• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

A new, appalling truther site

Bitca

Student
Joined
Feb 17, 2016
Messages
34
The site I speak of is bazantmisconduct dot com and, as the title suggests, goes beyond the usual truther nonsense to actively attacking Bazant. Its mission statement is

This website attempts to provide sufficient information to encourage a campus wide discussion at Northwestern University as to whether Professor Zdenek Bazant’s published work on the fall of the WTC towers on 9/11/01 should be a cause for university wide concern.

and includes such gems as

His first paper on this matter, written with one of his graduate students, was submitted to peer review TWO DAYS after 9/11. While this does not show that he began the paper before 9/11/01, that possibility should be considered.


The "research" papers he lists that take issue with Professor Bazant's theory include are mostly from JONES, including Tony Szamboti's missing jolt paper and David Chandler's execrable 2010 paper. He also includes two Jonathan Cole gems.

I've crossed paths with David Slesinger, the creator of the website, on Quora. He is usually very polite (unlike the other truthers there) and pretends he wants to start a dialog with people, but of course he's a true believer who wants to proselytize. He claims to know at least basic physics but ducks anything concrete. I actually got him to acknowledge that things don't fall at a constant acceleration of 2/3 g, but then he quickly said he'd have to consult with Tim Eastman. (He knows some of the major players, such as Chandler, Eastman, and MacQueen.)

There are lots of truther sites, of course, but one dedicated to trashing a man is a new low for me. So I thought I'd bring it to your attention.
 
http://bazantmisconduct.com/


Bazant might of done his first draft on a napkin, Bazant like guys can fill blackboards with equations without notes...

What an idiotic web site - a legacy of woo


How can 9/11 truth nuts get nuttier? See bazantmisconduct.com or, Link Bazant to the inside job fantasy
 
Last edited:
Welcome Bitca!

Beachnut said it well. Idiotic. Pure woo. It's always irritating when someone well educated promotes nonsense, because there are always people who assume they must know what they are talking about.

No.
 
http://bazantmisconduct.com/

For those whose expertise lies outside the realm of hard science, we offer these links to two 10 minute videos by a practicing civil engineer about conservation of momentum. Newton’s Laws, including conservation of momentum, are usually taught in high school.

Two videos by Cole. This is sad. Guess David Slesinger failed to take high school physics.
 
I just finished reading Galileo's middle finger by Alice dreger, who has defended many others in academia who have been harassed and had their careers tarnished. Maybe he should contact her. Incidentally she used to be at northwestern, he probably knows her.
 
Thanks, Beechnut. I'm not allowed to post links yet. Guess I better participate more instead of lurking.

Turns out good old Tony S announced the site at debate politics.

David's also been "truthing" since 2002, first on ae911truth, and now on 911truth. (The difference being there are no architects or engineers on the latter?)

And, oh my, I just stumbled on this earlier site, also by Slesinger: ChallengingChomsky, which includes this bit:

David plans to perform an act of nonviolent civil disobedience at a yet to be determined venue, and, if charged with trespass, plead guilty and serve time in jail in an effort to touch Prof. Chomsky heart.

He is, or was, the "operations manager for the NineElevenTruthCoin". Anyone hear of that?

It's kind of pathetic that he's wasted 14 years of his life on this stuff. And that I spent a fair amount of time over the past 3 months or so trying to have a sane conversation with him. :(


URL's added by your friendly, neighborhood moderator.
Posted By: Loss Leader
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Under "Research papers which take issue with Professor Bazant’s theory of the collapses", there's just one which is not a truther site.

I followed the link. I'd say it's interesting for structural engineers. It basically consists of experiments showing that the energy dissipation of a buckling column as it develops hinges may have been underestimated by Bazant. That's not even remotely similar to a "misconduct". I also note that the first listed co-author has collaborated with Szamboti in the "Missing Jolt" paper.

And of course, I can't help noticing there's a donation button.
 
Is it 84 % of Americans who now believe the Official 9/11 report is nonsense ?
Those who haven't followed the money look increasingly foolish .
How soon before the conspiracy deniers will be regarded in the same way as sane people regard Holocaust deniers ?
 
Is it 84 % of Americans who now believe the Official 9/11 report is nonsense ?Those who haven't followed the money look increasingly foolish .
How soon before the conspiracy deniers will be regarded in the same way as sane people regard Holocaust deniers ?
Where did you get this figure? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Is it 84 % of Americans who now believe the Official 9/11 report is nonsense ?
lol, so your make up fake numbers so you can follow the crowd who can't figure out 9/11 after 14 years? Stand up and be an individual...
Those who haven't followed the money look increasingly foolish .
How much did the knives cost?
How soon before the conspiracy deniers will be regarded in the same way as sane people regard Holocaust deniers ?
Good to see you don't deny the Holocaust; some 9/11 truth followers do. Guess getting the Holocaust right and 9/11 wrong puts you at 50 percent for reality.

But did you have something to add on the case of the dolt who started the Bazant attack web site - follow the money, the guy is asking for donations to attack Bazant. Keep up the failed 9/11 truth claims; it takes massive lack of knowledge to believe 9/11 truth claims. Seems most 9/11 truth followers are over qualified.


Love the irony...
Those who haven't followed the money ... look increasingly foolish .
 
Last edited:
Is it 84 % of Americans who now believe the Official 9/11 report is nonsense ?
Those who haven't followed the money look increasingly foolish .
How soon before the conspiracy deniers will be regarded in the same way as sane people regard Holocaust deniers ?

Seeing the only people who you have have proven themselves, and even openly admitted
They were intellectually dishonest, who care?
 
The current AE911T led smear campaign against Bazant reminds me very much of their NIST Fraud smear compaign from two years ago and is likely to be even less effective.

Northwestern University actually spells out what constitutes misconduct quite clearly:

Research misconduct is defined as fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or other serious deviation from commonly accepted practices in the relevant scientific community for proposing, performing or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences in opinion.

Simple. Disagreement does not = misconduct.
 
Is it 84 % of Americans who now believe the Official 9/11 report is nonsense ?
Those who haven't followed the money look increasingly foolish .
How soon before the conspiracy deniers will be regarded in the same way as sane people regard Holocaust deniers ?

Not even close to 30% and most of them live in their parent's basements eating Cheez Whiz and candy bars while fapping to their favorite online places that use their idiocies to sell them crap for survival planning. And trying to beat each others tales of the evul konspericey people..........http://www.amazon.com/Galileos-Midd...3329&sr=1-1&keywords=galileo's+middle+fingere this helps you!!!
 
Is it 84 % of Americans who now believe the Official 9/11 report is nonsense ?
Those who haven't followed the money look increasingly foolish .
How soon before the conspiracy deniers will be regarded in the same way as sane people regard Holocaust deniers ?

It's all over pal. Truthers are viewed with the same level of contempt as Holocaust and Moon landing deniers by practically everyone who doesn't get their news from Russia Today. And rightfully so.
 

Back
Top Bottom