Split Thread A full theory of 9/11

[bill smith]

What is the official vmo for a 767 at 800 feet as opposed to the 590 mph NIST says it was flying at ?

I should say Beachnut that RB may be lookigg in and waiting for your answer..

 

[beachnut]

...
From the faa.gov site for a 767-200
Airspeed Limits: VD = 420 KCAS to 17,854 ft/.91M above 23,000 ft, linear variation between these points.
VFC = 390 KCAS to 17,600 ft/382 KCAS at 23,000 ft/.87M above 26,000 ft, linear variation between these points.
VMO = 360 KCAS/.86M
VLE = 270 KCAS/.82M
VLO = 270 KCAS/.82M ...

bill smith quoted this and asks this...

I should say Beachnut that RB may be lookigg in and waiting for your answer..

You must of been posting while asleep.
Balsamo, and his moron math forum will not comprehend Vmo. Balsamo made up a Vg diagram to mislead people. Balsamo is like you, he has the delusion the plane can't fly past Vmo.

 

[The Platypus]

I had a 45 minute conversation two and a half years ago, OK?

And you expect people to be suspicious of the FBI and think there's some grand conspiracy, suspend all reality on go on wild goose chases because of that.

If that wasn't crazy enough, you come trolling a skeptics forum to do this. Yet you are somehow amazed that people are skeptical, , even when your adding things, changing things, claiming infallibility, etc...

Wow.

 

[Craig4]

I had a 45 minute conversation two and a half years ago, OK?

Yeah, compared to all the actual evidence about Atta and his movements just prior to boarding the plane that's nothing to trigger any action on the FBI's part.

 

[bill smith]

Bumped in self defence..

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7536717&postcount=776 hyperlink

 

[Oystein]

Just a reminder:

Oystein books could be written on the whole of 9/11.. Many have been in fact. My main purpose here is to elucidate the destruction of the buildings. How it was done and the media presentation aspect. Shankville and the Pentagon are covered. Full theory enough I think.
...

...and this destruction, according to the first couple or so pages of posts by Bill, was done by many tons of nanothermite in box columns that melted their steel, which was channeled to below the foundations of the basement.

There doesn't need to be a full theory Oystein, The real story will come out and then we will have most of the finer detail. I only desire to get this consistent working theory of mine into the public domain and was interested to observe reactions here on the jref.

In other words: Bill's only purpose here is to get this nanothermite-in-box-columns theory out.

 

[Sam.I.Am]

All of your whacked out theories aside Bill, calling the fiery deaths of hundreds of real people "Photogenic" is sick and indefensible no matter what the context.

I stand by my original statement.

 

[dafydd]

I haven't been following this,has any truther come up with a full theory? No? I thought so.

 

[MRC_Hans]

I'm still waiting for Bill to explain his 'thermite on columns thesis':

If you ignite it in the top, the molten steel can't run down (because of the thermite below).

If you ignite the bottom, what will hold up the building while the lower part of the columns melt?

Hans

 

[Animal]

Beachnut as a pilot of heavy jets are you seriously telling me that a 767 in a condition of gross overspeed in the much thicker air of only 800 feet will be able to use rudder and ailerons to make deliberate course corrections over a short distance ? 590 mph remember ?

Design limits does not equate to failure limits.