A question for Jedi Knight

[Lord Kenneth]

Methinks JK loves fooling around on these boards.

 

[Tricky]

He's a delusional misogynist who justifies violence against women. Don't know why any one puts up with him.

Indeed. Not only is battering okay, but a man is justified in killing women if they have been unjust to him, like giving him a failing grade.

Sadly, I think Jedi seriously believes that women deserve whatever punishment a man gives them.

 

[gnome]

Re: Re: Re: Re: A question for Jedi Knight

Batter (in terms of women's reality in America)--1. Mixture of flour, milk, etc. For baking a cake.

Batter (in terms of men's reality in America as the true victims)--1. Strike Repeatedly 2. Injure by hard use (by women and the matriarchal terror apparatus)

JK

Once again, the process of communication has broken down. JK, simply and clearly, do you believe that any female in America has ever been the victim of an act of violence by any male?

 

[rikzilla]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A question for Jedi Knight

Once again, the process of communication has broken down. JK, simply and clearly, do you believe that any female in America has ever been the victim of an act of violence by any male?

I personally have had my ass kicked while trying to stop my step dad from beating the crap out of my mom. This happened many times. This same step dad got me drunk on rum and cokes on my 13th birthday, and I almost died choking on my vomit in my sleep. Nice guy. Very responsible.

Yeah, there are battered women...and a $hitload of battered kids as well. I don't know where JK is coming from on this issue???

I think perhaps he has the more virulently hardcore elements of radical feminism in mind. He needs to realize that although the feminist nuts are...well...nuts...they were not created in a vacuum. Theirs is a reaction to a real problem. It's an unhealthy reaction. (Feminists are attempting to reshape the entire social fabric in their image.) It's an overreaction. The problem exists, but can be dealt with under existing law. Feminists are zealots with an agenda....I don't think they care as much about solving real domestic violence issues as they do in pushing their social agenda. Otherwise why were radical feminists among the largest supporters of Bob Packwood and Bill Clinton?? They obviously were willing to support sexual predators as long as their social agenda was served.

-z

 

[Q-Source]

Feminists are not directly responsible to deal with domestic violence. Reducing violence against women (and children) comes just as a side-effect of the feminists' intention, which is to increase the women's role in their society.

In the long run, battered women and children are not only a problem for the people involved in a dysfunctional family but also they are a problem for our societies. For example, we have to deal with those children who grow and become resentful and violent men.


Q-S

 

[Crossbow]

Jedi Knight sounds like the kind of person who would get along well with my one grandmother.

Some years ago, after my mother got beaten by her husband, she called her mother (the grandmother in question) and told her about the experience.

To which my grandmother asked, "Well? What did you do that made him hit you?".

 

[Jedi Knight]

Feminists are not directly responsible to deal with domestic violence. Reducing violence against women (and children) comes just as a side-effect of the feminists' intention, which is to increase the women's role in their society.

In the long run, battered women and children are not only a problem for the people involved in a dysfunctional family but also they are a problem for our societies. For example, we have to deal with those children who grow and become resentful and violent men.


Q-S

What violent men? I think that is a feminist myth.

JK

 

[Guest]

What violent men? I think that is a feminist myth.

JK

Give JK a break, everyone. You'd be a little twisted too if girls had been beating you up all your life.

 

[gnome]

I will be perfectly happy to shut up once JK makes his views perfectly clear and accepts the consequences to people's opinion of him.

JK... once again you prove incapable of answering a simple yes or no question.

Simply and clearly, do you believe that any female in America has ever been the victim of an act of violence by any male?

 

[Q-Source]

JK... once again you prove incapable of answering a simple yes or no question.

Simply and clearly, do you believe that any female in America has ever been the victim of an act of violence by any male?

You are wasting your time.

JK will probably say no to your question. However, he won’t provide evidence of his outrageous claims because he has no evidence at all. Everything comes from a misogynist mind.

 

[Jedi Knight]

You are wasting your time.

JK will probably say no to your question. However, he won’t provide evidence of his outrageous claims because he has no evidence at all. Everything comes from a misogynist mind.

No, I just do not believe feminist matriarchal totalitarian pseudo-propaganda. It would be like believing in ghosts or the paranormal.

JK

 

[jj]

What violent men? I think that is a feminist myth.

JK

Jedi, I used to be a campus cop while I was in school. Given my experience alone, I can easily rebut your claim that no woman in the USA has been abused.

You are, by the way, partially right about men being abused, physically or sexually. It is much more unusual, BUT WHEN IT HAPPENS THE SUPPORT "teams" THAT EXIST DID NOT, AT LEAST IN 1975, KICK INTO GEAR, in fact they treated the male victim more like an abuser than a victim. The police (city) refused to even take a report in at least one case.

 

[gnome]

It is clear to me that JK refuses to answer the question directly, which I have asked several times and could not have put in less ambiguous terms.

From this I conclude either

1. He knows that what he says was untrue, but refuses to publicly admit a lie.

2. He believes what he says was literally true, but refuses to subject himself to criticism by affirming it clearly.

I cannot think of any other possibility. In any case, I think it is amply demonstrated that JK has no interest in the accuracy of his own statements, or in any form of rational debate, or even acknowledging his own statements. Therefore I now put this coward troll on my ignore list permanently.

I don't expect him to care.

 

[gnome]

You are, by the way, partially right about men being abused, physically or sexually. It is much more unusual, BUT WHEN IT HAPPENS THE SUPPORT "teams" THAT EXIST DID NOT, AT LEAST IN 1975, KICK INTO GEAR, in fact they treated the male victim more like an abuser than a victim. The police (city) refused to even take a report in at least one case.

This is unfortunate and I hope it is not widespread. Frankly, I believe that policeman should have been fired for not doing his job.

 

[Q-Source]

No, I just do not believe feminist matriarchal totalitarian pseudo-propaganda. It would be like believing in ghosts or the paranormal.

Are you suggesting that Rikzilla and Lisa testimonials are part of

the feminist matriarchal totalitarian pseudo-propaganda???

 

[subgenius]

Are you suggesting that Rikzilla and Lisa testimonials are part of

the feminist matriarchal totalitarian pseudo-propaganda???

Refusing to see what's there to be seen is delusional. That would be sad enough, but to espouse this crap helps to rationalize violence, but that's been pointed out above and many times elsewhere. Its intolerable and sickening. Not even amusing. Someone get him to an abused women's shelter. Make him tend to their injuries. Suppose there's no abused children either, since there's no violent men. All men in prison for assaults are victims of the conspiracy.
All his "opinions" (a valid opinion is based on facts) have the same crediblity.

 

[DrChinese]

Refusing to see what's there to be seen is delusional. That would be sad enough, but to espouse this crap helps to rationalize violence, but that's been pointed out above and many times elsewhere. Its intolerable and sickening. Not even amusing. Someone get him to an abused women's shelter. Make him tend to their injuries. Suppose there's no abused children either, since there's no violent men. All men in prison for assaults are victims of the conspiracy.
All his "opinions" (a valid opinion is based on facts) have the same crediblity.

Yea, and don't forget - it's the victim's fault. That's the one that always drives me crazy.

 

[Q-Source]

Refusing to see what's there to be seen is delusional. That would be sad enough, but to espouse this crap helps to rationalize violence, but that's been pointed out above and many times elsewhere. Its intolerable and sickening. Not even amusing. Someone get him to an abused women's shelter. Make him tend to their injuries. Suppose there's no abused children either, since there's no violent men. All men in prison for assaults are victims of the conspiracy.
All his "opinions" (a valid opinion is based on facts) have the same crediblity.

Right.

However, I do not think that Jedi has no knowledge about those abused women's shelter. He probably does.

That is why I just find very strange that a middle-age adult like Jedi can express such extremist thoughts about his own country and about social reality.

Q-S

 

[Q-Source]

Bump

 

[Lothian]

That is why I just find very strange that a middle-age adult like Jedi can express such extremist thoughts about his own country and about social reality.

Q-S

It is only strange if you don’t consider him to be trolling.