• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

ADD/ADHD: real or ************?

Is ADD/ADHD a real disorder?

  • Yes, ADD/ADHD is a real disorder.

    Votes: 32 32.7%
  • No, ADD/ADHD is a fake disorder.

    Votes: 6 6.1%
  • ADD/ADHD is a real disorder, but it is over diagnosed.

    Votes: 47 48.0%
  • I don't know.

    Votes: 13 13.3%

  • Total voters
    98
Weighing in my own experience, I had behavioral issues as a child, and nobody who observed our home environment would accuse my parents of being negligent in behavioral correction or unwilling to face the problem. They tried just about everything in the book, including spanking, without real changes in the behavior, before the ADD was diagnosed. (at the time it was called MBD)

Once properly medicated (mine happened to be Ritalin) there was a sea of change in me. And I can firsthand express that it did not control my behavior, it allowed me to control it. This medication was given to me after careful medical evaluation and so much research on my parents' part that they usually wound up knowing more than some physicians about it.
 
http://www.studentpulse.com/article...sorder-addadhd-to-medicate-or-not-to-medicate


Home » Topics » Health Science » Featured Articles » Attention Deficit Disorder
Featured Article:
Understanding Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD/ADHD): To Medicate or not to Medicate?


By ILSE D. CARRIZALES
2010, VOL. 2 NO. 09 | PAGE 1 OF 6 | »
Keywords: ADHD Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Attention Deficit Disorder ADD ADD Medication FDA ADD ADHA Medicate

Introduction to Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD/ADHD)
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), also known as Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), has become increasingly prevalent in children and adolescents as the years have passed. Reports show that more than two million school-aged children are diagnosed with this neurobehavioral disorder that may transition with them into their adult lives (“ADHD-A Public”). ADHD is an important public health concern because it causes impairment in school performance as well as in socialization habits (Lesesne, Perou, and Brann). While there are many different ways to treat ADHD, such as counseling, therapy, and prescription medication, which is seemingly effective in helping children improve concentration, the question remains: should very young children, known to be naturally "hyper," be medicated for this condition? Currently, the effects of many drugs have not been studied in young children, which also leads to the question of whether the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should more stringently regulate the use of stimulant drugs given to children.


Although ADHD does not have an exact definition, a large number of scientists agree that ADHD is a biologically based disorder of the nervous system. People with ADHD show “symptoms of impulsiveness, inattentiveness, and hyperactivity” yet different problems are seen in children than in adults (“Preschool Attention” 1). According to a diagnostic manual that the American Psychiatric Association composed, there are three types of ADHD: inattentive, hyper-impulsive, and combined. A person that is diagnosed with ADHD “has trouble focusing on activities, organizing finishing tasks, and following instructions” (Bren). A child that is diagnosed with ADHD is said to be constantly running around and constantly active. He or she shows excessive emotions and usually speaks out of turn as well as says inappropriate things. Adults tend to multitask, are always restless and always act on impulse (Bren).
People with ADHD tend to have behavioral problems that sometimes lead to serious consequences. Children diagnosed with ADHD tend to visit the emergency room more often than those who do not have ADHD. Adolescents with ADHD are said to engage in risky behavior more often than those without ADHD and are also more likely to drop out of school. Adults with ADHD suffer from depression and anxiety more often than those adults without ADHD (Bren). According to Russell Barkley, director of psychology at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, “90 percent of ADD children are academic underachievers, 25 percent are held back at least one grade, 36 percent don’t finish high school (compared with 9 percent of the general population) and more than half have no friends during childhood” (qtd. in Koch). Statistics illustrate that 72 percent of boys and 68 percent of girls in juvenile detention centers suffer from ADD or ADHD. Those affected by ADHD are said to have higher auto accident rates and speeding tickets than those without ADHD (Koch).

ADHD and its Challenges: Diagnoses and Misdiagnoses
ADHD is a social problem that leads to many health and safety concerns. There are an estimated 2.5 million children and 1.5 million adults currently taking stimulant drugs to treat ADHD (Ginsberg). According the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), it is estimated that 3 to 5 percent of children residing the United States have ADHD. In other words, it is as if 1 out of 25 or 30 children have ADHD. Nora Galil, M.D., a psychiatrist in private practice in Washington, D.C., claims boys are also more commonly diagnosed than girls but this is rapidly changing. The reason boys are three times more likely to be diagnosed than girls is because symptoms are more easily recognized in boys. Boys are more active whereas girls tend to daydream and therefore go unnoticed (Bren).

The over diagnoses of ADHD as well as the over use of stimulant drugs to treat ADHD is a social problem affecting society today. Critics argue that the over diagnosis of ADHD causes the over prescription of stimulants, which pose serious health risks in the long term. On the other hand, ADHD experts and scientists say that while over diagnosing may occur in isolated cases, a greater number actually go undiagnosed and, therefore, go untreated (Koch). Over diagnosing ADHD is a common problem because currently no one test is able to determine if someone has ADHD but rather a specialist has to make the diagnosis. Paul Andreason, M.D., a drug reviewer in the FDA’s Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products states that since many health professionals believe that ADHD is being over-diagnosed, the history of patients should be considered by doctors before diagnosing them. Diagnosis is usually based on a comparison of “a person’s pattern of behavior against a set of criteria established by the American Psychiatric Association” (qtd. in Bren 3). A specialist can be a number of professionals such as a psychologist, psychiatrist, or even a developmental or behavioral pediatrician. ADHD is the most common diagnosis for children 3-5 years old, but not much is known about effects of medication on this age group (“Preschool Attention” 1).

The overdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of ADHD can cause harm to the child that is being diagnosed. While it is said that some stimulants help children with ADHD function better, the same stimulant might cause a child without ADHD to have negative results. According to Raymond Woosley, M.D., Ph. D., a clinical pharmacologist and vice president for Health Sciences at the University of Arizona, a child that is misdiagnosed may have a negative increase in blood pressure since a regular increase is seen normally in ADHD children that are taking stimulants. Woosley recommends that a child’s blood pressure and heart rate should be monitored closely for safety reasons (Bren 6).

Though there is speculation of overdiagnosis, the American Medical Association’s (AMA) Council on Scientific Affairs noted that there is an insufficient amount of evidence that points to overdiagnosis or misdiagnosis. A reason given for the rise of diagnosis was because the diagnostic criteria have been broadened and therefore more people are being diagnosed (Koch). A great number of times, children are diagnosed with ADHD when in reality they might just have dyslexia or something as simple as vision problems (Koch).
 
Exists? Almost certainly. Disorder? Not sure. In my (completely unqualified) opinion, it seems that more and more personality traits are being labeled disorders. We're getting closer and closer to labeling moderate introversion as high-functioning autism...

I'm not sure what you're perceiving is necessarily a bad thing. Subtract the word "traits" to include more than specifically personality traits, and we have "more and more traits are being labeled disorders". I think that makes sense and is a good thing, if a trait that proves detrimental becomes better understood. If I understand correctly, disorders that have a known chemical or other physiological cause are called "clinical" and those that are personality based, are called "personality disorders".

Is there something about labeling a problem a "disorder" that harms the response to it? To the contrary, noting specific patterns can give the benefit of experience to treating, managing, or correcting (depending on what is called for).

The temptation to dismiss the knowledge and claim the parents are just lax or too hesitant or too "politically correct", reminds me of the temptation to think that interrogating terror suspects can be done by a relative amateur as long as they have abandoned the scruples that supposedly hold them back from really getting results.
 
I think ADD is a symptom, not a disorder, of changes in our lifestyles over the last 40-50 years. People used to be able to let their children run outside from dawn until dusk but those days are over. Back then it didn't exist, and because of the culture, probably not noticed.

Not really true though. Kids had work to do at least for the vast majority of people for most if history.
 
ADD is real and it's increasing. The number of people with applied diligence disorder has been rising dramatically in recent years.

I suspect it's not so much that it's an increase in numbers of people having it as it is our ability to diagnose it. It wasn't that long ago that people with autism, Aspberger's, ADD, and social disorders were all lumped under the term "slow".

Working with Special Education for 4 years now I can say that I have first hand seen people try to get their kids diagnosed with "anything" so they can get services for their kids. Ex. I had my son diagnosed as ADD. He's not on medications and I have him labled so he qualifies for CTT and intervention services in his school.

I want these services and don't want to pay for them and as long as he is diagnosed he gets it. (I think they may have changed his disability to learning disabled though)they refuse services the kid needs etc.

If I am reading this right, you are practicing the very behavior you seem to decry in the first sentence. I happen to abhor this type and of action. There are two consequences you may have overlooked. First, you are doing your son a disfavor. I can't tell you how many kids I taught who came from public schools where they were teased about the "special classes" they attended, the extra tutoring, and other accommodations. Second, you are using up valuable resources that are needed for kids who come by their difficulties honestly.

If I have misunderstood your situation, I humbly apologize. But if my assessment is correct, then you are a perfect example of the source of the problem.
 
I think ADD is a symptom, not a disorder, of changes in our lifestyles over the last 40-50 years. People used to be able to let their children run outside from dawn until dusk but those days are over. Back then it didn't exist, and because of the culture, probably not noticed.

For the four millionth time: ADHD happens in adults too and doesn't always involve hyperactivity. In fact, if you magically removed the hyperactivity symptoms from every person with ADHD, 80% could still have attention disorders. (Those numbers refer to adults. Could be different in children I suppose.)

To be fair, I can't really blame you for the media's misrepresentation.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom