Maybe if someone sympathizes/empathizes...
INRM, just so you don't feel like everyone's picking on you, let me say that IF what you are a little too worried about was true, then I'd be concerned, also.
In fact, I really don't know if anyone here is in favor of this Administration or any Administration, bundling secret treaties up in black bags and pushing them through ratification at gunpoint.
BUT - other than your worries, you have showed nothing to indicate that this would be allowed to happen under our present form of government. Can you give one example of a treaty that was railroaded through over a holiday weekend and which did not have time for public scrutiny and Congressional oversight?
Treaties are negotiated by diplomats and/or field specialists appointed by their government or administration. This means they are given a certain amount of leeway, but not total authority. They do not negotiate in public, generally, nor through the press, internet or blogosphere. They are not necessarily automatically approved, either. What they sign off during the meetings still gets approval.
(Have you heard about Kyoto?)
Oh, and instead of repeatedly stating your opinion, you answered some of the direct questions. We get it, okay? You're not terribly subtle so we know what you're saying and where your obviously leading questions are leading. So instead of lecturing by restating your position over and over, why not try entering into a dialogue?
