No. That is YOUR problem. The fact they these witnesses are all disconnected
and STILL magically, somehow drew the same flight path is AMAZING.
They simply do not all have the same flight path. they all say north of the Citgo but hell, a plane flying over my house is also north of the Citgo.
Where are the other interviews that craig did which he won't release? Do any of them put the plane where the lamp post damage puts it? How about the people who do, or the people who witnessed it actually hit the building. How can you possibly complain about a "big picture" when you are ignoring the picture with the detail all witnesses agree on? The one very definitive intersection of all flight paths. The single most awe creating detail, the single most memorable detail, the single most important detail. The plane hit the building!!!
Understand the odds and improbability of this.
Of what? That people's memories are affected by how quickly an event occurs and how emotional a particular detail would be?
In that case the odds of divergent descriptions of the flight path are quite good, thus while most put it on a straight path from the top of the hill on Columbia Pike and into the building, some describe it elsewhere. I already pointed out that if several of the paths on your diagram were true then neither Morin or Paik could ever have seen the plane. Are you then willing to dismiss those paths and the statments the witnesses gave? Or will you dump Morin and Paik?
Does everyone who states the plane was along the path that the downed poles shows get branded a liar, mistaken, or Craig's favorite, an agent?
The single most emotional detail and the single most memorable one would be the impact and given that that is where the flight path ends the witnesses would have kept their sight on that particular spot the longest and thus this is the most convergent point in all witness statements.
Thus the odds favor the detail of impact being correct and the odds of divergent descriptions of the path the plane took to get to that point.
What are the odds that a large loud and fast aircraft flies over a building low and no one sees it occur? What are the odds that 'agents' scurrying about with highway lamp posts are also seen by no one? What are the odds of an explosion occuring at the Pentagon wall would move a large gen-set towards the wall?
I also note that you have no comment on the video taped fact that Craig led Turcois to change his description of the flight path not once, not twice but at least three times.
dtugg: Are you going to change your mind when the story hits the news?
I believe that the point was that it hit the news and then be commented upon by recognized experts in the feild. However there is also the point that PfT has utterly failed to compile a consise technical description of how they arrive at the conclusion that the FDR data illustrates a grossly different path than that of the pattern of downed lamp posts.
I'll wait for him to back up his statements with his real name instead of
a faceless account.
Until then, he has zero FDR experience and his theory no longer makes
sense based on these points:
ah yes the old, you-are-not-an-expert-unless-we-know-your-name ploy.
I remind you that YOU contacted him in the first place touting him as an expert. now that he has repeatedly pointed out that you misunderstand and or misrepresent the statements that he has made and steadfastly maintained that data can be lost/corrupted you are getting peeved. If you do not consider him an expert why do you continue to try to re-engage him? Why not compile a full consise technical paper on this matter and submit it to organizations with access to recognized experts? You are concentrating on internet personae who you maintain are not expert enough to make any comment of the matter, why?
- a transient on a data line, or address line cannot issue an erase
process
Addressed in previous posts.
- EEPROM requires DC voltage over a sustained duration to reset
gates, as opposed to a few milliseconds of noise
,,, and???
- The gates require a minimum DC voltage to reset. As power decays
this voltage is no longer sufficient. Gates cannot be reset by impact
force, it's done electrically.
You really do not understand that the conditions present at this point in time are by no means at all neccessarily 'normal' do you?
- The firmware determines which address lines are enabled and when
the write/erase occurs. It is an involved and complex set of instructions -
not a single 'switch' feature.
see last comment
