But, regardless of exactly what teens are doing today, we know that they are having sexual intercourse more often than they used to.
It brings up two questions for me. First, why? I think that the saturation coverage of sex information, pornography, and sexually titillating media has something to do with it.
The second question is, is this a bad thing? It makes me uneasy, but, well, really, is it so bad? Let us pretend for a moment that birth control is pretty darned effective, and STDs are controllable. That's the message of this thread, isn't it? Don't teach abstinence, teach something that is more realistic. For those of us who don't believe that sex outside of marriage is a sin, what should we tell our kids about why they shouldn't do it?
It is something that as a parent of a future teenager, I have wondered about. For daughters, you can, and should, make sure they understand that he might love you right at that particular moment, but there's no guarantee he will still love you after you leave the car. That's human nature and always has been. But, what about sons?
Should fear of heartbreak when she dumps you after you've been having sex be a reason not to have sex? I've read lots of advice on the subject, and it all sounds pretty hollow. It is either, "It's dangerous because of pregnancy and STDs.", or "It's wrong."
Well, I don't believe the latter, and the former is somewhat exaggerated if the proper precautions are followed. I will rely on the former arguments, because I'm pretty sure my kid will be better off if I am encouraging him NOT to have sex, but I'm not convinced by my own arguments. How can he be convinced?