• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sven is an Aryan name alright, maybe his father was Jewish buth that doesn't make him a Jew according to jewish laws. Or he is of Polish descent. Who knows.But it seams that you are already impressed of a guy who is doing the press releases is Jewish. :D

And yet, by your loved Furher's definition, he would have been Jew enough to get murdered, are you trying to move the goalposts?
He was not just doing the press release, he was the engineer being interviewed, generally, this role falls on the project leader.

Not that it is really important, like Alexandre Dumas, it is just another example of reality not fitting in your little model.


Uhh, Simon, it doesn't matter how many people are busy in research. It is far more interesting how many results these researchers are achieving and how the are transformed into real world products that people want to buy. And than all over sudden the UK looks miserably


Latest export figures:

Country........Export....(population base)
------------------------------------------------
1. Germany....1500B $............. (80M)
2. China........1430B..............(1300M)
3. US - 1300B.........................(400M)
4. Japan - 782B......................(150M)
5. Netherlands - 634B...............(16M)

Maybe in number of researchers (mainly in 'defense'), but not in the results in a Darwinian environment like world markets.

A simple addition shows that Germany + Holland (2 fine 'Aryan' nations) with only 96M people lead the rest of the pack by a street length.
I am curious what Simon's response is going to be on this one.


My answer? That it is retarded.
What is important in fact, is the number of publications and their impact factor, which was what the article I linked to was about.

Industry as little to do with Research, unless you focus on high tech produces, of which, Japan and the U.S are being prime producers.

Are you trying to shift the goalposts a second time? Leave them alone!


I also noticed how you used wrong and inflated figures. Inflated only in the places they would be bolstering your claim...



You are a joke.
You are not just in denial over the Holocaust, your whole vision of history and the contemporary world is delusional.
I guess that part of this is cognitive dissonance, but, obviously, you are not above actively making **** up.

You are not here to honestly discuss anything and you are certainly not here to learn or risk challenging your beliefs, you are just here to get your jollies on, trying to imagine yourself as being a modern day Schutzstaffel and these online scuffles is as close as you'll ever get, considering that you are too cowardly to do anything in real life...
Yeah... a bad joke and a waste of time.
 
Last edited:
What is important in fact, is the number of publications and their impact factor, which was what the article I linked to was about.

The number of publications is irrelevant, relevant is the quality of these papers. Relevant is indeed the 'impact factor', meaning the transformation of ideas into exportable products and services. Britain does not score very high with that and neither does the US having huge shortages on their import/export balance for years now.

Industry as little to do with Research, unless you focus on high tech produces, of which, Japan and the U.S are being prime producers.

Apart from software and 'defence', the US is not a prime producer of high tech. Germany is high tech exporter nr 1 in the world.
 
Apart from software and 'defence', the US is not a prime producer of high tech. Germany is high tech exporter nr 1 in the world.

Software and 'defence' are high-tech. It's like saying "except bread, meat and dairy Germany is #1 food exporter". Pathetic.
 
The number of publications is irrelevant, relevant is the quality of these papers. Relevant is indeed the 'impact factor', meaning the transformation of ideas into exportable products and services. Britain does not score very high with that and neither does the US having huge shortages on their import/export balance for years now.


I am done arguing with the delusional ignoramus (certainly that'll mean 'he won'), just wanted to point out his ignorance of the subject he is talking about.
 
Hmmm.

So, Black (or non-White generally) people being poorer and less powerful than Whites proves Whites' intellectual superiority, and is evidence that White people should lord over non-Whites.

Therefore, Jews being richer and more powerful than non-Jewish Whites (a LOT richer, according to the neo-Nazis, who think Jews practically own and control everything) is evidence of Jews' intellectual superiority, and is evidence that Jews should lord over non-Jews.

Which, according to the neo-Nazis, they do.

So what's the problem?

:con2:

Things are as they should be.
 
Last edited:
Hmmm.

So, Black (or non-White generally) people being poorer and less powerful than Whites proves Whites' intellectual superiority, and is evidence that White people should lord over non-Whites.

Therefore, Jews being richer and more powerful than non-Jewish Whites (a LOT richer, according to the neo-Nazis, who think Jews practically own and control everything) is evidence of Jews' intellectual superiority, and is evidence that Jews should lord over non-Jews.

I think the argument goes something like: the Jews don't produce anything, but rather get everything they have by manipulation, deception, and being middlemen, so everything they have is because of leeching off of others. Power gained via leeching doesn't count as true power, because once the non-Jewish whites all realize they're being leeched they'll turn on the Jews, and the Jews being outnumbered and having no power of their own will be easily defeated.
 
I think the argument goes something like: the Jews don't produce anything, but rather get everything they have by manipulation, deception, and being middlemen, so everything they have is because of leeching off of others. Power gained via leeching doesn't count as true power, because once the non-Jewish whites all realize they're being leeched they'll turn on the Jews, and the Jews being outnumbered and having no power of their own will be easily defeated.

Actually, I think the argument is that the Jews, having gotten their wealth by using their brains, rather then by brainless brute force as befits an Aryan superman, disqualify themselves from being superior. Because, as we have seen, Nazis aren´t exactly the cream of the intellectual crop, and stupid people are usually paranoid about smart people.
 
Hitler's adjutants who were eye-witnesses told the Plaintiff that on the night of the November 1938 'Kristallnacht' (Night of Broken Glass) Hitler spent the whole night intervening with Heinrich Himmler [picture], Joseph Goebbels, the police chief of Munich von Eberstein, and others to quell the pogrom that Goebbels had mischievously started.

This is the line that David Irving has tried to sell. Unfortunately it is refuted by historians, most completely by Richard Evans in his expert report to the court during Irving's attempt to censor Deborah Lipstadt in Britain.

You can read it in the report to be found on the Holocaust Denial On Trial website.
 
So, Black (or non-White generally) people being poorer and less powerful than Whites proves Whites' intellectual superiority, and is evidence that White people should lord over non-Whites.

Who says Whites wants to 'lord over non-Whites'? No thanks, been there, done that. 'The White man's Burden' is soo 19th century. Just keeping them at a distance will do, thank you. Here is some data for Skeptic to learn something. Rest assured, this data is kosher, a lot of Jews do this kind of research as well.
Edited by Tricky: 
Corrected misspelling of Skeptic's name.


(Uhoh, look at Israel: IQ94, that's disappointing!)

For anybody with a sorry excuse for a brain understands that there is a strong correlation between the Wealth of a Nation and the IQ-level of it's population. Except of course for people with an agenda.

Therefore, Jews being richer and more powerful than non-Jewish Whites ... is evidence of Jews' intellectual superiority, and is evidence that Jews should lord over non-Jews.

This is what Skeptic really thinks himself, but he cannot admit that, so he wraps his statement in a bit of irony.

On the other hand, I have to admit that since the Europeans were thrown out of Rhodesia (once the Breadbasket of Africa) things have improved considerably. Everybody is a milionair now in Zimbabwe. America is going to be the next country of millionairs. You see, you cannot stop progress.
Do not intentionally misspell members' names, especially if it results in an insult.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Tricky
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I referred to Skeptic's name twice, only once there was a mistake, it was a typo. Nevertheless I got a yellow card, the third (when does one get banned?). Again, although I do my best to avoid provoking these kind of actions, it is obvious that I am a pain in the neck here so I have to reckon to get banned on a minor issue at any moment, certainly now people are chickening out of the holocaust-discussion for the fear of being defeated. Again, you can find me back on ThePhora under the nick 9/11-investigator once that happens and celebrate that moral victory.

Oh yes, Bollyn is about the reveal who produced the nano-thermite. It were Israeli scientist, no surprises here. Things are heatening up, it all will come crashing down soon. Thank God the American population is armed to the teeth.
 
Last edited:
This is what Skeptic really thinks himself, but he cannot admit that, so he wraps his statement in a bit of irony.

'What he is saying is not what he means?'

Come on, you can do better than that.
 
911-Investigator: You have made several references to the United States either being a cause of your discontent or possibly defending against what you perceive to come. Please leave us out of your meanderings. While it is true that a very small number of people share your phobia of Jews, non-Christians, brown people, etc.; they are inestimably small. The make-up of our country is changing, as it always has, from English to Scots to Irish to Italian to German to Polish to Asian to Hispanic. It continues to do so. Don’t worry about us, we’ll be fine.
 
911-Investigator: You have made several references to the United States either being a cause of your discontent or possibly defending against what you perceive to come. Please leave us out of your meanderings. While it is true that a very small number of people share your phobia of Jews, non-Christians, brown people, etc.; they are inestimably small. The make-up of our country is changing, as it always has, from English to Scots to Irish to Italian to German to Polish to Asian to Hispanic. It continues to do so. Don’t worry about us, we’ll be fine.

I don't worry at all, with my feet on the table I am waiting for events to unfold.

But you are wrong, I hold majority views. A clear majority of the Euro-Americans want to see immigration restricted. Europeans likewise.

http://www.zogby.com/NEWS/readnews.cfm?ID=1100
http://www.npg.org/immpoll.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom