9/11 WTC Photos by private pilot published

[beachnut]

Did you notice what looks like United 175 in the fourth photo? (Little dark spot in the upper right corner)

Or, as Jerry Leaphart, I mean jammonius, would call it, a blob.

Don't tell Jerry, this pilot saw the aircraft. Another eye witness jammonius has to ignore.

 

[tsig]

As opposed to his first?

He couldn't hit the building on his first ten attempts.

 

[alexi_drago]

According to his opinion it was some very experienced millitary pilot making his last kamikaze mission.

He was expeienced in kamikaze missions having done many before. He couldn't have been particularly good.

 

[Edx]

See no planers would say this guy is a double liar. ;D

 

[MaGZ]

In the fifth photo taken by the Russian you see one of the Otis fighters above WTC 1. Remember this was one of the fighters that fired a missile at the second plane missing it and hitting WTC 7.

 

[Sabretooth]

In the fifth photo taken by the Russian you see one of the Otis fighters above WTC 1. Remember this was one of the fighters that fired a missile at the second plane missing it and hitting WTC 7.

I see that! This pic must have been taken right after he straffed that bus load of kids heading to the Statue of Liberty!

 

[jaydeehess]

In the fifth photo taken by the Russian you see one of the Otis fighters above WTC 1. Remember this was one of the fighters that fired a missile at the second plane missing it and hitting WTC 7.

You mean that tiny horizontal bit in the picture?

Pray tell, how do you manage to see that it is a fighter and not some other aircraft?

 

[beachnut]

In the fifth photo taken by the Russian you see one of the Otis fighters above WTC 1. Remember this was one of the fighters that fired a missile at the second plane missing it and hitting WTC 7.

RADAR has no fighter there. You should use real evidence instead of delusions when you make statements.

 

[MRC_Hans]

In the fifth photo taken by the Russian you see one of the Otis fighters above WTC 1.

No, I don't see it. There is a small fleck, but it could be anything, including a bird.

Remember this was one of the fighters that fired a missile at the second plane missing it and hitting WTC 7.

No, I don't remember that.

Please provide all of the following:

- Any evidence of a fast-moving, noisy fighter in full view of thousands of onlookers and dozens of cameras.

- Any evidence of the very conspicuous smoke trail of a missile, in full view of thousands of onlookers and dozens of cameras.

- Any evidence of the rather huge explosion of a missile warhead, in full view of thousands of onlookers and dozens of cameras.

Hans

 

[jaydeehess]

- Any evidence of a fast-moving, noisy fighter in full view of thousands of onlookers and dozens of cameras.

pah! Wonder Woman was at the controls and her plane is invisible!

- Any evidence of the rather huge explosion of a missile warhead, in full view of thousands of onlookers and dozens of cameras.

Hans

Once again you are in error. An air-to-air missile needs not produce a large explosion since it does not take too much to rip holes in another fighter. On the other hand these same missiles, when they hit large buildings cause all manner of damage, they compromise the strutural integrity of the building and cause dozens of vehicles at street level to spontaneously ignite.

 

[Bell]

In the fifth photo taken by the Russian you see one of the Otis fighters above WTC 1. Remember this was one of the fighters that fired a missile at the second plane missing it and hitting WTC 7.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Hey, you saw Running Man right? they can do anything with video editing.

 

[George 152]

Well, me too. But the idea that the equivalent of a pass down a really wide runway is harder to do than an actual landing strikes me as a bit bizarre.

Some people have an idea that the physical skills required to fly an airplane are terribly demanding. They aren't.

For truthers anything physical and requiring co-ordination is somewhere between difficult and impossible.
driving a car on a narrow road and landing an aircraft on a runway are not disimular.

 

[George 152]

In the fifth photo taken by the Russian you see one of the Otis fighters above WTC 1. Remember this was one of the fighters that fired a missile at the second plane missing it and hitting WTC 7.

Where did all these fighters come from (How long would it take to fly from Otis to NY)and how were they fully armed ?

How is it that every-one watching the WTC saw the B767s strike the towers but no-one saw (or heard or videod) jet fighters..

And why have none of the ground or flight crews come forward to say that they launched fighters or flew the fighters ?

 

[MRC_Hans]

And how is it that the ATC does not have any registration of fighters in their busy airspace?

Even a MAGZ should be able to figure out the reason fighters don't just fly into one of the world's most busy airspaces without strict coordination whith ATC.

Hans

 

[Oystein]

In the fifth photo taken by the Russian you see one of the Otis fighters above WTC 1. Remember this was one of the fighters that fired a missile at the second plane missing it and hitting WTC 7.

And off to ignore you go, Troll.