9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

[9/11-investigator]

New revisionist video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka-NSHqOn_E

Increased audio-visual sophistication in presenting the revisionist case.
Small sign of things to come.

 

[Saggy]

New revisionist video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka-NSHqOn_E

Increased audio-visual sophistication in presenting the revisionist case.
Small sign of things to come.

Even better, the video presents the pro-Nazi case. It is completely verboten to even imagine in the west that the Nazis were anything but evil manifest. How can this be that in a society that prides itself in freedom of expression, rational discourse, democratic govt., etc., it is possible to demonize another nation to this level?

The first thing is to create the image on evil in academia and the media. Done. Second, repeat it incessantly. Done.

Third, prevent rational discussion. Thus, any questioning of Nazi evil is completely excluded from academia, the media, etc.

Then, more to the point here, on the rare occasion when the subject is raised, the establishment agents attempt to shout it down with idiocy, vulgarity, etc., as we see repeatedly on this forum.

 

[Craig4]

New revisionist video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka-NSHqOn_E

Increased audio-visual sophistication in presenting the revisionist case.
Small sign of things to come.

Wow, even with better production you are still a bunch of irrelevant cranks.

 

[Craig4]

Even better, the video presents the pro-Nazi case. It is completely verboten to even imagine in the west that the Nazis were anything but evil manifest. How can this be that in a society that prides itself in freedom of expression, rational discourse, democratic govt., etc., it is possible to demonize another nation to this level?

The first thing is to create the image on evil in academia and the media. Done. Second, repeat it incessantly. Done.

Third, prevent rational discussion. Thus, any questioning of Nazi evil is completely excluded from academia, the media, etc.

Then, more to the point here, on the rare occasion when the subject is raised, the establishment agents attempt to shout it down with idiocy, vulgarity, etc., as we see repeatedly on this forum.

Some of us call that defending the truth.

Questioning the holocaust is excluded from academia because there's no case to be made for it.

 

[BNRT]

Even better, the video presents the pro-Nazi case. It is completely verboten to even imagine in the west that the Nazis were anything but evil manifest. How can this be that in a society that prides itself in freedom of expression, rational discourse, democratic govt., etc., it is possible to demonize another nation to this level?

The Nazi's were not a nation, they were a political party that incidentally had control over a nation. I guess most people have nothing against Germans. Heck, some of my friends are German.

Third, prevent rational discussion. Thus, any questioning of Nazi evil is completely excluded from academia, the media, etc.

Then, more to the point here, on the rare occasion when the subject is raised, the establishment agents attempt to shout it down with idiocy, vulgarity, etc., as we see repeatedly on this forum.

I have seen some rational discussion(s) on other forums about the gunning of shipwrecked survivors by U-boat captains in WW2. Only one confirmed incident and that captain was punished by the Nazis. It seems your generalisation is refuted.

 

[twinstead]

Saggy, there's a reason why your ideas are met with such universal vitriol, but it's not even close to the reason you think.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Some of us call that defending the truth.

Questioning the holocaust is excluded from academia because there's no case to be made for it.

When was it ever tried? Never.

American judge van Roden confirmed that almost all German defendants testicles were kicked 'beyond repair', signed statements in English and were subjected to court proceedings carried out by the victors of the war. Any sane person would reject such a procedure. But hey, were are dealing with Anglos here in stead, that is our former run away colony that completely got out of hand and even came back to rape mother Europe with the ugliest criminal America could find: the USSR.

Fortunately the designers of the holo-strategy never foresaw the rise of the internet that connects every computer on the planet, completely circumventing the media monopoly these holo-designers once enjoyed. And apart from the silly West, a suicidal political entity that will not exist for another 10 years, the rest of the world could not care less about this sob story, that is dead in the water. In 1980 every East-European was a communist, in 1990 only a few diehards. Will not be different with the H-word.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Saggy, there's a reason why your ideas are met with such universal vitriol, but it's not even close to the reason you think.

It is the same vitriol people felt in the middle ages in regards to heretics: nobody likes when a confortable belief system is shattered. You have my sympathy, but that is about it you will get from me.

 

[Dogzilla]

None of us likes to be reminded of the holocaust at all, but you seem obsessed to keep pushing your lies, so we respond.

Yeah, I built monuments and museums and establish national days of remembrance for things I want to forget all the time.

 

[uke2se]

Yeah, I built monuments and museums and establish national days of remembrance for things I want to forget all the time.

I've never built a museum or monument, nor have I established a national day of remembrance.

There's a difference between wanting to remember and having to remember. We need to remember the holocaust because it serves as a lesson of what humans are capable of. What people like you did to the Jews and gypsies and handicapped and all the others stand as a testament to evil, and it's important that we remember that.

On the other hand, nobody likes to remember it. It's an ugly mark on history, and if it wasn't so dangerous, I would guess that most people would sooner forget it happened than to relive it in memory day after day. As long as there are people like you around - pushing your hatred and your denial of history - we can never forget that it did happen.

 

[dafydd]

Even better, the video presents the pro-Nazi case. It is completely verboten to even imagine in the west that the Nazis were anything but evil manifest. How can this be that in a society that prides itself in freedom of expression, rational discourse, democratic govt., etc., it is possible to demonize another nation to this level?

The first thing is to create the image on evil in academia and the media. Done. Second, repeat it incessantly. Done.

Third, prevent rational discussion. Thus, any questioning of Nazi evil is completely excluded from academia, the media, etc.

Then, more to the point here, on the rare occasion when the subject is raised, the establishment agents attempt to shout it down with idiocy, vulgarity, etc., as we see repeatedly on this forum.

Shalom.

 

[9/11-investigator]

There's a difference between wanting to remember and having to remember. We need to remember the holocaust because it serves as a lesson of what humans are capable of. What people like you did to the Jews and gypsies and handicapped and all the others stand as a testament to evil, and it's important that we remember that.

Note that uke2se does not mention what people like him did
- in the Gulags, the ultimate consequence of egalitarian thinking
- in Nuremberg, where they projected their own crimes on those who tried to liberate humanity from bolshevism.

We should never forget talking about the holocaust, humanities implementation of the ultimate Big Lie.

 

[uke2se]

Note that uke2se does not mention what people like him did
- in the Gulags, the ultimate consequence of egalitarian thinking
- in Nuremberg, where they projected their own crimes on those who tried to liberate humanity from bolshevism.

We should never forget talking about the holocaust, humanities implementation of the ultimate Big Lie.

I've never been an apologist for the crimes of Stalin or the Soviet Union, even though the Lying Dutchman likes to pretend I have. He is a Nazi-apologist though.

It's amusing to watch him attempt to switch the subject when he's entering territory he knows he'll get trounced in.

 

[9/11-investigator]

I've never been an apologist for the crimes of Stalin or the Soviet Union

Of course not, that would mean intellectual suicide.

I said that you studiously avoid the subject and try to put all the stigmatization on Germany and completely ignore what they were up against and that it were these criminals who 'spoke justice' on Germany, an absurd situation.

Anyone who accepts the results of Nuremberg is an apologist of the crimes of Stalin or the USSR.

There's no need to personalize the argument.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: kmortis

 

[Think_Tank]

Anyone who accepts the results of Nuremberg is an apologist of the crimes of Stalin or the USSR.

False dichotomy. Both sides committed crimes. Acknowledging one does not mean that you must deny the other. Deal with it.

 

[uke2se]

Of course not, that would mean intellectual suicide.

It would also be a lie, as I find the Stalinist regime in the Soviet Union absolutely loathsome, on par with Hitler.

So, why did you say this was "my kind of people", when it evidently isn't?

I said that you studiously avoid the subject and try to put all the stigmatization on Germany and completely ignore what they were up against and that it were these criminals who 'spoke justice' on Germany, an absurd situation.

I am simply following this thread's topic. A free hint for you: the topic of this thread is the holocaust. Not the crimes of Stalin. I am not avoiding anything. If you want to start a new thread about the horrors of the Soviet Union, you won't find me apologizing for them there. As it is, you are here, being all apologetic for the Nazis. That's the difference between you and me. I find both dictators awful. You dislike one and love the other.

Anyone who accepts the results of Nuremberg is an apologist of the crimes of Stalin or the USSR.

No, that's simply illogical. However, if it helps you sleep at night, Nazi.

ETA: Have you managed to get over the fact that your beloved Nazi Germany was allied with your hated Stalin yet? It must irk you to have this pointed out time and again, so I will keep obliging.

 

[Wroclaw]

Fritz Berg is an unrepentant Nazi and Jew-hater. Nothing he says is worth taking seriously. Furthermore, he doesn't know dick about science.

 

[Shangrila]

It is the same vitriol people felt in the middle ages in regards to heretics: nobody likes when a confortable belief system is shattered. You have my sympathy, but that is about it you will get from me.

Strange then how you seem to think the vitriol people felt in the Middle Ages in regards to Jews signifies something quite the opposite.

 

[9/11-investigator]

It would also be a lie, as I find the Stalinist regime in the Soviet Union absolutely loathsome, on par with Hitler.

Baloney. Until the start of the war in 1939 Hitler had killed hundreds (with many of his own party members). Stalin and his henchmen had already killed millions. They are incomparable. Prove me wrong.

So, why did you say this was "my kind of people", when it evidently isn't?

Mwoah, you started using the phrase "your kind of people"... you are a neobolshevik, meaning trying to unite the world under one ideology. Just replace 'class enemy' with 'racist' and we have your ideology captured. The 3rd world is your new proletariat. Your ideology will bring the US down just, like bolshevism in the end auto-destroyed Russia. Total equality as a principal will kill any society.

ETA: Have you managed to get over the fact that your beloved Nazi Germany was allied with your hated Stalin yet? It must irk you to have this pointed out time and again, so I will keep obliging.

Germany was never 'allied' with Stalin, start reading about history. A non-agression agreement is not an alliance. Britain, US and USSR, they were real allies, meaning fighting against a common enemy, including giving each other material support, a fact of eternal shame to the Anglos.

 

[dudalb]

Baloney. Until the start of the war in 1939 Hitler had killed hundreds (with many of his own party members). Stalin and his henchmen had already killed millions. They are incomparable. Prove me wrong.



Mwoah, you started using the phrase "your kind of people"... you are a neobolshevik, meaning trying to unite the world under one ideology. Just replace 'class enemy' with 'racist' and we have your ideology captured. The 3rd world is your new proletariat. Your ideology will bring the US down just, like bolshevism in the end auto-destroyed Russia. Total equality as a principal will kill any society.


Germany was never 'allied' with Stalin, start reading about history. A non-agression agreement is not an alliance. Britain, US and USSR, they were real allies, meaning fighting against a common enemy, including giving each other material support, a fact of eternal shame to the Anglos.

There are not enough Picard Facepalms in the universe to convey the idiocy of the above, the bolded sentence in particular.