AIA Convention resolution - the 3rd try. Rebuttals, please!

[benthamitemetric]

Especially after the Plasco fire official investigation's conclusion, they should have modified this point before the presentation. Did they? Or did they just lie?

They lied. You can find the full text of the resolution in the rules packet here. The third whereas clause reads:

WHEREAS, prior to and since September 11, 2001, no steel-framed highrise has ever suffered a total collapse, except buildings demolished through the procedure known as controlled demolition;

(pg 34 of the doc/pg 36 of the pdf)

 

[Oystein]

The failure of the AIA leadership to inform their members and the public of this utter and unequivocal failure is quite enigmatic. They are not silent on their various social media outlets:

• On Facebook, they had 2 posts within the last 24 hours (here and here), none with an AIA theme, while their last announcement of the AIA Convention activity (2.5 days ago) spawned several comments from fans asking for the result, and not getting an answer
• On Twitter, they tweeted yesterday: "15 most commonly asked questions of AE911Truth about the destruction of the World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11. http://www.ae911truth.org/news/faqs.html ", while probably the top most FAQ currently is "what's the result?"
• On Youtube, they uploaded a French version about this NIST outsider Peter Ketcham yesterday, when I remember that in past years they would upload mobile phone videos from the Convention while it was on.

Nothing, of course, on their homepage, no newsletter either.

 

[Trojan]

Are there 182 members who are paranoid, or did they fail to study

Or dozed off and thought they were voting for another resolution

 

[gerdbonk]

That's it, then, right? Three strikes and all that?

 

[pgimeno]

Quite possibly. Gage surely knows better than to invest money in a lost cause that doesn't produce dividends.

 

[rwguinn]

... Gage surely knows better than to invest money in a lost cause that doesn't produce dividends.

Presents as fact that which has no evidence in support...

 

[DGM]

I just noticed something. AE did not have a booth at this event.

http://fp.exhibitor.conferenceonarc...52.736850119.1493484971-1419112070.1493314865

Short on dollars?

 

[MileHighMadness]

Napoleon - Waterloo 1815
Gage - AIA 2017

 

[Oystein]

I just noticed something. AE did not have a booth at this event.

http://fp.exhibitor.conferenceonarc...52.736850119.1493484971-1419112070.1493314865

Short on dollars?

In previous years, the Business Meeting (where the voting takes place) was on the last day of the Convention. This year, it was held before the Convention opened its exhibitions. I guess that the booth's purpose was to sway unprepared, ignorant delegates - with the voting already done, a booth makes little sense then.

 

[Pinch]

That's it, then, right? Three strikes and all that?

You'd like to think so. I mean, the AE 911 dolts, in their own write up, state that "...the AIA is a respected voice on matters concerning the built environment and on larger issues such as social equity and human rights."

Now that this "respected voice" has unequivocally and without question rejected this tripe for a third year running, in numbers matching the first initial rejection (meaning AE 911 has gone *backwards* from last year), they should drop this. Fat chance, though. As long as there is a golden goose to pimp and the most gullible of this world's people to keep shoveling cash and coin to Gage, it'll continue.

 

[gerdbonk]

I know these were member-sponsored, but will the AIA continue to allow similar resolutions?

 

[DaveThomasNMSR]

It would be wrong to rub salt in an open wound...

but hey, I'm in a snarky mood today!

 

[DGM]

Still no official statement from AE...........

 

[Oystein]

Incredible - 7 hours ago, there was a new post on AE911Truth's Facebook page - and STILL no hint of the devestating defeat they took at the AIA Convention! One lone commenter (out of 18) dared to ask for the result.

And what a long post it is. Lot's to parse and expose to deserved ridicule. Just two things that fit here:

The evidence that's been collected, and presented to audiences all around the world over the past 11 years, clearly shows that explosives were used to completely destroy all of these buildings.

Then why did you not say this clearly in your resolution proposal? Perhaps you would have scored 0% then?

These are some AE911Truth key staff and board members responsible for our current level of success:
Richard Gage
...[and six more named]

This is rich, coming on the heels of the crushing failure in Orlando.
Richard, Dan, Kelly, Tom, Ted, Roland, Andy: You are responsible for your current level of FAILURE!

 

[benthamitemetric]

Tony spent part of his weekend trying to spin the news to the 10-15 people who still post on the 911Truth subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/911truth/comments/687osv/richard_gagesponsored_wtc_7_resolution_voted_down/

AE911Truth's Message: Pay no attention to the 96% of AIA folks who won't even vote for a new technical study, folks; just trust us when we say that the AIA membership actually knows WTC7 was a controlled demolition! Keep giving us money so Richard Gage can keep making all this "progress" towards the "truth." And, speaking of the truth, don't ask us about the Plasco building investigation outcome, or for any information about the two fulsome investigation reports done by WAI or the Aegis experts. We're just as interested in providing you with that information as we are in letting you know about our failure at the AIA convention. Oh, and prepare yourself to forget everything we told you the Hulsey report was going to be (a fulsome examination to determine the cause of the WTC7 collapse). It's just going to be a technical critique of a few aspects of the NIST reports, which is exactly what we promised it wouldn't be. And it won't be peer reviewed (except by a "panel" we select so that we can fool people who don't understand what peer review is) and published; we're just going to use it to raise money--money that we will use so Richard Gage can keep making all this "progress" towards the "truth."

 

[benthamitemetric]

Incredible - 7 hours ago, there was a new post on AE911Truth's Facebook page - and STILL no hint of the devestating defeat they took at the AIA Convention! ....
Richard, Dan, Kelly, Tom, Ted, Roland, Andy: You are responsible for your current level of FAILURE!

LOL, and the graphic they use for the post not only uses a fake Buddha quote, but also even managed to spell Buddha incorrectly. If these guys weren't in the business of fleecing ignorant people, I would actually feel bad for them seeing these levels of ineptitude. Can't even get the little things right.

 

[Brainster]

Tony spent part of his weekend trying to spin the news to the 10-15 people who still post on the 911Truth subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/911truth/comments/687osv/richard_gagesponsored_wtc_7_resolution_voted_down/

AE911Truth's Message: Pay no attention to the 96% of AIA folks who won't even vote for a new technical study, folks; just trust us when we say that the AIA membership actually knows WTC7 was a controlled demolition! Keep giving us money so Richard Gage can keep making all this "progress" towards the "truth." And, speaking of the truth, don't ask us about the Plasco building investigation outcome, or for any information about the two fulsome investigation reports done by WAI or the Aegis experts. We're just as interested in providing you with that information as we are in letting you know about our failure at the AIA convention. Oh, and prepare yourself to forget everything we told you the Hulsey report was going to be (a fulsome examination to determine the cause of the WTC7 collapse). It's just going to be a technical critique of a few aspects of the NIST reports, which is exactly what we promised it wouldn't be. And it won't be peer reviewed (except by a "panel" we select so that we can fool people who don't understand what peer review is) and published; we're just going to use it to raise money--money that we will use so Richard Gage can keep making all this "progress" towards the "truth."

Yet another pie-in-the-face ending for the Troofers. My personal favorite was Truth Burn (a decade ago). An artist designed a big metal sign with the word "Truth" on it. He planned to use thermite to burn the two legs of the sign so it would collapse. Oh, and it was going to take place at Burning Man. Sounded great, so the Troofers threw thousands of dollars at him (the number I recall was $20,000, but I can't verify that right now).

What did they do? Well, it was windy that evening and so they burned about 80 lbs of thermite in a pot under the sign, and Richard Gage gave a little speech.

As one of the Troofers said in a great comment on 9-11 Flogger:

What the hell was that?..........I would have rather seen a sugar cube sky scraper filled with firecrackers.

 

[benthamitemetric]

Yet another pie-in-the-face ending for the Troofers. My personal favorite was Truth Burn (a decade ago). An artist designed a big metal sign with the word "Truth" on it. He planned to use thermite to burn the two legs of the sign so it would collapse. Oh, and it was going to take place at Burning Man. Sounded great, so the Troofers threw thousands of dollars at him (the number I recall was $20,000, but I can't verify that right now).

What did they do? Well, it was windy that evening and so they burned about 80 lbs of thermite in a pot under the sign, and Richard Gage gave a little speech.

As one of the Troofers said in a great comment on 9-11 Flogger:

Oh man, I had never seen or even heard about that. Great public demonstration of (1) there was nothing that looked anything like gigantic thermite charges going off at ground zero, and (2) even allowing for a spectacular visual display the likes of which was completely absent on 9-11, they couldn't figure out how to make it actually cut slender steel columns in a predictable way. At least they are consistent in their inanity. Too bad they still manage to separate people from their money with this abject nonsense.

 

[cantonear1968]

I just noticed something. AE did not have a booth at this event.

http://fp.exhibitor.conferenceonarc...52.736850119.1493484971-1419112070.1493314865

Short on dollars?

In previous years, the Business Meeting (where the voting takes place) was on the last day of the Convention. This year, it was held before the Convention opened its exhibitions. I guess that the booth's purpose was to sway unprepared, ignorant delegates - with the voting already done, a booth makes little sense then.

They're saying they were denied booth space.

From facebook:

Among the topics discussed are:....(2) this year's denial to AE911Truth of exhibit booth space on the convention floor

https://www.facebook.com/ae911truth/photos/rpp.59185411268/10154333902306269/?type=3&theater

 

[beachnut]

They're saying they were denied booth space.

From facebook:


https://www.facebook.com/ae911truth/photos/rpp.59185411268/10154333902306269/?type=3&theater

Fringe nuts come out and post on AE911t, exposing the type of paranoia and ignorance required to believe Richard Gage's failed claims.

Maybe Gage is a agent for the government who finds nuts...

https://www.facebook.com/ae911truth/photos/rpp.59185411268/10154333902306269/?type=3&theater
From the comments section

Johann Wapstra THE TRUTH IS ALREADY EXPOSED BUT THE MEDIA IS OWNED BY THE JEWS BUT THE DAY WILL COME WHEN THEY WILL HANG

Toby Tyler I wish TRUMP could get access to the real reports on 911,,,,Flight 93 was fake,,,all the pictures show no plane parts, bodies, luggage,,, just a missle hole in the ground,,,, the farmers said no plane parts way before the athorities ever showed up.

Who is faking an identity to make up silly stuff? Which one of you did this? No one can be this stupid. oops

Frankie Panaia Slightly revised: this is how 'they' pulled if off. The so-called 19 Muslim hijackers were in truth, 19 Contractors. The conspirators simply arranged forged / cloned passports for the real non-Muslim culprits, who seized control of the flights, to re-route the same flights to a clandestine airstrip. It was simplicity in itself: the identity of the actual hijackers were hidden under the bogeyman cover of 19 Islamic Middle-Eastern (Arabs). The 19 Muslims got the blame, while the real hijackers went completely unnoticed.

Steve Lane Simple fact number 1. Buildings do not just free fall. If they do in your World your either a shill or liar (Coward). Amazing that you have to do this over and over for AIA!!

ae911t, a cult based on lies, and the ignorance of the followers