• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Adventures with AE911truth

I'd have to say it's padded room time for Doug...

Please get help, Doug. You'll receive no further teasing from me. Good luck to you.
 
Doug Plumb said:
You can research the European Union. Did you know they are considered guilty until proven innocent over there ?
Click to expand...

Can you point me to the unified EU criminal law that uses this convention?

Can you point to any unified EU criminal law?

(Hint: there isn't one).

In the UK (part of the EU) the presumption is innocence until proven guilty - in both the English and Scottish traditions. ETA: I'm confident that it's broadly similar in all the other EU member states.

Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_law

You aren't very good at this reality stuff, are you?
 
Last edited:
Doug Plumb said:
That explanation on 911Myths is stupid - like all their explanations.

You can watch the tape and plainly see its not bin Laden as he moves around.

911 Myths just picked an angle that makes him look something like bin Laden then picked a photo of bin Laden that most looks like this guy.
Click to expand...
That is not a refutation, that is sticking your fingers in your ears and going, "LALALA". If you can not provide a logically consistent, factual accurate refutation, just say so.
 
Bin Laden never looked like that when he walked around my living room, how bout the rest of you? Clearly a fake video. Anyone with half a brain that has had Bin Laden over for dinner knows there's no way that's him.
 
Doug Plumb said:
What two images are you referring to specifically ?

Anyone can look up the bin Laden confession tape and see the cat in that does not look like Usama.
Click to expand...

So are you ever going to answer his question, or are you just going to act like an idiot and pretend you didn't understand the question?
 
uk_dave said:
Tell me doug, when did you first realise ..... everything that you believe in right now? What was your epiphany?
Click to expand...

General Jack D. Ripper said:
Well, I, uh... I... I... first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love.

Yes, a uh, a profound sense of fatigue... a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I... I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence.

I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women uh... women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh... I do not avoid women, Mandrake.

But I... I do deny them my essence.
Click to expand...

Remind you of anyone?
 
Obtuse

Pronunciation: äb-'tüs, &b-, -'tyüs
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): ob·tus·er; -est
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin obtusus blunt, dull, from past participle of obtundere to beat against, blunt, from ob- against + tundere to beat -- more at [SIZE=-1]OB-[/SIZE], [SIZE=-1]CONTUSION[/SIZE]
1 a : not pointed or acute : [SIZE=-1]BLUNT[/SIZE] b (1) of an angle : exceeding 90 degrees but less than 180 degrees (2) : having an obtuse angle <an obtuse triangle> -- see [SIZE=-1]TRIANGLE [/SIZE]illustration c of a leaf : rounded at the free end
2 a : lacking sharpness or quickness of sensibility or intellect : [SIZE=-1]INSENSITIVE[/SIZE], [SIZE=-1]STUPID[/SIZE] b : difficult to comprehend : not clear or precise in thought or expression
synonym see [SIZE=-1]DULL[/SIZE]
- ob·tuse·ly adverb
- ob·tuse·ness noun
 
Last edited:
Doug Plumb said:
That explanation on 911Myths is stupid - like all their explanations.

You can watch the tape and plainly see its not bin Laden as he moves around.

911 Myths just picked an angle that makes him look something like bin Laden then picked a photo of bin Laden that most looks like this guy.
Click to expand...

Of course. Only an imbecile could mistake the man in these photos for the man at lower right.

879046797e80c6be7.jpg

​
 
HyJinX said:
Doug, are these two images of the same person?
Click to expand...

I'll ask you again, Doug, Is this the same person in both images? Yes or no?

ETA: What Gravy said.
 

Attachments

  • osama-tape-quality1.jpg
    osama-tape-quality1.jpg
    8.5 KB · Views: 0
  • binladen-gesture2.jpg
    binladen-gesture2.jpg
    20 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Well, it's the same hat.

But didn't osama always wear his rolex on his left ankle, except during jewish festivals?
 
Doug Plumb said:
No, he didn't confess. That taped confession shown on CNN had its main character that didn't even look like bin Laden. When I saw that tape for the first time my heart sank because I realized that many people would actually believe that was bin Laden.

The guy on the tape was 50 lb's overweight, had a "pug" nose as opposed to bin Ladens "ski slope nose" and had much darker skin than bin Laden.

Odly enough the audio was missing. That tape was someone else planning his daughters wedding for all we know.
Click to expand...


You're still using the "fatty" bin laden excuse? Its already debunked because of the different TV formats used in Afghanistan (Pal and SECAM) and then trans coded for America (NTSC), where the frame sizes are different? So when one translates video format to another format, the frames get resized to fit the standard for another country

http://www.muckrakerreport.com/id372.html
 
Doug Plumb said:
I have explained already why the building should not have collapsed and backed it up with solid indisputable evidence. The building was overbuilt to the point where the damage and heat caused by the plane crash should not have toppled the building.

This is backed up by observation and the fact that it was designed this way.

The building didn't topple either, it was blown up as easily shown in any of the videos of the "collapses" and collapsed straight down through itself rather than tipping as would be expected.
Click to expand...
The old Titanic syndrome. You did not show anything. The chief structural engineer of the WTC has already shown you to be wrong. You are wrong over 5 years. Wrong before you opened your mouth or posted.
 
Doug Plumb said:
Virtually all these organizations are controlled by globalists and if they go against the "government" (private international bankers) then they lose even more autonomy and possibly worse.
Click to expand...

Doug

Thanks for the reply, however you don't seem to have answered my point regarding a detailed, technical debate regarding your collapse hypothesis. As an engineer, you'll be aware just how complex these issues can be and I'm keen to look at your ideas in far greater depth. Given that your beliefs are so strongly held, I'm sure you'll wish to reciprocate.

I'm rather puzzled by your suggestion that IStructE, ICE, and the RIBA are controlled by third parties as each is, of course, a learned body composed solely of the respective professions. What gives me a particular problem is that I actually sit on the Professional Practice board of one of the UK institutes, and have seen no evidence to support your claim. Perhaps you could point me in the right direction?

Yours aye,

A.
 
Doug Plumb said:
I asked for actual evidence, not government commentary and fake confession tapes.
Click to expand...

This is an important admission: there is no evidence that will convince Doug. He is not scientific, he is not rational. The evidence will not change his mind, because he did not use the evidence to arrive at his conclusion.

Yeah, I know... big surprise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom