Stephen Jones was a professor of physics at a very conservative university for 20 years. He has 2 PhD's.
Richard Gage has been an architect for 20 years.
So what? I would bet that I could (should I be so inclined) find at least one doctor in the world who believes prayer can cure cancer, or one astronomer who believes little green men live on mars, or one marine biologist who believes Nessie exists.
I can most certainly point to a number of scientists who have made mistakes when their judgement has been clouded by their need for public recognition before the end of their careers.
And I can give a number of examples of architects who have failed miserably at their chosen profession.
They became involved with the "Truth Movement" after seeing some of the evidence.
No such
evidence exists.
Based on further investigation and their expertise, they have determined that the Tread Towers and building 7 could not have fallen the way they did without explosives.
About which they are demonstrably wrong and they are unable to even explain how these silent, invisible explosives came to be installed, survived the impacts and fires and were controlled.
Total fail
You have NO evidence that the core column was cut after the collapse.
All you have is suggestion and supposition.
Yet you say Stephen and Richard are "intellectually bankrupt".
A clear up was taking place. People carrying out the clear up had cutting tools.
Remaining steel members needed to be cut before they could be removed.
We have pictures of a column which has been cut.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm I wonder ......
You [all] say this kind of thing about anybody, no matter how qualified,
who says the official story is BS.
They fail to convince. They are a very small minority. Their methods are suspect. Their conclusions are even more suspect.
By engaging in relentless adolescent insults, you only expose your own intellectual bankruptcy.
No, we just don't take the 'truth' movement seriously. If you want to be taken seriously then present a coherent argument backed up by verifiable evidence.