• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

AE911Truth Watch

Par, you need to explain the apparent quote in #259. Sounds like a B-Movie blurb.

ETA: didn't C7 help set a record for longest non-productive thread, or something? Or is that a different Chris-related-poster?
 
Last edited:
Christopher7 said:
Architect dodged the question, as you have.

No one has posted the name of a qualified person who has studied the evidence and the NIST report, and stated publicly that they support the NIST conclusion.
Click to expand...

This has to be one of the more stupid things I've seen here. You're suggesting that the authors of the NIST report (who are, by the way, qualified) do not count as supporters of the conclusions of said document until they satisfy some arbitrary standard you've set? Pathetic.
 
I don't know the technical term, but it's the Fallacy of "If only someone would listen to me."
 
SDC said:
There are several engineers, architects, and physicists, for example, who are regular posters here.
Click to expand...
There are several anonymous persons who claim to be engineers, architects and physicists but none will post their real names and proof of their qualifications.
 
Come on Chris. You can't be serious. Do you think the NIST report was written by Hollywood script writers?
 
No use in my posting mine because I make no such claims. But you are clearly making such claims. Should I ask?
 
Christopher7 said:
That's just a lame excuse to cover the fact that
YOU DON'T KNOW THE NAMES BECAUSE THE WHOLE THING IS A LIE!
Click to expand...

Absolutely pathetic, C7. Since you are so fond of defending that fraud site you cant see how its the RESPONSIBILITY of Gage's group to make sure that what he "claims' there is reflective of those who are "members" there. The fact that WE proved how pathetic his website is, and that HE continues to list fake people, only proves that HE isn't interested in making sure his "members" are legit; only that he has the #### so he can use his "appeal to authority" excuse.

I know the names, BECAUSE I was told what names were fake, and those FAKE names have been revealed over the two threads dedicated to exposing that fraud site

IF you have a problem with the fake names, maybe you should TELL GAGE and Plumb to do something about it?



Again, if you;re not the owner of the website, its none of your business as to what names are fake. The only thing you should be concerned about is WHY hasn't gage and plumb removed those names, or why they haven't bothered in checking the credentials of those in his list.
 
Last edited:
AZCat said:
This has to be one of the more stupid things I've seen here. You're suggesting that the authors of the NIST report (who are, by the way, qualified) do not count as supporters of the conclusions of said document until they satisfy some arbitrary standard you've set? Pathetic.
Click to expand...

This needs to be drilled into Chris's head.
 
AZCat said:
This has to be one of the more stupid things I've seen here. You're suggesting that the authors of the NIST report (who are, by the way, qualified) do not count as supporters of the conclusions of said document until they satisfy some arbitrary standard you've set?
Click to expand...
You think asking for an actual quote instead of just inferring something is an 'arbitrary standard'.
Please
 
LastChild said:
Don't worry about me I do fine and always have. Christopher7 is doing fine from what I can tell also and did make a good point. In fact the correct response to his post would be to agree like I did or post some expert quotes from your so-called vast consensus on the official conspiracy theory.

You also have a third choice...

shhhhhhhhhh
Click to expand...
How many on the AE list are still active? Give me current quotes or admit they are fake.
 
Christopher7 said:
You think asking for an actual quote instead of just inferring something is an 'arbitrary standard'.
Please
Click to expand...

It's THEIR REPORT. The NIST IS Their quote. You are using such a quintessential bogus debate tactic. It's beneath you.

Oh, and by the way. What are your qualifications to claim the NIST is a lie?
 
SDC said:
No use in my posting mine because I make no such claims. But you are clearly making such claims. Should I ask?
Click to expand...
I backed up my claim with a long list of quotes from qualified individuals.

You have not.
 
AZCat said:
This has to be one of the more stupid things I've seen here. You're suggesting that the authors of the NIST report (who are, by the way, qualified) do not count as supporters of the conclusions of said document until they satisfy some arbitrary standard you've set? Pathetic.
Click to expand...

I guess that means you don't have any. Now why did Kean and Hamilton write a book and give interviews about the 9/11 commission? Wasn’t everything said that needed to be said in the report? A report they further commented on when they washed their hands of it with their open letter declaring the investigation was obstructed. I wonder if they regret their earlier praise of it.

Now with so many thousands of experts declared to be part of this so-called consensus I always hear about you must be able to find some of them who have backed up the official version somewhere? No? Maybe they don’t want to risk having anymore regrets then they need to in light of what happen to Kean and Hamilton.

Pathetic is a good word for your lame excuses.
 
Last edited:
Well, another thread shot to heck. I'm not going to participate in a potential 10,000-poster. Good luck and to all, a good night.
 
Christopher7 said:
There are several anonymous persons who claim to be engineers, architects and physicists but none will post their real names and proof of their qualifications.
Click to expand...

In Architect's case, he's provided the moderators / administrators with documentation of his credentials. I'm prepared to do the same if need be, but I certainly don't see any reason why any of us should be beholden to provide personal information to you.

On a skeptic's forum, I would prefer to be judged by the content of my posts in either case.
 
Christopher7 said:
You think asking for an actual quote instead of just inferring something is an 'arbitrary standard'.
Please
Click to expand...

Inferring?! It's their report!

Maybe I shouldn't accept any of your posts as legitimate because the following doesn't appear at the bottom of every one:
My username is Christopher7 and I approve of this message.
Click to expand...
(with some sort of digital signature attached, of course)
 
twinstead said:
It's THEIR REPORT. The NIST IS Their quote.
Click to expand...
Who's report.

List the names of the people who actually signed off on the report, not the people who contributed to it.

List one qualified person who is not controlled by the Bush administration.

Oh, and by the way. What are your qualifications to claim the NIST is a lie?
Click to expand...
You and i are not qualified to say one way or another.
That's why i listed people who are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom