HahahahahaDoes that make the people who give them attention, "attention Johns?"
I'm just sayin....
HahahahahaDoes that make the people who give them attention, "attention Johns?"
I'm just sayin....
Well the missile battery would have shot eggs at it or a new straight jacket, take your pick.In other words, they can't even convince the TM that the cuckoo flew over the cuckoo's nest.
As its been mentioned in several threads, no doubt many of you have seen Craig’s “open letter to the 9/11 Truth movement,” which the CIT boys have been spamming at numerous web sites.
The CIT boys promise a soon to be released “free” resource that can be further spammed “to the media and authorities in an efficient and professional package so stay tuned for that.”
The open letter, of course, gives primacy to CIT’s North of Citgo theory, while deriding the efforts of other Truthers. Craig says, “Obviously this endless debate about a false claim has served their purposes perfectly causing people to chase their tails while over-looking the hard evidence that has been uncovered in the mean time.”
I think that we can say that a fair summary of that sentiment is that Craig thinks other truthers are idiots. Hey Craig, we finally agree on something!
Interestingly, I noted this on the Loose Change Board, once one of the most active truther Boards around, and now a miasma of “ChemTrails” and fourth rate Woo. What is ironic is that the Loose Change boys are perhaps the leading “idiots” to which Craig is referring.
Of course, don’t take my word for it, old Aldo whacks old Jason Bermas for not bending to the CIT will. When asked about one of the LC boys talking about “drones hitting the pentagon,” Aldo replied:
“Yeah that is uneffingbelievable.
Jason bases this on what? What research or evidence helped him reach that conclusion? I can assure you that I know of a supporter who called into his show and asked why he doesn't talk about or focus on our stuff, and he was like "yeah they do some good work buuuuut..." and then went on with whatever BS he needed to say to justify why we just don't have enough proof.
I think we need to arrange a call or debate with Jason.
In fact, I think it is time we start calling some people up and calling them out.
What are these ******* people NOT getting?”
Thanks Craig, thanks Aldo! Look for a delivery of a new NWO rope ladder for the Tree Fort, soon.
Full time 7 days a week fun.
Right
As its been mentioned in several threads, no doubt many of you have seen Craig’s “open letter to the 9/11 Truth movement,” which the CIT boys have been spamming at numerous web sites.
The CIT boys promise a soon to be released “free” resource that can be further spammed “to the media and authorities in an efficient and professional package so stay tuned for that.”
The open letter, of course, gives primacy to CIT’s North of Citgo theory, while deriding the efforts of other Truthers. Craig says, “Obviously this endless debate about a false claim has served their purposes perfectly causing people to chase their tails while over-looking the hard evidence that has been uncovered in the mean time.”
I think that we can say that a fair summary of that sentiment is that Craig thinks other truthers are idiots. Hey Craig, we finally agree on something!
Interestingly, I noted this on the Loose Change Board, once one of the most active truther Boards around, and now a miasma of “ChemTrails” and fourth rate Woo. What is ironic is that the Loose Change boys are perhaps the leading “idiots” to which Craig is referring.
Of course, don’t take my word for it, old Aldo whacks old Jason Bermas for not bending to the CIT will. When asked about one of the LC boys talking about “drones hitting the pentagon,” Aldo replied:
“Yeah that is uneffingbelievable.
Jason bases this on what? What research or evidence helped him reach that conclusion? I can assure you that I know of a supporter who called into his show and asked why he doesn't talk about or focus on our stuff, and he was like "yeah they do some good work buuuuut..." and then went on with whatever BS he needed to say to justify why we just don't have enough proof.
I think we need to arrange a call or debate with Jason.
In fact, I think it is time we start calling some people up and calling them out.
What are these ******* people NOT getting?”
Thanks Craig, thanks Aldo! Look for a delivery of a new NWO rope ladder for the Tree Fort, soon.
I'm not sure exactly why, but this whole "north of citgo" stuff really really bores me.
yah, kind of like abstract art looks ridiculous to most sensible people.
(sorry to all the abstract artists, but it is true)
TAM![]()
Wow is there anything that they do that you don't miss? Are you their biggest fan?
Oh that's right you just do this just because it's so much fun making fun of truthers. So much fun.
Full time 7 days a week fun.
Right
bumped, as it may soon be the only thread not gone to AAH by sunrise.
TAM![]()

yah, kind of like abstract art looks ridiculous to most sensible people.
(sorry to all the abstract artists, but it is true)
TAM![]()
yah, kind of like abstract art looks ridiculous to most sensible people.
(sorry to all the abstract artists, but it is true)
TAM![]()
Miss the point much, HI? You don't think it notable that the No Planers at the Pentagon are slamming their co-truthers?
I mean, Aldo isn't even hiding it anymore. Cripes, he rips Loose Change on the Loose Change board:
"There are several errors in the first 2 editions. So I wouldn't show them those.
If you are looking to provide actual hard hitting evidence, then you may want to take a look at the eyewitnesses we interviewed.
ThePentaCon.com"
It is difficult to convince others of the need for a"new investigation," is it not, when Truthers mock each others' theories
In any event, if you have something substantive to add, please do so. There is always a first time! Of course, strangely enough your response was significantly more substantive than Aldo's, who went to the old reliable "16.5's mom" response. Serious investigators, ^^rolls eyes^^
gee Red, I dunno whether you are being particularly foul, or if there is some subtle sarcasm in there that I am not, at this hour, getting.
TAM![]()