9/11 Multiple Choice for CTists and Truthers

Childlike Empress said:
Well, somehow i feeled adressed. Anyway, no badges - no answers. ;)
Click to expand...

Oh now that is a shame, I was kind of hoping from your answers I could get a better grasp on where you stand...you are quite elusive with your opinions on the 9/11 CTs...but that is part of your mystery CLE.;)

TAM:)
 
Topic #4 - WTC attacks
------------------------

Q6. There are many pieces of so called "evidence" that point toward Controlled Demolition of WTC 1&2. Of those listed below, which do you feel is the strongest in terms of proving the collapse of the WTCs occured via CD?

(A) Sulfur Residue on metal samples from the WTC.
(B) The buildings collapsed in NEAR "Free Fall" time.
(C) The temperatures of the fires were not hot enough to melt steel.
(D) The "Bathtub" of the WTC did not flood, along with half of manhattan.
(E) The buildings fell straight down rather than toppling over.
(F) Other (Please explain).

TAM:)
 
Topic #5 - WTC7
------------------

Q1. Of the factors listed below, which NIST has stated are the most likely factors contributing to the collapse of WTC7, which do you believe are false?

(A) An initial local failure occured on the lower floors (below floor 13) as a result of fire and/or debris induced damage.
(B) The initial failure progressed vertically up to the east penthouse.
(C) The large floor bays of the building were unable to redistribute the added load caused by the vertical progression of the initial failure.
(D) Damage via the vertical progression resulted in a horizontal progression along the lower floors (Floors 5 to 7) resulting in a disproportionate collapse of the entire structure.
(E) Other (please explain).

TAM:)
 
I would answer A to just about all of them as I'm sure most who come here would. Did I pass?
 
Topic #5 - WTC7
------------------

Q1. There has been discussion of how much physical, non-fire damage WTC7 actually incurred. With regards to this, which of the following statements best describes your opinion on the non-fire damage to WTC7?

(A) There is no evidence that there was any non-fire damage done to WTC7.
(B) There is only evidence of minor damage to WTC7, that done to the SW corner of the building only.
(C) There is good evidence that there was major non-fire damage done to WTC7 including a 10 or more storey hole dug out of the south side of the building as a result of falling debris from the falling of the 2nd WTC.
(D) Other (please explain).

TAM:)
 
Bubbers:

there is no pass or fail. Your answer to T5Q1, if answered honestly, tells me you are likely not a CTist...but I need more info from the rest of the questions. Yes, in general (there are exceptions) the A answer tends to be the non-CT answer...

TAM:)
 
The MCAT was enormous with, if memory serves me (I wrote it in 1993), it was well over 600 questions involving the biological science, the physical sciences, english language& literature/reasoning, and then an essay that had to be written.

It took the entire day from 8AM to 4PM to finish (including breaks).

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Bubbers:

there is no pass or fail. Your answer to T5Q1, if answered honestly, tells me you are likely not a CTist...but I need more info from the rest of the questions. Yes, in general (there are exceptions) the A answer tends to be the non-CT answer...

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Thanks. I was just joking about the passing thing. Good stuff though. I'm wondering where 28thK is. I can just see his answers now...

d,d,d,d,d,d,d,d,d,d,d,d,d,d....
 
Topic #6 - The Pentagon
-------------------------

Q1. What do you think is the strongest piece of evidence that goes against the official story?

(A) Some photos that do not show much plane wreckage.
(B) The alleged poor flying skills of alleged hijacker pilot Hani Hanjour.
(C) The fact that the Titanium Engines were not found intact.
(D) That part of a light pole could pass through the front window of a cab nearby, but not damage the outer hood of the cab.
(E) That there are no sharp videos showing the plane, traveling at 500mph, hitting the Pentagon, but there are lots of videos of the planes hitting the WTCs.
(F) You have examined the FDR data from the black box of AA77 and have determined conclusively that the plane flew too high to hit the light poles.
(G) Other (please explain).

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
The MCAT was enormous with, if memory serves me (I wrote it in 1993), it was well over 600 questions involving the biological science, the physical sciences, english language& literature/reasoning, and then an essay that had to be written.

It took the entire day from 8AM to 4PM to finish (including breaks).

TAM:)
Click to expand...
I learned that being a doctor doesn't make your dreams come true, at least for me :)
 
T.A.M., good work.

I had an idea for an internet quiz that would involve a lot of similar questions, and would give you an assessment of your stance and recommendations for further reading (& medication :) (?)).

I wonder if we have any programming experts who could rig up something like that.
 
The Silver Shadow said:
I learned that being a doctor doesn't make your dreams come true, at least for me :)
Click to expand...

Well for me it has made life easier. I came from a relatively poor upbringing. Not dead poor, but not well off by a stretch. At least now my family and I can live comfortably. Of course, at 36, I am still paying off my $140K in student loans etc...

I have my other hobbies that make my life full, where medicine fails. For all the career is enjoyable, it has its downfalls.

Peace.


orphia nay said:
T.A.M., good work.

I had an idea for an internet quiz that would involve a lot of similar questions, and would give you an assessment of your stance and recommendations for further reading (& medication :) (?)).

I wonder if we have any programming experts who could rig up something like that.
Click to expand...

Orphia:

It was actually the form you produced in another thread that inspired me to develop the questions. 99% of the truthers are so predictable that it just make sense to have wrote answers and forms to use with them...lol

TAM:)
 
Beachnut: Its odd hey, I find that CTers hit this point where they can either disband their 'beliefs' and actually become smarter and more knowledgable about many a thing in life, or they stay at a specific point, refusing their inquisitive mind to dare to change. Kind of similar to the white picket fence religious goon out there.
 
Topic #6 - The Pentagon
-------------------------

Q2. The Pentagon is the headquarters for the military of the most powerful nation in the world. With regards to the protection around said building, prior to 9/11, which do you believe to be true?

(A) The Pentagon was protected by batteries of hidden ground to air missile launchers.
(B) The Pentagon was protected by a squadron of fighter jets that do not have to take orders from NORAD/NEADS, and take orders only from the USG admin.
(C) The Pentagon is located in a highly populated city, and is located near the flight pathes of hundreds of civilian planes flying in and out of Washington DC. As a result, there was no extra protection for the Pentagon beyond military soldiers.
(D) The Pentagon was/is protected by multiple "Star Wars" type energy/microwave beam weapons.
(E) Other (Please explain).

TAM:)
 
Topic #6 - The Pentagon
-------------------------

Q3. Recently some have suggested that multiple witnesses have testified that they saw a large plane fly on the North side of the Citgo Station near the Pentagon just prior to the explosion there on 9/11. Which of the following best describes how you feel about this new claim?

(A) I think that the witnesses are remembering incorrectly, or were cohersed, and that AA77 flew to the south of the Citgo station just prior to hitting the Pentagon.
(B) I think that the witnesses are remembering incorrectly, or were cohersed, and that a plane flew to the south of the Citgo station, but it then flew over the Pentagon, dropping in a missile to cause the explosion and damage we saw on TV.
(C) I think that the witnesses are remembering incorrectly, or were cohersed, and that a plane, not likely AA77, flew to the south of the Citgo station just prior to hitting the Pentagon.
(D) I believe the witnesses and there testimony are valid and accurate, and that this earth shattering evidence proves conclusively that 9/11 was an "inside job".
(E) I think that the witnesses are remembering incorrectly, or were cohersed, and that there was no plane near the Citgo station or near the Pentagon on 9/11. The Pentagon was hit by a remotely launched cruise missile.
(F) Other (please explain).

TAM:)
 
Childlike, do you feel Mindless Hand Puppet, 28th Kingom, or any of these idiots have a point?

Please, for the love of Ed, say no!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom