AA77 FDR Data, Explained

[jtribby]

I did go to Arlington. .

Great! So where are your interviews with Lagasse telling him he was wrong about were he saw the plane? Your interview with Brookes? ANC workers? Sean Boger? Terry Morin? Mr England?

You have any interviews with anyone? Any names?

Or was your trip to Arlington just to meet fellow JREFers who stroke your ego

Edited by Lisa Simpson: 

Edited to remove inappropriate remark.

 

[jtribby]

I've been toying with Balsamo for years, going back to before pft, back to his JDX days. Back when his prominent form of argument was emoticons. Back when I showed him how to add up post counts on the LC forum.

But then, you knew that already didn't you.

Certainly you have links to the conversations with Balsamo "toying with him" over the "years"?

Still waiting for you source your claim of Balsamo not having a job. But evasion noted.

 

[Hokulele]

The animation must match the CSV as it's a direct conversion of the raw data.

Why does it have to? When you are correlating the FDR data to the real world, there is manual intervention (as beachnut, Reheat, and others have described). Did you bother to follow the link to the Little Rock animation provided earlier?

Your insistence on only one interpretation of how the system should work (as opposed to how it does work) is getting a bit tedious.

Please all do yourselves a favour and learn more about CSV exporting.

I have four different software programs on this very machine. They all do raw data import/CSV export. All of them also do mapping functions that require manual input of correlation factors. Sure, certain sets of factors that are used often can be stored and loaded with a click of a button, but in order to ensure my calculations are correct, I need to know how to come up with the factors on my own, how to enter each one, how to spot when there are discrepencies, and what those might mean.

The fact that no one bothered to do that for this data simply means that no one bothered to do that for this data.

 

[T.A.M.]

So, you turned into the resident cheerleader day and night of those who spend their days and night obsessing over people they think are nuts.

Does that sound about right?

Yes Rob, nice reuse of the word you use to use when over at SLC blog. Only person to ever call me it.

Consider yourself reported for investigation.

TAM

 

[BCR]

Or was your trip to Arlington just to meet fellow JREFers who stroke your ego (and perhaps other things.. sorry, couldn't resist).

Actually, I was rather busy talking to police officers, eyewitnesses, and in general people who knew something about the attack. I met them at Lynn Spencer's (she is a real pilot) event without knowing who they were. My conversations with them were via email after my return to compare notes, only to learn we actually had met

You have not been paying attention obviously, because I did post a few which were relevant, but most I did not because of CIT. I have no desire to expose innocent by-standers to the CIT lunacy and character assassination. However, the ACPD interviews and dispatch audio was made available. Sorry you missed it.

 

[DavidJames]

Certainly you have links to the conversations with Balsamo "toying with him" over the "years"?

Still waiting for you source your claim of Balsamo not having a job. But evasion noted.

I don't have a source for my belief Rob doesn't have a job, it's just common sense. People with intelligence, integrity, skills and emotional maturity are having trouble getting jobs. Rob, who has none of those attributes hasn't a chance. Except trying to scam losers, the gullible and those equally intellectually challenged.

Goodbye and I look forward to your next incarnation.

 

[BCR]

Certainly you have links to the conversations with Balsamo "toying with him" over the "years"?

Still waiting for you source your claim of Balsamo not having a job. But evasion noted.

But you ARE Balsamo, quit talking about yourself in the 3rd person. Makes you sound loony.

 

[beachnut]

Caustic Logic? The guy is a janitor!

Janitors and lying Tour Guides. But no one verfied as having any experience in aviation. What's next, Drug addicts who attempt debunk Architects and Engineers? oh, wait...

Balsamo is not an airline pilot. He is a seller of lies on DVD. Hi bob

Do the kids next door let you use the tall goal?

Bob you never could keep your cool long enough to spew more than the standard no theory junk.

FDR errors? Explain? PA, who was giving the PA class?

Going down to 25 in Atlanta tonight Bob, better get out the jacket. What are you doing in Ga? Do they let terrorists apologist live that close to a base?

 

[dtugg]

Cap'n Bob, did you think that nobody would figure out that it's you?

And did you say hi to Craig for me yet? If not, please do so.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

I don't have a source for my belief Rob doesn't have a job, it's just common sense. People with intelligence, integrity, skills and emotional maturity are having trouble getting jobs. Rob, who has none of those attributes hasn't a chance. Except trying to scam losers, the gullible and those equally intellectually challenged.

Goodbye and I look forward to your next incarnation.

I don't have a source for my belief that most debunkers here at JREF don't have a job, it's just common sense. People with intelligence, integrity, skills and emotional maturity are having trouble getting jobs. Debunkers who have none of those attributes don't stand a chance. That and the fact that most of them are here day and night seven days a week. Some might come to the conclusion that this is their job.

But that's just crazy. Who would pay for this half-ass effort? Especially in this economy?

 

[T.A.M.]

I don't have a source for my belief that most debunkers here at JREF don't have a job, it's just common sense. People with intelligence, integrity, skills and emotional maturity are having trouble getting jobs. Debunkers who have none of those attributes don't a chance. That and the fact that most of them are here day and night seven days a week. Some might come to the conclusion that this is their job.

But that's just crazy. Who would pay for this half-ass effort?

oh and bob, in case you were wondering, the above is a quote from the resident TRUTHER cheerleader.

TAM

 

[Baylor]

Craig and Aldo never claimed to be experts on anything.

Then you might want to change this on your website bob-o.

Eyewitness Experts
Aldo Marquis
Craig Ranke
Domenick DiMaggio
ThePentaCon - Citizen Investigation Team

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core

 

[Gravy]

Then you might want to change this on your website bob-o.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core

Oh, snap!

 

[Baylor]

oh and bob, in case you were wondering, the above is a quote from the resident TRUTHER cheerleader.

TAM

And what are this resident truther's thoughts of the claims of pffft and "Citizen [sic] Investigation Team"?

I don't know if it just bores me or what but I can never understand what this whole NOC crap is all about.

And I read almost anything about 9/11.

 

[jtribby]

I don't have a source for my belief....

So, you admit you have zero proof for your claim and it's all based on "belief"? You may want to also click the link in Wimpy's post of argument from incredulity as you also attempt character assassination of someone you know nothing about, just like Funk tried when he didn't even know Balsamo was qualified to fly.

I thought this place was based on critical thinking, not belief... wow.

 

[T.A.M.]

And what are this resident truther's thoughts of the claims of pffft and "Citizen [sic] Investigation Team"?

Look HI may be the resident truther cheerleader, but even he has his limits. I mean he is, if nothing else, sane.

TAM

 

[Mr.Herbert]

Then you might want to change this on your website bob-o.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core

Ouch

 

[jtribby]

Yes, we know. Everyone who comes here to argue points of CIT or P4T are Craig or Rob or Turbofan.

Heck, I'm sure if you say it enough even the mods will believe it and ban on a technicality without any proof as they did TLB?

Still doesn't change the fact that the NTSB doesn't claim any errors your so-called "experts" claim who cannot be verified as experts.

Looking through this thread, every single "troofer" has been banned. Not for personal attacks, not for being impolite, but for accusations of socks sans proof.

Makes you all look really good to lurkers.

 

[T.A.M.]

well if they were banned, then the accusations were true. So really, what you are saying to the lurkers, is that the debunkers here report people who violate the rules of the forum.

Well, drat, I guess we are gonna look some bad to dem der lurkers now, isnt we.

TAM

 

[dtugg]

We all know that you are Cap'n Bob, you haven't even denied it. Personally, I would prefer that you don't get banned. The forum is a funnier place with you guys around. It sure was before Craig's sock got banned.