Addressing problems with the government's account

From earlier in the thread:

Myriad said:
The Truth Movement has discouraged any further official inquiry, by associating any call for such inquiry with the agenda of an irrational lunatic fringe that absolves terrorists of mass murder. This makes it political suicide for any U.S. politician who has (or aspires to) any public stature to support any further inquiry. That's the reality that you have helped to create.


Oh I forgot one. Some debunkers merely use 9/11 conspiracy as an excuse to make apologies for the present crooked administration and distract from their illegal war.


If you oppose the war, then why do you participate in a movement that makes opposition to the war more difficult? Why do you speak favorably of people who cost antiwar activists credibility and public sympathy, by showing up at antiwar protests to promote their own obviously irrational agenda?

Logically, if your movement is harming the antiwar effort, then you are either making a stupid mistake, or you support the war. It would be arrogant of me to suppose that you could possibly be making a stupid mistake. So, why do you support an illegal war? Is it out of fondness for the Bush administration? Do you hate Iraqis? Or do you just want to steal the oil?


I'm still curious about this, which LastChild did not respond to back on page 1 of this thread. To depersonalize the question: why would anyone whose concern is addressing problems with the government's account support a movement whose most notable public behavior is making accusations ("9/11 Was An Inside Job!") that have made it politically impossible to address problems with the government's account? Why would anyone whose concern is stopping the Iraq war support a movement that harms the credibility and effectiveness of anti-war activists?

Respectfully,
Myriad
 

Back
Top Bottom