Yes you have, many times. I've just pointed them out to you.
I understand it full well. It is beyond the reach of that which is reachable, and beyond that, and beyond that, and beyond that ...
Nope. I see you still don't understand. You are still speaking of it as if it it were a thing.
Oh really? Then why try to explain that it all began with the Big Bang?
No honest person claims to know "why" or even if there is a "why". You don't know, but you claim to. That is one reason you are not in that catagory.
Bully! I also understand that he claims to be a
Pantheist.
Which is to say that he doesn't believe in a personal god or an intervening god or possibly even a conscious god. You might want to be careful who you get into bed with.
Well, you know what they say? ... Never say never.
True. You might make a complete reversal of your previous philosophy and decide to back up your claims with evidence. I'm not holding my breath.
Let's see, Zero can be used as point of reference or, departure, while infinity becomes the continuum, extending out past your point of departure. You know, like 0 + 1 = 1, 1 + 1 = 2, 2 + 1 = 3, so on and so forth ... on out to, "infinity."
LOL. What happens when you add zero to one? What if you add zero to one a hundred times? A million? Nothing happens. You still have one. So you are not doing math. You are doing nothing.
What happens if you multiply by zero? lets say zero times 2. If you multiply one by two, you take get a single two. If you multiply four times two, you get eight twos. But if you multiply nothing by two, you have done nothing. You have not even done any math. If you take a large complex equation and multiply it by zero, you are saying essentially, "take this large equation and do nothing with it".
Zero is not a number, Iacchus. Here's a test. Try taking the reciprocal. You can do that with any real number.
And when you say "out to infinity", you are speaking of it as if it were a number. You can't count to infinity, Iacchus.
Yes, either that or, this is what you believed along. Could it be that you don't wish to look like the baffoon?
It's the same thing, Iacchus. Saying it doesn't expand into anything is exactly the same as saying it expands into nothing. It's just confusing to little minds like yours, so I am simply saying Belz phrased it better than I. But I'm not worried about looking like a baffoon. I'm not sure what a baffoon is.
Yes, you should choose your arguments more carefully.
I admit I'm not the world's best teacher. As my exchanges with you illustrate, I would have great difficulty being patient with the slow students. Though in defense of most of them, they don't usually argue that they know something when they don't. Only a few
very slow people are so slow that they don't even know they are slow.
