9/11 Multiple Choice for CTists and Truthers

Topic #4 - WTC Attacks
-------------------------

Q7. of the following scientists, which do you feel is most qualified to investigate and postulate on the collapse of the WTCs?

(A) Steven Jones - Former BYU Physicist
(B) Judy Wood - Mechanical Engineer
(C) Jim Hoffman - Software Engineer
(D) Charles Pegalow - Civil Engineer
(E) H.S. Lew - Civil Engineer
(F) Other (please explain)

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Topic #8 - Who is Responsible
------------------------------

Q1. If 9/11 was an "inside job", which of the following do you feel are part of the cover up (you may choose more than 1)?

(A) Members of the BUSH Administration
(B) Members of the CLINTON Administration
(C) Members of the CIA
(D) Members of the FBI
(E) Members of FEMA
(F) Members of NIST
(G) Members of NTSB
(H) Members of FAA
(I) Members of NORAD
(J) Members of NEADS
(K) Larry Silverstein
(L) Members of the FDNY
(M) Rudolph Guilianni
(N) Wealthy Jewish Businessmen/Bankers
(O) Others (Please specify).

TAM:)
Click to expand...
what happened to the "all of the above" option?
 
This is really good so far. It nicely encapsulates the various issues surrounding the events of 9/11, represents most of the major theories involved, and provides room for Truthers to provide their own answers.
 
Silver:

They could pick "Other" and there explain they choose them all, or simply circule all of them...lol

Jonny:

Ya, I would like others to contribute to these questions, trying to use the same Topic X Question Y format. All togethe a nice complilation might allow us some inside as to the motives and the "where they are coming from" aspects of the truthers who come here...if we can get them to answer the quiz.

If nothing more, it will make for a good pile of questions we can cut and paste from, to get some answers from the truthers.

TAM
 
T.A.M. This is really good stuff. You even got the obligatory "Who, me?" posting from Driveby Empress! (I see a new badge.... "I was momentarily distracted into replying to a CLE comment 'cuz her avatar's so hot.")

Can I suggest you keep this on a dot doc, and then take it to a "create a poll" site. You could link the poll for newbie troofers. And everyone could just refuse to address them until they registered at the Custom Title Thread.

Scoring system:

Score 1 for each A, 2 for B, 3 for C, etc.....
Take the average and you are required to request a custom title according to the Twoofer-Tape measuring system.
Average 1 to 1.7 - Not a Twoofer
1.8 to 2.5 - Borderline LIHOP Twoofer
2.5 to 3.4 - Twoofer With You Tube Links
3.5 to 4.4 - Twoofer With Library Card and You Tube Links
4.4 to 5.0 - You believe anything! Alex Jones' and Jason Bermas' Love Child
Click to expand...

And... to Driveby Empress.

The act is wearing thin, frankly. Think about it.

The underlying purpose of such a poll/thread is designed just for folks like you. Golly, why would one want to know the actual stand of the person who's purporting to debate one??? Surely you jest!

You define this thread! In your world you're the most interesting person, naturally, but some of us like our information up front. As you will notice, a lot of the CT threads are dominated by people asking the twoofers to state their position. This isn't just for CT, it's for any discourse, IMHO. If I'm arguing (say)Hamilton/Burr and state my opinions up front that Burr was the "better man", I'd like to know whether the affirmative or negative poster actually believes something, and what that something is. Otherwise, it's just trolling, no matter how cute your avatar is.
 
The interesting thing is that if you program this as an interactive poll, you can have the questions be..."self-correcting". If someone answers a question with an answer that can be easily proven wrong, the poll could pop up a quick blurb saying "Before continuing, you should know that...." and then asking "would you like to change your answer?".
 
T.A.M. said:
I am hoping this thread, through its proper use, will allow me to get a handle on where the CTers/truthers who post here stand on certain issues/elements of the attacks.

They are multiple choice questions, requiring only a one letter response, unless one chooses the last option in each question (the "other" option) in which case a brief synopsis of why the option was chosen would be appreciated.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Fantastic idea, T.A.M.

This thread will be quite useful. A great way to know where each truther stands on each issue instead of having a truther start their own thread and them desperately trying and prove one claim or a few.

This thread needs a sticky so that it doesn't need to be continually 'bumped.'
 
I am game for either (an interactive poll or a stickie) but know how to do neither. Jonnyfive has created a PDF of most of the questions so far with an answer sheet at the end. This may be an equally good option.

I also was hoping to get input from others in terms of additional questions we might ask them, in order to make the quiz complete.

TAM:)
 
I'm sure a moderator could help add a 'Sticky' to this thread.

So far, I think you have covered it well with the many questions you've posted in this thread.
 
Topic #9 - Actions and Solutions
--------------------------------

Q1. If a "New Independent Investigation" into the events of 9/11 were to occur or be granted, of the following choices, whom would you most like to see as part of such an investigation? (choose more than one, order them in order of most desirable)

(A) The USG
(B) FBI
(C) CIA
(D) NIST
(E) FEMA
(F) ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers)
(G) Thomas Kean
(H) Lee Hamilton
(I) The Jersey Girls
(J) Relatives of the Passengers of AA11, UA175, UA93, AA77
(K) Steven Jones PhD
(L) James Fetzer PhD
(M) Paul Thompson (9/11 Timeline)
(N) Barack Obama
(O) Hillary Clinton
(P) Richard Clarke
(Q) Other (please specify)

*Question courtesy of JREF user "SLOB"

TAM:)
 
I like these questions. I have been a CT once. Answering these questions would have showed me, how the theories that I had contradict to each other and how unlikely Government Involvement is
 
Last edited:
I am surprised by that. I find most CTers are too held to their misbeliefs to have mere questions sway them.

If they have that effect, great, but that was not really their purpose. The purpose of the questions is to get an idea of what beliefs an individual CTer has...where do they stand on the various issues...how "Hardcore" are they. It will enable me and others, hopefully, to better focus our conversations/discussion/debate with them.

TAM
 
Though I tended to believe in government involvement, I always had in mind, that I could be wrong about it. Of course the minority of the CTs think like that. An interactive questionnaire would be great, in which you mark your believes and it then shows a conclusion like "Your Version requires an estimated amount of xxxx people to either be part of the conspiracy, or to cover it up. Do you REALLY think this is plausible?" and "Your answer to question X contradicts with your answer to question Y" ;) But as we all know, a real Truther woul accept this right away, so this would be useless. It's sad.

As a CT I never really realized, how many people would have direct or indirect knowledge about the conspiracy. I always thought about a small two-digit number. Now I know that this is just too farout and that I was very naive.
 
I agree, that the "keeping silent" factor is one of the areas that usually wakes one up. The CTs counter with the A-Bomb testing, where only a few knew, but they grossly over state the case, and it occured in a different time, a different era, where keeping the underlings silent was much easier...IMO.

TAM
 
T.A.M. said:
Topic #1 - The Hijackers/Al-Qaeda
------------------------------------

Q1. Which of the following options best describes your thoughts on the role of the 19 alleged hijackers involved in the 9/11 attacks?

(A) They were terrorists, members of Al-Qaeda, and carried out the attacks of 9/11.
(B) They were Jihadists, but patsies, set up by elements of the USG to be the scapegoats for the 9/11 attacks.
(C) They were operatives working for the CIA.
(D) They fictional people, that did not exist, whose histories were made up by elements of the USG in order to explain/account for the attacks.
(E) Other (please explain).


TAM:)
Click to expand...

A. Absolutly.
 
T.A.M. said:
Topic #1 - The Hijackers/Al-Qaeda
------------------------------------

Q2. With regards to OBL (Osama Bin Laden), which best describes your view on his role in 9/11 and in Al-Qaeda in general?

(A) OBL was/is the leader of Al-Qaeda, and was, as its leader, responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
(B) OBL was/is the leader of Al-Qaeda, but was not involved in the attacks.
(C) OBL was/is a CIA operative or informant, who has helped co-ordinate attacks under the name of "Al-Qaeda", while secretly doing so for the USG.
(D) OBL is a fictional character created by the USG to explain the terrorist attacks, and on film and audio is played by a hired actor/shill.
(E) Other (Please explain).

TAM:)
Click to expand...

A. (and yes, I'm a supermoderator and conspiracy theorist on ATS. Yes, really.)
 
T.A.M. said:
Topic #1 - The Hijackers/Al-Qaeda
------------------------------------

Q3. KSM's (Khalid Sheikh Mohammed) role in 9/11 is best described by which of the following statements?

(A) KSM was a member of the terrorist organization "Al-Qaeda", and was the mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks.
(B) KSM was a member of Al-Qaeda, but his role in 9/11 was that of a patsie.
(B) KSM is an innocent man of arab origins, whom was captured by the USA, and then torchered into false confessions about his roll in 9/11.
(D) KSM is a CIA operative or informant who helped facilitate the stories and/or circumstances of the role of "Al-Qaeda" in the 9/11 attacks, so as to provide a cover story for the real perpetrators, the USG.
(E) Other (Please explain).

TAM:)
Click to expand...

E) Member of Al-Qaeda and ONE of the ones masterminding the attack. I don't think it was solely the work of one man, but rather a collaborative effort.
 
T.A.M. said:
Topic #1 - The Hijackers/Al-Qaeda
------------------------------------

Q4. The role of Ramzi Binalshibh in the attacks of 9/11, is best described by which of the following statements?

(A) He was a terrorist, a member of Al-Qaeda, and was responsible for co-ordinating elements of the attacks of 9/11 from his location in europe.
(B) He was a member of Al-Qaeda, but had no role in the 9/11 attacks.
(C) He was an innocent man of arab origins who was framed by the USG for a role in the 9/11 attacks.
(D) He was a CIA Operative or Informant who helped create/fabricate the eivdence linking Al-qaeda and the arab hijackers to the attacks, as a front to protect the real perpetrators, the USG.
(E) Other (please explain).

TAM:)
Click to expand...

E) He was a terrorist and one of the ones tapped to participate in the attacks. I also think he's a real nutcase; ineffective.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom