• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

AE911Truth Watch

post_new.gif
Today, 07:34 PM #899 Brainster
Philosopher



Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,969


Check out the post count!

[/ juvenile post ]
 
It is easier for a rational person to play a twoofer than for a twoofer to pass for rational.
 
Thanks for posting the recent debate. Coincidentally, I happened to hear the first debate between Ron and Richard just a few days ago and it should be interesting to see how this one goes. I am listening now.

IMO Richard won the first debate.
 
3bodyproblem said:
Welcome to the forums.

This is tongue in cheek right?
Click to expand...

No, seriously. Not saying I agree with everything Gage says but it appeared to me that Ron was arguing from incredulity throughout the first debate. I think he may have been a little underprepared for the debate but that is fair enough seeing as Gage does this full-time.

In the second debate, did I just hear Richard Gage say that Ron Craig is fully behind a new investigation???

Edited to add:

I have just replayed it and it seems Ron Craig supports a new investigation into wtc7.
 
Last edited:
Telltale Tom said:
As our great leader Mr Gage says we have millions of supporters and I am really excited that we are just about to pass an important landmark, with 1,000 Architects and Engineers signing the petition, which proves Controlled Demolition.

Unfortunately there are only 9 registered architects from NY who have signed the petition. These are:
David Helpern
Eric Douglas
Michael Coffey
Alan Haymand
William Brinnir
Michael Quiana
Cary Spiegel
Daniel Hirtler
Jeffrey Orling

I really hope that the verification of Peter Scaglione comes through, because it would be good if we could have 10 real architects from New York when we break through the 1,000 barrier.

I don't know whats wrong with these New york architects. You would think they would have cared about the towers and bothered to have looked at the evidence. I am sure there are many more who believe in CD who havent found the petition.
Click to expand...

Telltale Tom said:
I doubt you could get people to sign a petition. We also have 5 licensed structural and civil engineers from New York.

Joseph Testa
Donald Butterfield
Richard Sheridan
Roberk Randal
Ephriam Resnick

I know that Joseph Testa says that he mainly design roads but I am sure that the others must have some good experience. I admit the numbers are a bit lower than I expect. But engineers are boring and they might not of seen the massive videos we have on youtube.

Our videos are so much better than anything else. If you go to youtube we must have at least 20 videos for every one that tries to debunk us.
Click to expand...

Absent of any legitimate peer reviewed and published papers. you know what this list represents? Right?

http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#authority
 
Whats the big deal about peer reviewed papers. We have our peer reviewed videos and a lot more evidence in that department than the debunkers.

And now that we have hit 1,000 I expect we will hit 2,000 in a couple of years. Look at the petition we have a nice selection of engineers from Europe and Austalia but we have hardly touched the middle eastern or south east asian markets.

And people don't realize how easy it is to get on our lists. Look at the petition. What about Bernard Villiem from France with a degree in pre-history and anthropology or Christian Hostettler an Electrical Auttomation consultant from Australia. When people find out how easy it is to sign up our numbers will climb rapidly and we will reach 2,000 in no time.
 
TT.

It is rather amusing noting how easy it is to get on that list... I mean if george jetson, fred flintstone and barney rubble can get on it (they all have at one point in time), then it must not be too hard.
 
TruthersLie said:
It is rather amusing noting how easy it is to get on that list... I mean if george jetson, fred flintstone and barney rubble can get on it (they all have at one point in time), then it must not be too hard.
Click to expand...

I don't know what you mean, those are all well respected engineers. :D

Do you have a source for that? That would be excellent material for further discussions.

Telltale Tom said:
Whats the big deal about peer reviewed papers. We have our peer reviewed videos
Click to expand...

This is one of the dumbest statements I have ever seen. I'm sure youtube puts all the videos into peer review process before "publishing" them on their site. :rolleyes:
 
Telltale Tom said:
And now that we have hit 1,000 I expect we will hit 2,000 in a couple of years.
Click to expand...

yeah, so what? why can't you get a new investigation with 1,000 members?

2,000 is the magic number? 1,000 ain't enough?

how can you not see the comedy and stupidity in these endeavors?

pathetic.
 
Kevin.Silbstedt said:
I don't know what you mean, those are all well respected engineers. :D

Do you have a source for that? That would be excellent material for further discussions.
Click to expand...

Hi Kevin.

I have seen screen captures of the AEtruth, scholars for truth petition pages with those names on them. I do not have a copy of it bookmarked. I'll look and see if I can find it.
 
Telltale Tom said:
I doubt you could get people to sign a petition. We also have 5 licensed structural and civil engineers from New York.

Joseph Testa
Donald Butterfield
Richard Sheridan
Roberk Randal
Ephriam Resnick

I know that Joseph Testa says that he mainly design roads but I am sure that the others must have some good experience. I admit the numbers are a bit lower than I expect. But engineers are boring and they might not of seen the massive videos we have on youtube.

Our videos are so much better than anything else. If you go to youtube we must have at least 20 videos for every one that tries to debunk us.
Click to expand...


Ephraim Resnick is about 89 years old, bet he hates Bush. Most likely a pure political stand, he offers zero calculations and zero evidence except he knows the delusional conspiracy theories sound better than the complex kill pilots, take planes, crash into big buildings.

Roberk Randal did some structural design of nuclear submarines, power plants, commercial & residential buildings; he has questions, no evidence just questions; a real winner... can't figure out 911 so he signs up with a fraud who spews thermite

Where is the evidence to save Gage? These guys can't help, they only have questions; professional askers of questions. lol, 1000 of them. Wow, 1000 professional 3 year olds!!!
 
Last edited:
Telltale Tom said:
As our great leader Mr Gage says ...
we have millions of supporters ...
we are just about to pass an important landmark, with 1,000 Architects and Engineers signing the petition ...
which proves Controlled Demolition.

Unfortunately there are only 9 registered architects from NY ...

it would be good if we could have 10 real architects from New York ...

I don't know whats wrong with these New york architects...
You would think they would have cared about the towers ...
I am sure there are many more who believe in CD who havent found the petition.
Click to expand...

Telltale Tom said:
I doubt you could get people to sign a petition...
We also have 5 licensed structural and civil engineers from New York...

I know that Joseph Testa says that he mainly design roads but ...
I am sure that the others must have some good experience...
I admit the numbers are a bit lower than I expect...

[my fave. -tk]
But engineers are boring ...

they might not of seen the massive videos we have on youtube.

Our videos are so much better than anything else...
If you go to youtube we must have at least 20 videos for every one that tries to debunk us.
Click to expand...

I call shenanigans.

More specifically, Poe's Law.


Tom
 
DGM said:
Technical all his friends (peers) watched them so they're "peer reviewed".:rolleyes:

:duck:
Click to expand...


Perhaps "peer reviewed" = "seen by at least one British aristocrat"??

Tom

PS. Who do they think that they're kidding, anyway. They don't think of each other as "peers". Otherwise they would segregate into Barons, Earls, Viscounts, etc.

About as honest a term as "reality TV".
 
LashL said:
Listening to the debate again, Gage consistently comes across as nothing but an inane, uneducated, incoherent rabbit on speed. A ranting, railing idiot. I can't even imagine how anyone can possibly put any stock in anything he says. I find it difficult to fathom how even "truther" loons believe this moron.

And yes, "the constituency of talcum powder" comment was humorous. Gage's "very special explosives, including nanothermite" is funnier, though, and Gage's expectation of finding stacks of 110 floors of metal and concrete piled up at the bottom of the collapsed buildings is utterly and insanely ridiculous. The man is a raving lunatic.

Ron kicked Gage's butt by resort to reality, as expected. Yet, Gage doesn't even seem to realize it. He's nuts.
Click to expand...
Still Counselor he does constituently vonvince well over 90% of every audience that he speaks to,technical or otherwise that the buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.

Not only floors. I believe he was wondering where the 110 ACRES of floorpans were gone. Also the double layer of steel floor reinforcing- some 220 ACRES in all. H didn't even mention where most of the 10 MILES of core columns were gone.Even if most of the concrete was converted to micron-sized particles the steel should all remain. It's not in the rubble. It's-just-not-there.

So all in all it is entirely evident that you are completely and utterly wrong. Richard Gage is massively effective and proves it time after time after time..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom