• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11 Truthcraft: Teaching 9/11 Truth to Kids

You should try Blender 3D with the destruction plug in.
Here's some of my old Blender collapses:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGWoCcQJSNQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GayiIRsLdsM

Here, someone already did a WTC:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_J7ak_IZXk

Much better than Minecraft.

That Blender video you referenced is ok, but it did not capture all the features of the destruction of the Twin Towers.

Also, I will not be destroying anything. I'm using Minecraft as a 3D map of Ground Zero and looking at documentary and other evidence.
 
You see, there's your problem right there. Dusty flits from whacky notion to whacky notion, abandoning them when they foamify beneath her. This will happen here too.

Fitz

The best researchers use whatever resources they can muster to do the job.
 
No, the best researchers use the RIGHT tools for the job.

ETA: The desperate researchers, however...

The best researchers know which tools are appropriate, useful, and available for the job. I really doubt you've had to deal with this very much, unless you, too, are a research scientist.

Have you ever had to invent an experimental test from scratch, gather the materials, conduct the test, and evaluate the results? It's a serious question. If you have, I'd like to hear about it. If you haven't, then you really don't have a place telling me how to do science.
 
No. The best researchers get the best resources they can. You seem quite happy to use 'tools' that are abysmally inadequate.

Inadequate for what?

Magnets don't have to be expensive to attract iron fragments.
pH paper isn't expensive.
Microscopes are a bit expensive, and yes, I have a basic microscope.
Minecraft costs $20 and you can build a 3D model of Ground Zero with it, if you want!
All the tools I've used have been adequate in my opinion, so I'm really curious as to what you might mean by "inadequate".
 
The best researchers know which tools are appropriate, useful, and available for the job. I really doubt you've had to deal with this very much, unless you, too, are a research scientist.

Have you ever had to invent an experimental test from scratch, gather the materials, conduct the test, and evaluate the results? It's a serious question. If you have, I'd like to hear about it. If you haven't, then you really don't have a place telling me how to do science.

Pulling the condescension card, eh?

I don't give a hoot what your degree is. My job is all about finding and using the right tools.

Do you even realize you just changed what you were asserting? You just added the word 'appropriate', which you did not use before my comment. Why not just then admit it? Is this some sort of ego contest? Is it all about you, or is it about a problem you are trying to solve?
 
Pulling the condescension card, eh?

I don't give a hoot what your degree is. My job is all about finding and using the right tools.

Do you even realize you just changed what you were asserting? You just added the word 'appropriate', which you did not use before my comment. Why not just then admit it? Is this some sort of ego contest? Is it all about you, or is it about a problem you are trying to solve?

Do I know how to call them or what???? Its all about Tracy.
 
Minecraft can't even be used as a model, some people have made tributes with it, however they aren't meant to be accurate. The reason people laugh when you say you are using a video game, where you can "fly around", to portray anything in regards to 9/11 is because it's ludicrous. It's a game, there is no physics model, there is no accuracy, you're model is useless. Yeah, it looks pretty neat, the yellow roads are weird, and I'm glad you've found something to invest so much time in. Long story short, your little game WTC is just that, a little game WTC. It has no useful application in the real world, entertaining this theory is completely ridiculous.
 
I've moved a whole bunch of posts to Abandon All Hope. Please, do not make this into another 'no plane' thread or another 'dustifoamication' thread. Also, be civil and polite, and address the argument rather than attacking the arguer. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
That Blender video you referenced is ok, but it did not capture all the features of the destruction of the Twin Towers.

Also, I will not be destroying anything. I'm using Minecraft as a 3D map of Ground Zero and looking at documentary and other evidence.

Blender is a 3D modeling program. It's much better (although much harder to use) than minecraft. Blender is 100% free as well (open source). If you're just building a model, Blender would still work better and look a lot less laughable. :D
 

Back
Top Bottom