A comparison of Jesus and Muhammad

[Akhenaten]

Were they paper sacks?

No, plastic ones.

They were polythenists.

 

[Akhenaten]

That is a nice neat unsourced statement but there is much much more to this.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11752a.htm

The Catholic Encyclopedia???

Why didn't you quote your old standby - Wikipedia? What does it say about the matter? Does it name any sources that disagree with your apologist propoganda?

I'll put the link here so we can all have a quick read of the pertinent points while we wait for the proper scholars to turn up and demolish your silly, unexplained link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Petrine_epistles​

 

[Mojo]

That is a nice neat unsourced statement but there is much much more to this.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11752a.htm

Here's one of your pieces of "evidence" for the truth of Christianity:

Christianity spread from 12 men in a remote corner of the Roman empire without the internet (or even paper).

Was the spread of Christianity remarkable because of the lack of means of long-distance communication, or unremarkable because Peter and the others were able to write letters?

 

[Craig4]

If anyone is not able to get the above link to come up (like me today), you can google "It is quite certain Peter spent his last years in Rome" to get it.

That's certainly an unbiased source you have there, the Catholic Encyclopedia. None of that does anything to support the idea that Jesus was anything other than a cult leader who got sideways with the Romans and got turned into a public art project. He was either too crazy or too stupid to un**** himself. He wouldn't be the first religious nutcase that caused the Romans to get out the 2x4's, nails and post hole digger.

 

[carlitos]

Was the spread of Christianity remarkable because of the lack of means of long-distance communication, or unremarkable because Peter and the others were able to write letters?

Yes, obviously.