• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

A different take on telepathy

If and when I continue the other thread will be at my own discretion.

Before I continue, I'd like to state that everything posted by myself in this thread is copyrighted by myself and has been written before this thread.

Whether I have reason to prove anything will only come later.

You've got to be kidding. We are not here to feed your delusions of grandeur.

This sub-forum is for the MDC, not for blathering about wild theories.
 
Very true is the fact that this and the other thread are linked. However as witnessed from many threads, the discussion usually contained two main elements. One concerning the application and one concerning the what the application is about, as well as many sub-elements, of course.

True, ones behaviour can be judged from the fact they chose to discontinue there discussion for an extended period of time. However, it is also true that many consideration must be taken into account to make such a judge about behaviour. Behaviour can be haphazardly defined in a moment or from a combination of moments. The final judgement shouldn't be made until the end, if there is an end. And there was never an end to the other thread, not yet at least.
 
What I'll be conveying should neither be considered delusional or wild theories, although both are possibilities.

What I'd be suggesting will also not be included all in one post either. I'm interested in a discussion, not a one shot news piece, as per say.
 
As this is not about a specific application, it has been moved to the corect forum.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
Before I continue, I'd like to state that everything posted by myself in this thread is copyrighted by myself and has been written before this thread.

If telepathy were real, I doubt you'd be able to seriously enforce certain aspects of your copyright (see the "Dan Brown" court case dealing with "history" ;)).

I predict that nobody's going to want to violate your claim of copyright on this one... :rolleyes:
 
Wait wait...

I've got it!

You have the psychic power to click "post" before completing your thoughts, thus resulting in many posts in a row when one would suffice.
 
Great. Comments before I'd said a word. Just for your information. Your credibility can't be brought into question by the simple fact I didn't continue engaging with posters for a extended period. The absence was for a reason which I'm not going to bring to light here. This thread is for a different purpose.

You had your chance to do a controlled test.

You chose to not show up. Without notice.

Your behaviour in this regard displays a fine example of not acting in good faith, underlined by this:

If and when I continue the other thread will be at my own discretion.
 
Last edited:
Now onto telepathy. I've at one point called this by another name and for good reason (this was my reference to another post which I was writing when someone else beat me to the punch).

Seems like someone demonstrated both telepathy and precognition. Go Mojo!
 
Oh, I get it. Dargo's using his telepathy power to further this discussion. He's clearly not using the written word to communicate his thoughts.
 
Dargo, please put your entire remark in one post, instead of splitting it up across multiple posts. This is not a warning, only a request.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Paul C. Anagnostopoulos
 
I count 14 posts by Dargo in this thread thus far. And s/he has yet to make a point regarding what this thread is actually about. :dig:

Dargo, please. Get. To. The. Point.
:mad:
 
This reminds me of the Monty Python skit in which John Cleese has a new theory about dinosaurs...
 
This reminds me of the Monty Python skit in which John Cleese has a new theory about dinosaurs...

I've tried looking at this thread by bending over, looking through my legs and squinting and it still does not look like Stonehenge! :boggled:
 
I am one of the few interested in your theories but get on with it.
 
Before trying to explain something, first demonstrate there's something to explain. That the phenomenon exists.
 
Before trying to explain something, first demonstrate there's something to explain. That the phenomenon exists.

String theory exists but only as a theory. It may well be a load of garbage but there have been quite a few books published. So give this guy or anyone who wants to post on this forum a chance.
 
String theory exists but only as a theory. It may well be a load of garbage but there have been quite a few books published. So give this guy or anyone who wants to post on this forum a chance.

Did anyone ban him? If no, then he's every chance in the world. So far, he's used that chance for semi-coherent blathering but has failed to even clearly let us know what he was going on about. There's neither theory nor evidence so far.

Now, I don't even have a clue as to what string theory is, but I'd bet is has some links to the observable reality. I am certain it makes specific predictions or offers an explanation for real phenomenons. Someone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, though.
 

Back
Top Bottom