shemp
a flimsy character...perfidious and despised
Why? Because you just might get goatsed! (WARNING: Some text may be NSFW. Page links to, but does not display, NSFW image.)
It's better than using tinyurl (http://tinyurl.com/yjaqhb).
At least you can see where you're going if you hover over the link.
I don't know why Randi uses tinyurl in his commentary...
Why? Because you just might get goatsed! (WARNING: Some text may be NSFW. Page links to, but does not display, NSFW image.)
Why? Because you just might get goatsed! (WARNING: Some text may be NSFW. Page links to, but does not display, NSFW image.)
This is something I have wondered about too. I can find absolutely no good reason for using a tiny URL link unless you are phishing and want people to not know the final destination. Isn't this why the anchor tag has an href attribute and the ability to apply it to any text? Wasn't this invented in like 1993.I really have no idea either. Tinyurl is great if you have to send a URL by carrier pigeon, but is pretty ugly for everything else. If have a nice HTML based format (like a web page), then you should use HTML links properly. If I want to link to Randi's commentary, then I will make a nice link to it.
Using tinyurl defeats part of the purpose of actually having a web page! I really don't understand the point of it.
This is something I have wondered about too. I can find absolutely no good reason for using a tiny URL link unless you are phishing and want people to not know the final destination. Isn't this why the anchor tag has an href attribute and the ability to apply it to any text? Wasn't this invented in like 1993.
I hate that when I hover over the links in the commentary, I never see the destination.
Has anybody brought the issue up with Randi, or is he ignorant of the issue? I understand that Randi is not as computer savvy as some of the rest of us, so if nobody has told him, he wouldn't neccesarily know that there was a problem.
wasn't there also an issue about not contributing to woo sites' pagerank, and other measures of that ilk?
and replaced the hotlinked file with one of those famous offensive ones (One with three old guys)
I wish I knew what famous picture you're talking about, no kidding. Or would that breach your membership agreement?
No. You don't. And yes, it would.I wish I knew what famous picture you're talking about, no kidding. Or would that breach your membership agreement?
I wish I knew what famous picture you're talking about, no kidding. Or would that breach your membership agreement?
Thanks for the info, geni. I guess, Arkan_Wolfshade was quite right and now I'll have to look at the Pet Pictures Thread to heal my eyes.![]()