9/11 Wiki Project

[israelside]

The CIA? The CIA is an intelligence agency. They don't "negotiate" with anyone. Prior to 9/11 the Taliban were recognised by the United Nations as a major threat to global peace and security. Osama bin Laden was small fry.

http://www.cia-on-campus.org/social/price.html CIA negotiated there
how about those secret prisons, negotiations with prisoners to release info? waterboarding? at gitmo? o wait, that's just torture lol...or is it?

http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1998/10/981029-cia.htm mideast peace negotiations...shall i continue?

bin laden small fry? leader of the worlds largest know terrorist organization supposidly? everyone blamed him for 911 straight off the bat, unknown? small fry? or even...incapable of such attacks? So if he was how did he get so orchestrated on 9/11 with no help from a state sponsor? Prior to 911 many mid eastern nations recognized the Taliban even tho they held terrorists, they seemed more like a opium hungry batch of crazed fools who beat women and kids and whoever if they didnt follow their rules of islamic law...not exactly a global threat to civilization (ie a nuclear threat). I think russia, iraq, north korea, cuba would be more of a threat than the taliban.

Al Qaeda carried out the 9/11 attacks. Not the Taliban, not the ISI, and not Afghani Mujahideen. Al Qaeda was not involved in drug smuggling from Afghanistan (which, by the way, is opium, not cocaine - cocaine comes from South America - 75% of it from Columbia).

Numerous articles in the 911 timeline report of ISI / Al Queda drug smuggling, opium account for 70% of the world's opium, Al Queda's main goal had to be guarding those fields! You are just lying now dude!

Al Qaeda got its funding from private sources, not governments. Radical Islam has a long history of sophisticated funding sources.

Get me those funding sources that Al Queda had...or still has, I am interested!

I'm not your buddy. There is no need for all of the members to see highly sensitive documents. It would be an unsafe breach of national security.

Granted, not everyone should see classified documents, just MORE than just 2 should have seen this documents, what on earth do they have to hide? Does 1 say, secret society rules hidden govt faction...or Al Queda member actually is an alien from iraq who lived in the ancient sumarian tribe before foundations of civilization? lol, if 1 of the guys saw a article that would hurt his case big time...just leave it out right? Accountablity is what america is about, that's why we got 3 branches of govt!! You're not even an American lol...

I'm very familiar with his story. The above statements indicate you are not.

I have removed personal attacks.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero

Conspiracy theorists think the government did it. By definition, therefore, anyone "in office" is in on it, and not independent.

no, most govt workers are just that...workers, the elite do the planning, some are black ops...or false flags, do you even know what those are? lol

The FBI's criminal investigation involved over half of the organisation's special agents and is the largest criminal investigation in US history. The combined investigations into 9/11 constitute the largest investigation into a single event in human history.

i was talking about the commission! it was underfunded, yet their story is considered biblical...everything else is just....another investigation! but i'm glad for them!

This is illogical. We can't trust the few people who have access to secret documents so we should let more people have access to them? These documents are secret for a reason.

You are illogical, i have spent time here refuting nearly everyone of your points! It's illogical to allow only a few people to have access to secret info...power in the hands of a few is dangerous, ask the jews. We can't trust humans by nature, only those who are good deserve to know the secrets...right? And who is good, christians....see you are not a christian so everything I am saying to you you don't understand!




and WKJO, is based off real issues and the director talks on the radio as if his points are to be serious...not just fictional made up for a movie....he believe in them, just like the end of the movie says..."the director believes everything in this film is true" or to that degree




-Gumboot[/quote]

 

[gumboot]

israelside,

This discussion is off topic and I'm not going to continue it in this thread.

If you'd like to discuss a particular aspect of 9/11 I encourage you to create a new thread, and I will gladly join you.

Regards,
-Gumboot

 

[israelside]

ok gumboot respond at this thread "All 9/11 ideas welcomed here"

 

[israelside]

Well I'm glad to see the over abundance of replies since I have gone to post on other threads...you got rid of my distraction from the wiki project, WOW how many posts since I left? 0? lol, man gotta watch those conspiracy theorists, they draw a crowd, people love to debate with them...that might draw attention to the thread..noooooooo. Bottom line is, no one was talking in this thread before, after I posted people came and replied, I left no one shows up....yet, I am the bad guy for posting out of subject, what a joke. I should still post on the subject, but what it tells you is, people on here and in life just love to debate and fight, NO MATTER WHAT THE ISSUE!! They don't even care if they win, if they fight you, they are fulfilled somehow...sad

 

[Slayhamlet]

Well I'm glad to see the over abundance of replies since I have gone to post on other threads...you got rid of my distraction from the wiki project, WOW how many posts since I left? 0? lol, man gotta watch those conspiracy theorists, they draw a crowd, people love to debate with them...that might draw attention to the thread..noooooooo. Bottom line is, no one was talking in this thread before, after I posted people came and replied, I left no one shows up....yet, I am the bad guy for posting out of subject, what a joke. I should still post on the subject, but what it tells you is, people on here and in life just love to debate and fight, NO MATTER WHAT THE ISSUE!! They don't even care if they win, if they fight you, they are fulfilled somehow...sad

Talking to yourself? Trying to justify your existence?

 

[Totovader]

Well I'm glad to see the over abundance of replies since I have gone to post on other threads...you got rid of my distraction from the wiki project, WOW how many posts since I left? 0? lol, man gotta watch those conspiracy theorists, they draw a crowd, people love to debate with them...that might draw attention to the thread..noooooooo. Bottom line is, no one was talking in this thread before, after I posted people came and replied, I left no one shows up....yet, I am the bad guy for posting out of subject, what a joke. I should still post on the subject, but what it tells you is, people on here and in life just love to debate and fight, NO MATTER WHAT THE ISSUE!! They don't even care if they win, if they fight you, they are fulfilled somehow...sad

Since you were too busy trying to hijack the thread- I guess you didn't notice that the discussion was moved to a new thread, because of you.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=81144

If it's too difficult for you to understand why discussions should stay relevant to the original topics, then maybe you just don't get online discussion boards?

The fact that you were asked to stay on topic, create a new thread, and stop filling this one up with garbage should show you that it does matter, despite what you're trying to say... because what you're trying to say makes no sense.

If you want to go pout, though, you can take up any issues you have with the mods. I wouldn't recommend posting off-topic stuff in any more threads, including this one.

 

[Slayhamlet]

Since you were too busy trying to hijack the thread- I guess you didn't notice that the discussion was moved to a new thread, because of you.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=81144

If it's too difficult for you to understand why discussions should stay relevant to the original topics, then maybe you just don't get online discussion boards?

The fact that you were asked to stay on topic, create a new thread, and stop filling this one up with garbage should show you that it does matter, despite what you're trying to say... because what you're trying to say makes no sense.

If you want to go pout, though, you can take up any issues you have with the mods. I wouldn't recommend posting off-topic stuff in any more threads, including this one.

I think you just bruised his ego. But then again, the ego of an egomaniac is impossible to harm, so maybe you didn't.

 

[israelside]

I think you just bruised his ego. But then again, the ego of an egomaniac is impossible to harm, so maybe you didn't.

why would a new thread need to be created just because someone talks off topic? doesn't that give more power to abusers than legit people? Again, my comments did not all deal with the wiki project, and I am wrong for not staying on topic, I said that...however, other people did respond to me so i responded back, so see the whole picture in your wacked up mind toto!

 

[CptColumbo]

why would a new thread need to be created just because someone talks off topic? doesn't that give more power to abusers than legit people? Again, my comments did not all deal with the wiki project, and I am wrong for not staying on topic, I said that...however, other people did respond to me so i responded back, so see the whole picture in your wacked up mind toto!

or you could create a new thread to continue the off-topic discussion and leave a link to it. http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=81820

But still stop the personal attacks and remain civil.
Step away from the computer if you have to cool down and do something else for awhile, both of you.

 

[Totovader]

why would a new thread need to be created just because someone talks off topic? doesn't that give more power to abusers than legit people? Again, my comments did not all deal with the wiki project, and I am wrong for not staying on topic, I said that...however, other people did respond to me so i responded back, so see the whole picture in your wacked up mind toto!

The "whole picture" is that you're a troll.

 

[chippy]

why would a new thread need to be created just because someone talks off topic? doesn't that give more power to abusers than legit people? Again, my comments did not all deal with the wiki project, and I am wrong for not staying on topic, I said that...however, other people did respond to me so i responded back, so see the whole picture in your wacked up mind toto!

By that logic, I could go to a completely unrelated thread and call you any number of personal insults, and then when you responded to it I'd say "hey, you're off-topic too!" My point is that people have a right to respond to things that are said, no matter where they said. Being the one who leads a discussion in the completely wrong direction, however, is pretty stupid.

Now anyway...has any progress been made in developing an actual 9/11 Wiki? I would be more than happy to contribute my evidence and what not to this project.

 

[Totovader]

<snip>

Now anyway...has any progress been made in developing an actual 9/11 Wiki? I would be more than happy to contribute my evidence and what not to this project.

I think the general consensus has been to update the skepticwiki. Not only does it have the Google exposure already, but it is backed up, monitored and maintained.

I've been putting a couple things together to put up- but I haven't made any major contributions, yet.

 

[chippy]

What's the link to that?

 

[Totovader]

What's the link to that?

http://skepticwiki.org/index.php/Main_Page

PM fowlsound (or email through the main page) for an account