AA77 FDR Data, Explained

I'm sure the bomb that PfT says damaged the Pentagon was triggered by an advanced device, the Fusion Activated Inter-dimensional Laser, the FAIL
At last, after two thousand years of research, the illudium Q-36 explosive space modulator. At last...
It is true, Marvin is as real as p4t tripe.

The illudium Q-36 explosive space modulator! That creature has stolen the space modulator!
... and the p4t evidence...
 
Heh, Swing Dangler thinks that the R_Mackey at ATS is the same R_Mackey here.

Swing, the R_Mackey at ATS is actually Balsamo. That's the kind of guy your hero is.
 
Last edited:
Cap'n Booby is now pretending he never said it may have been a MOAB, and he desperately tried to cover his tracks by deleting this claim when he could.

Unfortunately for him, Google cache knows all! He's "johndoeX" on the old LC forum: http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:EXY20R0TP-YJ:z15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php%3Fshowtopic%3D16736+%22Its+very+possible+the+attack+on+the+pentagon+was+some+type+of+bombing+run+with+some+type+of+MOAB.%22&cd=8&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Thank you for finding that Wildcat! So much for First Officer Bob's claims about not giving theories as to what happened.

P.S. Other than the PfT forums where is he pretending he never said that?
 
Last edited:
P.S. Other than the PfT forums where is he pretending he never said that?
At ATS he's posting under the oh-so-clever name "R_Mackey":
Cap'n Booby's sock said:
Hi Dr. P.

Although off-topic as usual, I am interested in this so I will reply.

Do you have a source link? I cannot find such statements on the P4T website, and we know from experience many people attempt to make things up which P4T never said.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread512723/pg18
 
Looks like they already have!

I'm pretty sure Imapepper is someone here, don't know who.

Funny how he's trying to say that johndoex is not Rob Balsamo. Typical Bob, using a lie in order to get out of another lie. Epic FAIL!
 
Last edited:
And Balsamo still goes by that name on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/johndoeXLC

He just added "lc" so people would know he's the jdx from the LC forum.

You know First Officer Bob is reading this.

Hey Bob, could you tell everyone why no one noticed a C-130 dumping a thirty foot bomb loaded with 18000lbs of explosives onto the Pentagon? Why did such a large bomb do relatively little damage given its size?

Maybe you could have one of your experts explain it. John Lear will probably say it was a hologram. Field McConnell will say the Canadians did it.
 
Last edited:
John Lear will probably say it was a hologram.
John Lear probably thinks a submarine from an underground base in Nevada traveled to Virginia and fired a torpedo at the Pentagon.

Yes, PfT expert John Lear actually thinks there is a submarine base in Nevada!
 
Field McConnell will say the Canadians did it.

Some already have:

However, unable to attribute any specific motive to Sweden, our attention was directed against the only country that did have a clear and obvious reason to stage an attack on the United States in precisely this manner: Canada.

Means, motive, and opportunity. Canada was very nearby, and could easily infiltrate operatives across the border. Their efficient state apparatus was much better equipped to pull off an operation of this magnitude than a group of terrorists half a world away. But what's more, it has long been known that Canada suffers under a debilitating inferiority complex, one that could easily have led to a virulent hostility against the very targets that were attacked on September 11.

http://www.revisionism.nl/Sept11/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm
 
I have never seen a MOAB explode, but I have seen several 3,000 Pounders explode in dense jungle. The shock wave radius is easily 1/2 mile or more.

FYI, IIRC, the minimum delivery altitude/speed for a Mk 82 Slick 500 lb bomb (no drag device) is about 1,000', 480 Kts +. The MOAB is typically delivered from a C-130 from about 10,000'.
.
Here 'tis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMSfD4roMxY
.
Notice the narrator say "nucular", so it's really true! :)
And, there WAS a C-130 in that event, ostensibly observing the whole thing, but in fact............. :)
 
Thanks for the video. When I said I have not seen one I meant for real. Video does provide a realistic perspective for bomb explosions.
 
There was also a C-130 at the TWA 800 event.
Coincidence or.........................................???
 

Back
Top Bottom