A Critical Analysis of JDX's math (split)

DavidJames said:
JDX hasn't acknowledged any of these comments yet. Does anyone still have the ability to post there, it would be nice to give him a nudge.
Click to expand...
I have an account there, but the thread in quesition is in the "Debates" forum, which they limit to only people who agree with them.

For some reason, there's not a lot of debating there. I guess that means everything they say is right!
 
There is 'Airdata Calibration And Measurement' in the pentagon forum but you can only post there without risk of deletion and ban/suspension if you agree with the thread, i think i read somewhere that you have to have 20 posts that agree with them before you can enter any debate which might explain the lack of any debating.
 
Last edited:
CurtC said:
I have an account there, but the thread in quesition is in the "Debates" forum, which they limit to only people who agree with them.

For some reason, there's not a lot of debating there. I guess that means everything they say is right!
Click to expand...
what I posted isn't in the debates forum, it's in the pentagon forum in a thread called Airdata Calibration And Measurement

edit: to late :)
 
alexi_drago said:
There is 'Airdata Calibration And Measurement' in the pentagon forum but you can only post there without risk of deletion and ban/suspension if you agree with the thread, i think i read somewhere that you have to have 20 posts that agree with them before you can enter any debate which might explain the lack of any debating.
Click to expand...
JDX reads these threads so I'm guessing he's seen the responses and is scrambling for a response. I'm not thinking of poking him with a stick, more like a nudge so others are aware that his data is being called into question.
 
alexi_drago said:
There is 'Airdata Calibration And Measurement' in the pentagon forum but you can only post there without risk of deletion and ban/suspension if you agree with the thread, i think i read somewhere that you have to have 20 posts that agree with them before you can enter any debate which might explain the lack of any debating.
Click to expand...
Welcome to the forums, Alexi.
Man, for a bunch of Libertarians, these guys sure have a lot of rules.
 
D'Oh! said:
Conclusion - The Flight Data Recorder used in the Bizarro World doesnt have any errors in terms of air data (altitude, airspeed). Those errors are removed during calibration testing for certification.
Click to expand...
Correction added.
 
DavidJames said:
JDX hasn't acknowledged any of these comments yet. Does anyone still have the ability to post there, it would be nice to give him a nudge.
Click to expand...

From what I hear, Oliver has a nice sock drawer :D
 
TSO-C124, apart from the FAR, says that it must comply with EUROCAE standard ED-55.

I'm seeing if our flight test unit has a copy of it, rather than me paying for a copy (US$108!). I start getting replies back after the weekend.
 
Bumping for the recently returned weedwacker on the "other" thread, now that he has come by to assure us that the D'oh Boy is his long lost flying comrade.
 
weedwacker said:
The 5 frames video that shows it level just above the lawn. I firmly believe the 757 hit the pentagon. We have people from FLYI that say they saw it on the way in to work from DC. But this FDR is very interesting. Did this really come from the NTSB?
Click to expand...

I think the video frames were made at 1 second intervals

the video would not show much of anything

flight 77 was going 771 feet per second or greater

the video missed it, sort of, hard to get info from such a slow camera rate
 
Wait! What did you just quote there? JDX comfirming the 757 did hit the Pentagon? :eek:
 
weedwacker said:
G Force is a Force. F = ma.

Basically, by your claims, a 757 would take the same amount of G's to pull out of a 4,000 fpm dive in one second as a Learjet. I highly disagree.


Besides the fact that the csv file never shows 3 g's for one full second, anywhere.

But, I do admire your work and thanks for the input. What kind of student are you? Physics?
Click to expand...

a two g turn in a 172, in a learjet, in a 757, or a 767, would be 60 degrees level, would it not

the energy involved, the turn radius, etc, would be different but the g rate would be the same if you do a 60 degree level banked turn in normal aircraft.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom