A Study of Communism

Bow wow woof woof.

You are much like Shanek. You require others to AGREE with you, not merely debate with you.

Ah, so now I'm like Shanek in that I require others to agree with me. Where do you read that? Can you cite any supporting text? Gosh, my last two or three posts to you have emphasized not agreement, but you supporting your disagreement, which you've repeatedly failed to do.

I will say this though, at least Shanek quotes text and then responds, keeping things on relatively on topic (at least when he's not calling someone a liar). You can't even do that. You're a gasbag.

[insert my above post here]
 
Cain said:


I will say this though, at least Shanek quotes text and then responds, keeping things on relatively on topic (at least when he's not calling someone a liar). You can't even do that. You're a gasbag.


You're a malicious troll, who as admitted functioning as a rhetorical bully. Nothing you say or do has any meaning beyond your attempt to extend your range of extorted behaviors.

Shanek, just like you, routinely distorts and avoids questions that don't suit him, and then accuses others of being a "liar" or a "bigot" when they disagree with him.

You ignore germane responses, and then complain that you haven't been replied to, unless you LIKE the response. You're no different on a very fundamental level. You are incapable of discousre, you function only as a bully and aggressor, and you appear to have no function other that to poison the well.
 
Shanek, just like you, routinely distorts and avoids questions that don't suit him, and then accuses others of being a "liar" or a "bigot" when they disagree with him.

Gosh, that sounds much closer to your behavior.

You ignore germane responses, and then complain that you haven't been replied to, unless you LIKE the response.

Which germane responses have I ignored? I think I followed up on very nearly every single posted directed at me. Read through the thread for once. See for instance Skeptic's second reply to me. He ignores most of the issues raised, and then degenerates into attacking motives and nothing else. Troll wanted me to state an example of U.S. imperialism. I re-stated one previously mentioned, and he never followed up (for whatever reason). The list goes on.

Now, I've documented a few things you've utterly failed to respond to. Have you answered meaningfully (or at all)? Answer: no.

You're no different on a very fundamental level. You are incapable of discousre, you function only as a bully and aggressor, and you appear to have no function other that to poison the well.

You're the one who can only call me a troll, unethical and so on. You haven't even pretended to respond to the arguments at hand. Oh, but I'm such a "bully" for, um, insisting on sticking to the central facts.

I believe Freudians refer to your last few posts as cases of "projection".
 

Back
Top Bottom