AE911 Structural Engineer Says Nuclear Bomb Brought Down Towers

Max, I might not agree with your ideas on the WTC, but that was a grand joke. Well done.
 
I Couldn't really believe it until I heard it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksjJgC_lxso

Charles Pegelow, one of the few structural engineers in AE911, states the towers went down with a nuclear bomb. Any truthers want to defend this guy?

Nuke2.JPG


...Has anybody seen Manhatten? I could swear it was here just a few seconds ago...
 
Thats how disinfo operates. Since 2006, Pegelow has only been saying that there is a problem with the official story and that fire couldnt cause the collapse. Once he is accepted into ae911truth he starts about nuclear weapons to undermine them.

Judy Wood was the same. Had interviews with fetzer saying that explosives were to blame, then when she joins scholars she starts talking about DEWs to discredit Steven Jones.
Another nut case with a nut case idea; he is a perfect fit, all 9/11 truth is full of lies, fantasy and failed false conclusion.

This must mean you are a disinfo operator like the whole of 9/11 truth. You argue with your own group, and call them disinfo.
 
Can Troy take some medication or just piss off?

An appalling man, and not just because of that intensely annoying accent.
 
Walrus, the accent Troy is affecting is a character from a Comedy Central show, Crank Yankers. The show records actual prank calls from comedians to various businesses and then choreographs puppet routines to act out the prank calls. Troy is doing a very lame version of the character Special Ed, a mentally handicapped persona that will, for example, call up the Yahoo! customer service line and chant, "I've Got Mail! Yay! I've Got Mail" over and over and over again. The lameness of the impression is perhaps intentional and I was astounded that Pegalow didn't pick up on Troy dropping this half-hearted attempt at the Special Ed character as the call went on.

This is an aspect of this call that's worth mentioning however. Pegalow thought this guy was for real. He was suspicious at the very beginning of the call, but Troy calmed his fears and Pegalow bit hard. He was perfectly fine with talking absolute idiocy with someone who appeared to be mentally challenged. Even when Troy drops some of the pretense and starts asking some peculiar questions for a "truther", Pegalow doesn't get it. Is this a comment on how gullible Pegalow is, or on the types of people he's used to dealing with when it comes to the 9/11 Truth movement? Your call.

This is the tamest I've seen Troy act and it's pretty brutal. I don't condone the tactics at all, but even a broken clock...
 
Is it me or is anyone else finding these AE911 guys more humorous than some of the others.
 
Classic,
Troy asks him about what was found at the WTC complex in terms of physical evidence charles respondes
"you dont have to look at it from that standpoint"
WTF?
 
Coming soon: Astronomers for 9/11 truth pushing their claim of a mini super nova being the cause of the collapses....
 
Brain Sprain

Coming soon: Astronomers for 9/11 truth pushing their claim of a mini super nova being the cause of the collapses....

Surely a miniature black hole, this would explain emitted Xrays that made it look like a DEW, maybe Astrologers for 9-11 truth blaming it on a bad moon on he rise, or Disconauts for truth just blaming on the boogie
 
Don't even go there. At some point, someone will try to claim the LHC at CERN was used, sending gamma-gozer rays back in time to 2001.
 
Aa-HA! So that's how the Twin Towers were "built"! They didn't actually build them in the late 1960s/early 1970s, but transported them through time from 2001!

Well, I suppose a Delorean hitting 88mph would explain the flashes and bangs that people reported. The time warp would also explain all Gage's 'disappearing mass', the faster-than-freefall collapse, the BBC's early reporting of WTC7 falling and the hijackers turning up alive after they died. I think we might be onto something here.

So the question is, if someone stops the LHC from being activated, will the twin towers wink back into existence or disappear from history altogether??
 
Well, I suppose a Delorean hitting 88mph would explain the flashes and bangs that people reported. The time warp would also explain all Gage's 'disappearing mass', the faster-than-freefall collapse, the BBC's early reporting of WTC7 falling and the hijackers turning up alive after they died. I think we might be onto something here.

So the question is, if someone stops the LHC from being activated, will the twin towers wink back into existence or disappear from history altogether??


In one of the Space Beams threads I pointed out that a Flux Capacitor requires only a small fraction of the power that a steel-dustifying directed-energy weapon would. I think you're onto something here.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Thats how disinfo operates. Since 2006, Pegelow has only been saying that there is a problem with the official story and that fire couldnt cause the collapse. Once he is accepted into ae911truth he starts about nuclear weapons to undermine them.

Judy Wood was the same. Had interviews with fetzer saying that explosives were to blame, then when she joins scholars she starts talking about DEWs to discredit Steven Jones.

Lol. There goes theauthor again, just making stuff up.
 
Theauthor,
Using your logic the same could be said of say the CIT boys and their fantasy that filght 77 flew over the Pentagon.
Would you agree that CIT is disinfo?
 
Thats how disinfo operates. Since 2006, Pegelow has only been saying that there is a problem with the official story and that fire couldnt cause the collapse. Once he is accepted into ae911truth he starts about nuclear weapons to undermine them.

Judy Wood was the same. Had interviews with fetzer saying that explosives were to blame, then when she joins scholars she starts talking about DEWs to discredit Steven Jones.

Wouldn't saying explosives were to blame also discredit steven jones?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom