=456&pictureid=3649[/qimg]

All the best.

Speaking jist for me, I think this is a better picture of Dr. Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson:

 

[Myriad]

I think this is a better picture of Dr. Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson:

But who's that third person on the left? Why has this photograph been altered in aspect ratio and cropped so close to its ostensible subject in violation of basic rules of composition and portraiture? Was it to hide that person? Why do you not wish us to see him?

I have shown sufficient evidence of alteration and concealment of vital information to render this photograph inadmissible, except to show that you do not wish us to know the full truth, but only a limited portion that you show us in order to create a false impression. You want us to see two people, when there were three.

That photo is in fact a No-Judy-Wood photo. Thank you for posting it.

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[jiggeryqua]

Its a symptom of autism. It helps them get a feeling of control and order.

I have friends who are schizpohrenic and autistic - though nobody who is both. I can just about stomach your need to suggest that Jammonius is schizophrenic (though I don't think it helps much, or sets a good example, or shows you in a good light), but you are even less well informed about autism. It isn't a mental illness, we all exist somewhere on the autistic spectrum and there is no doubt that some of your behaviours are 'symptoms' of autism (if only 'symptom' was remotely appropriate a term in relation to autists) - your obsessive need to argue pointlessly with someone you believe has schizophrenic paranoid delusions, for example. Here's a clue: that won't work.

So please, lay off the autists - you have enough on Jammonius without needing to insult him by insulting all autists. Chances are a good few posters here are Aspergian. Are they part of the 'them' you just shunted all autists off to? The one that's so dangerously distinct from 'us'? How do you get by without seeking to impose some order and control in your life?

 

[jammonius]

But who's that third person on the left? Why has this photograph been altered in aspect ratio and cropped so close to its ostensible subject in violation of basic rules of composition and portraiture? Was it to hide that person? Why do you not wish us to see him?

I have shown sufficient evidence of alteration and concealment of vital information to render this photograph inadmissible, except to show that you do not wish us to know the full truth, but only a limited portion that you show us in order to create a false impression. You want us to see two people, when there were three.

That photo is in fact a No-Judy-Wood photo. Thank you for posting it.

Respectfully,
Myriad

Well, Myriad, let's see what we shall see here. Certainly, you display a skill at photo analysis that might still prove to be very useful in deconstructing the common storyline of 9/11. Goodness knows fake imagery is a hallmark of that storyline. I do hope you will choose to put some of your obvious skill to work in that regard at some point.

Here's hoping.

I still think the photo of Dr. Wood and of Mr. Johnson that I posted is better than that posted in # 3681 above, cropped or not. By the way, some of your assumptions about the cropping might or might not be true.

Nonetheless, your imitation of Sherlock Holmes is more worthy than, say, your descent into "belief" in the face of information that directly contradicted what you chose to believe. I am here referring to your now famous post # 374 over in the SAIC/ARA thread:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6265549&postcount=374


Respectfully,
jammonius

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Speaking jist for me, I think this is a better picture of Dr. Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson:

[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/judyandrewbetter.jpg?t=1283692970[/qimg]

Please explain why if the NWO or MIC could kill thousands on 911, these two have not had tragic accidents?
Why waste all the money on shills when a simple "heart attack" or "fall" under a bus would shut them up for good?
How do you explain the fact that YOU are still alive?

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Yet you can't show us any???? You saying it is faked does not make it so. All the footage is consistant and looks like planes hitting buildings, thanks to you we showed that the RADAR data does not contradict the videos and futher that the angle of the flightpath was less than 25 degrees so that there was no near vertical dive to start with!

The only fake around here is you. You fake sincerity, you fake comprehension and even fake empathy.