With respect to the data storage delay, my friend, this information TOTALLY proves it!
No, it doesn't. Just because something might be designed in a particular way doesn't mean it actually happened. I'm not saying you are wrong, just that you haven't proven anything. You are relying on how you believe it's designed (and making all sorts of misapplied assumptions in that, as well) and making no effort whatsoever to explain all the other evidence.
As I've said before, this "logic" is equivalent to claiming that OJ couldn't have committed murder because murder is illegal. That doesn't "prove" anything.
- Data is missing in the CSV file
- The Animation stops before impact to the Pentagon wall
That's a pretty significant observation don't you think?
Maybe for you because you have the mistaken belief that either was meant for forensic analysis. The CSV file is simply data generated for the purposes of being easy to plot. The animation's purpose isn't entirely known but it's known to contain numerous errors. It's certain that it wasn't made to be inch-accurate for forensic analysis.
In that light, neither piece of information is significant at all. Neither was meant to be analyzed in the way you are trying to analyze it. That means your analysis is assuming error conditions that simply aren't supported by the data. That means your analysis is flawed. That means it's not terribly significant.
Nothing has been skipped. There is no reason for data to be missing
because there is no reason for the power to be lost to the data recorder
before IMPACT.
Yes, there are numerous steps you have to pretend don't exist. You do this because all of these links in the chain can produce problems in your data and all of them are infinitely more plausible than you desired conclusion: "fabricated data". The data in the memory device didn't magically teleport to your computer.
RADALT is very important because it proves the aircraft was too high
to hit light poles and the Pentagon. Now that is has been extracted
and studied, it sort of takes a bite out of the official story doesn't it?
Yes, you THINK radalt shows this. We understand. We aren't arguing about what the RADALT says (mostly because you've never made the necessary tools available to check your work). We are arguing about what the time slip error is. This is an issue that you people continuously skirt with your "appeal to regulation" and other nonsense. The best part of it all is that you cannot even do that properly.
now that I'm starting to post credible sources for the FDR specs, I see
you're getting a little nervous. I'm not going to stop anything.
You want to debate this with me, let's do it.
Why should I debate with someone who makes stupid analogies and then refuses to stop? Your comparison to car equipment is so incredibly stupid that it makes me think you are incredibly stupid. So I've asked you to stop. Entirely because I'm trying to have a rational conversation with you and it's hard to have a rational conversation with someone making such incredibly inane attempts at logic.
You might also learn the proper internal workings of the FDR system.
Laugh.
I don't give two craps about you, nor your insults. You don't have anything that actually matters: evidence. If all you did was come here to
repeat the same tired arguments and troll then I won't be around to talk about it much longer.
Feel free to present something I haven't heard at least 20 times.
