Ever hear of the use-mention distinction? You just used the word ******.
Saying: ""Hillary ain't never been called a ******" is not racist. For one thing, it's true.
"Snipery" Hillary being a famous white person, it is not only true, but so painfully obvious, the only point in the phrase is to work the word "******" into the sermon. Was Obama ever called a ****** to his face growing up? If he wasn't (and I doubt he was), this phrase was not only pointless, but intentionally divisive, the hallmark of a Wright sermon.
Are you trying to suggest that employing the word in that way proves that Wright is prejudiced against black people?
It proves that Wright operates under a double standard. Chris Rock has a routine about how some blacks are prejudiced against other blacks according to their shade of color.
Sophistry should me more ... sophisticated.
Because, as you can see by reading Obama's statement, Wright "suggested that Minister Farrakhan somehow represents one of the greatest voices of the 20th and 21st century", a proposition that Obama apparently finds ridiculous.
You seem to be doing mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that what Obama found outrageous was that Wright could characterize an antisemite as being "great."
It is. It is also possible for "a black" not to make racist comments, even if you want him to have done so very very much.
Or maybe this is a wish-fulfillment fantasy with no substantiating evidence
.
Listening to Wright's sermons, he likes whites about as much as David Duke likes blacks. Now, you may not consider his comments anything other than a litany of the perfidy of the White Devil, but to many others, there is more than a whiff of racism emanating from the priapic preacher's pulpit.
I will defend anyone against false allegations; and no-one against true ones.
