• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

AE911Truth Watch

It seems (to no-one's surprise) that Gage no longer works as an architect. This is what he says, when discussing the need of further donations:



So, he does receive a salary, the salary is paid out of the donations, and he no longer works as an architect. That's how I would interpret that sentence.

What's the tax status for AE911?
 
I feel some pity for Gage. His wife left him, he no longer has a (proper) job, all because of utter nonsense.
 
The FACT that it IMPLODED is evidence that it was a CD.

CD is the ONLY known cause of high rise building implosion.

It is a fine art, extremely difficult to accomplish.

To say that the implosion of WTC 7 isn't evidence, is pure denial.

The fires in WTC 7 did not burn long enough to heat a column weigh over 7 tons per floor to over 1000[FONT=&quot]° [/FONT]F.

The FACT that the collapse of wtc7 KINDA SORTA almost LOOKED LIKE a controlled demolition is PROOF! PROOF! I tell you that it WAS a controlled demolition, and, because I say so PROOF! that Bush did it.
 
quit or get fired from your job. Claim poverty. Cut alimony

It seems (to no-one's surprise) that Gage no longer works as an architect. This is what he says, when discussing the need of further donations:



So, he does receive a salary, the salary is paid out of the donations, and he no longer works as an architect. That's how I would interpret that sentence.


I suppose that's one way to avoid alimony
 
Gage is now promoting this strange slide:

136394a2cb0c7e3e80.png


http://www.ae911truth.org/info/62

Isn't this slide suggesting that the "free fall" started at T=0, in other words suggesting that the collapse started with this 2.25 second period of free fall?

Well, NIST says that the 2.25 second period was between T=1.75 and T=4.00

Even David Chandler does not suggest that the free fall started at T=0.

So why would Gage suggest, that it started at T=0? ;)
 
Last edited:
Why would he produce a graphic like that, and pretend that it represented what the NIST thinks happened at all, unless he's a complete fraud?
 
What provided the energy for eliminating section A?

The earlier parts of the progressive collapse.

Floors-7-14-Buckling.jpg


Of course AE911Truth gets the location of the eight floors wrong. It's not 1-8, but 7-14.

After column 79 caused 80 and 81 to fail, the eastern third of the building's interior failed vertically up to the east mechanical penthouse, causing it to collapse and fall into the building. That left the rest of the interior core without any bracing to the east. That began a horizontal failure of core columns in floors 7-14.

Once they had failed, that left the entire bulk of the remaining building above the 14th floor being suspended by only the perimeter columns. And these columns were simultaneously being pulled into the building by the floor trusses still connected to the interior columns. The perimeter buckled as you can see in the graphic above, almost instantaneously.

And that was the end of floors 7-14. The above graphic represents the start of the 2.25 second timeframe. And all of this explanation is my layman's understanding, of course.
 
I don't mean the following in the sense of schadenfreude. Rather, I state it as relief for the safety of general public. But, if he's truly not working as an architect anymore, then thank goodness! His analysis of the WTC collapse dynamics suggests that he misunderstands what causes buildings to fail, and if that's the case, could he truly design a structure that is safe to begin with?

Granted, from what I understand, building engineers would sound off if a structure was designed in an unsound manner - other folks here working in the field can clarify or correct me on that point - but still, his statements do not engender trust in his abilities. If he's not designing anymore, I think it's better for the public.

In his full 2 hour presentation Gage claims: " Like many other architects though, I've designed numerous fireproofed steel framed buildings in my career including these 3 and 10 million dollar gymnasiums." (Here he shows pictures of steel framed buildings with complex moment connections).

"I'm now working on a 400 million dollar project in Nevada ... with over 1200 tons of steel framing altogether."

Gage is no structural engineer, that designed these steel buildings and stamped the drawings. I remember reading his CV online last year, now gone. (Bolo do you remember his CV?).

"I've designed" - no he didn't, at most the column spacing and building and floor heights, the rest of the design done by structural engineers of which he is not one.

" I'm now working on" could mean anything except the mechanical, electrical, structural engineering. He's an employee of a large architectural firm, not a partner and from his CV heavy on Construction Administration - the paperwork required during construction after all the designing has been done.

This has always chafed me, that he uses words like "I've designed" and "I'm now working on" along with pictures of steel structures to deceive the unknowing lay audience into believing he structurally designed and stamped the drawings of the steel framing they see in his pictures.
 
Gage is no structural engineer, that designed these steel buildings and stamped the drawings. I remember reading his CV online last year, now gone. (Bolo do you remember his CV?).

Do you have still old link to it? I think there are still ways to get to it.(Others please,do not disclose method at this time as it is possible to get it removed. And yes i think no truther knows about it unles made aware...)
 
And Richard is no longer working as an architect. I don't know if I've already posted that here, but a recent change to the fundraising page at AE911Truth makes it clear that Gage's sole line of income is his work for AE911Truth.

Here’s what you do: First, become a Sustaining Member of AE911Truth today – a part of the family - giving monthly. You can start as low as $10/month – on up! This is how we keep our doors open and pay our operating expenses. All non-profits work this way. No one is getting rich over here. (I, Richard Gage, am the only salaried employee and I receive only about half of my former pay as an architect. Everyone here is sacrificing – on a grand scale to bring the truth about 9/11)

So Gage isn't working on anything more substantial these days than putting up a folding table and hooking up the credit card machine.
 
And Richard is no longer working as an architect. I don't know if I've already posted that here, but a recent change to the fundraising page at AE911Truth makes it clear that Gage's sole line of income is his work for AE911Truth.



So Gage isn't working on anything more substantial these days than putting up a folding table and hooking up the credit card machine.

that link is disgusting
hes another trying to bank in while marching over the graves of thousands
look at this part
AE911 Truth Hero - $911.00 MONTHLY - 20 DVD's + 1000 of each card
i just puked in my mouth a little

who would pay thattttt?????
 
that link is disgusting
hes another trying to bank in while marching over the graves of thousands
look at this part

i just puked in my mouth a little

who would pay thattttt?????
Oh God. Seeing that brings to mind these infomercials.



 
Bingo.

"Coordination of all consultants ... structural ... and civil consultants."
--------------------------------------------------------
"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Winston Churchill

I notice the complete lack of any structural engineering software.
 

Back
Top Bottom