Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
Pardon Our Dust,
or,
Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters

by Michael Green,
April 20, 2009

Author's Bio: I am a retired forensic psychologist living in Los Angeles with enough time on my hands to have spent the past few years studying the deeds whose perpetrators pejoratively deride the correct analysis of which as "conspiracy theories," i.e., USG intelligence community domestic covert operations - fascist politics by unconventional means. A professor of analytic philosophy in a former career, I no longer embrace the Lotus Land argument that if you can work on your abs, then it isn't fascism.

http://911review.com/articles/green/PardonOurDust.html
Click to expand...

You spew spam of insane delusions. Good job you found another failed dolt who spews idiotic ideas you accept as evidence. You are are a dumb idea magnet; perfect cult member for 911Truth where thinking is optional and could be the cure for falling for the idiotic ideas you post.

More political claptrap.

http://911review.com/articles/green/PardonOurDust.html If the Towers and Building 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition, then these vastly complicated acts were coordinated through the security apparatus of the World Trade Center in conjunction with high-ranking members of the U.S. military, especially the Air Force, whose cooperation was required to assure that the commercial airplanes hit their targets
Click to expand...
I was on active duty on 911 this terrorist loyalist is apologizing for his murdering friends and wants to blame me.

Your failure to understand 911 makes you the perfect follower and repeater of lies and delusions. What is your next post of moronic claptrap?
 
bill smith said:
I must say that the supporters of the bush administration attacks on 9/11 seem far more concerned about the numbers of Truth Movement people than the Truth Movement people themselves. I mean look at this forum- how many of you guys are there to stop a dozen or so Truthers from making a case ? Would it be as many as three hundred ?....maybe five hundred ?

Obviously there would be no need for any of you guys if we were not here. I reckon we are fighting odds of at least twenty to one. And not having too many problems either.

Maybe you need to recruit some more manpower ?
Click to expand...

The bush administration

is so last year.
 
beachnut said:
You spew spam of insane delusions. Good job you found another failed dolt who spews idiotic ideas you accept as evidence. You are are a dumb idea magnet; perfect cult member for 911Truth where thinking is optional and could be the cure for falling for the idiotic ideas you post.

More political claptrap.

I was on active duty on 911 this terrorist loyalist is apologizing for his murdering friends and wants to blame me.

Your failure to understand 911 makes you the perfect follower and repeater of lies and delusions. What is your next post of moronic claptrap?
Click to expand...

Maybe you should sue him Beachnut on behalf of the USAF.Then we could make a great big 9/11 court case. Sound like an idea ? lol
 
Not naming names...but posting a bunch of links and not offering input is, at best, a breach of netiquette and, at worst, a breach of forum rules. Nobody likes a spambot bill smith. If you want to discuss one of your links, do a forum search and bump the relevant thread.
 
apathoid said:
Not naming names...but posting a bunch of links and not offering input is, at best, a breach of netiquette and, at worst, a breach of forum rules. Nobody likes a spambot bill smith. If you want to discuss one of your links, do a forum search and bump the relevant thread.
Click to expand...
This is a general discussion thread. If you want to discuss a specific topic that might pop up you are free to start a new thread or join an existing one on that subject. It's not complicated.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Pre-9/11 Upgraded GPS Service Provided 243 Foot Wide Aerial Navigation Corridors

Amended Version of Journal of 9/11 Studies Paper


Enhanced GPS service (WAAS) now in use by the U.S. commercial aviation industry and activated 13 months prior to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, provided virtual aerial navigation corridors only 243 wide and a 95% confidence that an aircraft's true position will fall within such a corridor . Such corridors can be navigated entirely by autopilot and flight management systems scheduled in 1996 and 1998 to be contained by United and American airlines Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft like those used during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19970
Click to expand...


There are so many things wrong with just this paragraph, I'd hate to have to read the "paper". If the FAA has already started using GPS(WAAS/LAAS) for ATC, this is the first I've heard about it. Besides, I've been over this umpteen times, it's not clear that any of the 9/11 aircraft had GPS. The only one that may have had it was United 93(N591UA), as it was a newer airplane. But the other were delivered pre-GPS and right in the midst of the GPWS mod run and before the GPS mod run. Sorry bill, this one is rubbish.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
This is a general discussion thread. If you want to discuss a specific topic that might pop up you are free to start a new thread or join an existing one on that subject. It's not complicated.
Click to expand...


You weren't discussing, you were spamming. There is a difference.
 
bill smith said:
Maybe you should sue him Beachnut on behalf of the USAF.Then we could make a great big 9/11 court case. Sound like an idea ? lol
Click to expand...
He is an idiot, you like his ideas, it is a free country to be fooled by idiots. You are allowed to believe nut case ideas and spew them at will; you have the right to be as anti-intellectual as you can be.

You post tripe about 911; do you lack the knowledge to know you are posting lies and delusions?

You don't discuss you spam this forum with the dumbest stuff on 911 you can find. You have great skills for posting junk and not having anything to add. You make an excellent cult member, a follower who post the word given to you by 911Truth, you don't waste time thinking about it you just post junk that is false and delusional.

spam
 
apathoid said:
There are so many things wrong with just this paragraph, I'd hate to have to read the "paper". If the FAA has already started using GPS(WAAS/LAAS) for ATC, this is the first I've heard about it. Besides, I've been over this umpteen times, it's not clear that any of the 9/11 aircraft had GPS. The only one that may have had it was United 93(N591UA), as it was a newer airplane. But the other were delivered pre-GPS and right in the midst of the GPWS mod run and before the GPS mod run. Sorry bill, this one is rubbish.
Click to expand...

Well unless you have some documentation on that we will have to assume that the question is still open.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Well unless you have some documentaton on that we will have to assume that the question is still open.
Click to expand...
The GPS junk you posted from 911blogger is pure junk and you have no clue.

Back up the story with some facts if you have them; but you don't understand anything about 911 you only have what the idiots at 911Truth spoon feed you with.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Well unless you have some documentation on that we will have to assume that the question is still open.
Click to expand...


No, I am not providing any. If you don't care enough to do 5 minutes of basic research, which would disprove the very first sentence in your article, why should I be bothered?
 
bill smith said:
This is a general discussion thread. If you want to discuss a specific topic that might pop up you are free to start a new thread or join an existing one on that subject. It's not complicated.
Click to expand...
bill smith said:
Rubbish. I was posting relevent general information on 9/11 and responded to any takers. More is not required.
Click to expand...


You forgot about the whole discussion part already, didn't you?
 
bill smith said:
Pre-9/11 Upgraded GPS Service Provided 243 Foot Wide Aerial Navigation Corridors

Amended Version of Journal of 9/11 Studies Paper


Enhanced GPS service (WAAS) now in use by the U.S. commercial aviation industry and activated 13 months prior to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, provided virtual aerial navigation corridors only 243 wide and a 95% confidence that an aircraft's true position will fall within such a corridor . Such corridors can be navigated entirely by autopilot and flight management systems scheduled in 1996 and 1998 to be contained by United and American airlines Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft like those used during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19970
Click to expand...


So what? Nobody needed GPS to find the WTC towers on the morning of 9/11/2001. The Hudson River was the only navigation aid necessary.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom