• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Split Thread AA77 FBI Investigation [split from: AA77 FDR Data, Explained]

You still have yet to prove that this wasn't enough time. .

There is no other major terrorist crime scene that the FBI only worked for 5 days.

You have yet to provide evidence of a similar terrorist attack where everything was known via eyewitness statements and the debris that was already moved from the crime scene to another location.

1. Eyewitness testimony is very unreliable.

2. Still no reports that match debris found to the plane.

3. Please show how much, what kind and where the debris was moved to.
 
Last edited:
Please show me a major terrorist crime scene that the FBI only worked for 5 days.

The on-site investigation for the 1993 WTC bombing was done in a couple days.

For all of these events, lhe lan and shoe-leather investigation for these things goes on for weeks or months or years.

You have nothing, nothing.
 
The on-site investigation for the 1993 WTC bombing was done in a couple days.

Show me proof of this.

You have nothing, nothing.

Look at the following facts.

1. Eyewitness testimony is very unreliable.

2. Still no reports that match debris found to the plane.

3. Please show how much, what kind and where the debris was moved to.
 
Please show me a major terrorist crime scene that the FBI only worked for 5 days.

U1 - can you please tell us, using your analytical NSA knowledge, experience and security access, what the FBI established within those '5 days' at the 'crime scene'.
 
U1 - can you please tell us, using your analytical NSA knowledge, experience and security access, what the FBI established within those '5 days' at the 'crime scene'.

We do not know what they established since they have not released the crime scene reports yet.
 
So you still cannot show any other FBI crime scene that they worked for 5 days.
You cannot show another terrorist scenario where everything was already known via other means and the crime scene investigation lasted longer than 5 days. You're the one making the claim. The onus is on you to back it up.
 
You cannot show another terrorist scenario where everything was already known via other means and the crime scene investigation lasted longer than 5 days.


As stated again and again, even if they thought they knew what happened they still had to do a complete criminal investigation.

Just like CSI does with a murder investigation even though they might have witnesses and clues as to what happened.
 
Last edited:
So you still cannot show any other FBI crime scene that they worked for 5 days.

Roger, you have been shown time and time again where the FBI continued to work at the location. Just because it goes against your conspiracy theory is no need to ignore the fact that they were still there...sifting thru evidence.

Why are you afraid of that fact?:confused:
 
Roger, you have been shown time and time again where the FBI continued to work at the location.

You have been shown and proven by several sites that the FBI only worked the crime scene for 5 days.

Just because it goes against your conspiracy theory is no need to ignore the fact that they were still there...sifting thru evidence.

Why are you afraid of that fact?:confused:

What conspiracy, please show me what conspiracy i have talked about?

Why are you afraid of the fact that the FBI only worked the crime scene for 5 days?
 
wow, am I talking to a parrot? Hahaha!

Your very own link states that the FBI was still sifting thru evidence.

But thats ok, you can keep believing your fantasy. Its not like you've helped the truther movement after, oh, 8 years or so :D
 
Your very own link states that the FBI was still sifting thru evidence.

You have been shown and proven by several sites that the FBI only worked the crime scene for 5 days.

Why do you keep avoiding this fact?
 
You have been shown and proven by several sites that the FBI only worked the crime scene for 5 days.

Ultima, we don't care what websites have to say. Those are called secondary sources, not primary. In other words, it is someone reporting on what a primary said (someone or some document). I just gave you dozens of PRIMARY sources to prove beyond any doubt you don't know what you are talking about.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom