Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
ULTIMA1 said:
Well from all your prior post [sic] i knew you would not beleive [sic] me, so i posted an actual explanation.
Click to expand...

How were we supposed to know this was an actual explanation? You never gave a citation and left the reader to assume it was your own words. Honest people don't do that. Neither do people who already know what they are talking about.

But why are you copying others [sic] work. [sic] You cannot find evidence on your own?
Click to expand...

When do I copy other people's work?


Jonnyclueless said:
dtugg, it's unlikely he even knew what it meant without looking it up.
Click to expand...

Oh, I know. I just think it is funny messing with him.
 
Last edited:
dtugg has never been told anything by the media let alone repeated it.

But I do see the many lemmings repeating what they have been told by their 9/11 cult youtube videos.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Oh sorry i forgot you cannot look things up yourself.
Click to expand...

So every time you say something, I should assume that you just stole it from somebody and google it to see for sure?

Everytime [sic] you repeat what the media has told you happened on 9/11.
Click to expand...

Stop blabbering. You don't know what you are talking about. Mentioning a CNN interview where a pilot tells them an American Airlines 757 that flew into the Pentagon, for example, is not copying anybody's work.
 
Every time you repeat what the media has told you happened on 9/11.
Click to expand...
Why not doing some new research if you d'ont believe instead of harassing us with your vacuous posts?
 
I know you wanted a general dumping thread, but if you can't keep it above the level of bickering and incivility, the thread will be moved to AAH. You can't use it (or people's profile messages, btw) as an excuse to get personal and uncivil.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
dtugg said:
So every time you say something, I should assume that you just stole it from somebody and google it to see for sure?


NO, i will post the link. Like i usually do. But you should be able to look simple things up.

When are you going to post something with a link to a source? Something you researched yourself?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
NO, i will post the link. Like i usually do. But you should be able to look simple things up.

When are you going to post something with a link to a sourc? [sic] Something you researched yourself?
Click to expand...

Why didn't you post the link about the thing in question? Did you just conveniently forget?

If I post something that is exactly the same as something that somebody else wrote, I will provide a citation.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Then how does he know what happened if he does not do research?

Someone had to tell him.
Click to expand...

Oh I see. So any information other than what you say is "being told" and of course as you imply wrong. So everything ever reported on anything is wrong? Please elaborate on this. Because you are implying he is wrong based on his sources, and thus all the sources are wrong. Care the back this up?
 
what would constitute a real source? And how does any source "tell him" anything? What's an example of a source you use that isn't "telling you" something?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I am looking for sources that were researched he can post.

I have never seen him psot [sic] any real sources.
Click to expand...

Most of it is in my head from reading all sorts of different things. If asked to give a source for anything, I could do it.

I definitely don't copy things word for word like you do without giving a source though.
 
dtugg said:
If asked to give a source for anything, I could do it.
Click to expand...

Well i have been asking for sources. Please post the websites you use.

I have most of my sources at hand on a couple of CDs.
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
Well i have been asking for sources. Please post the websites you use.

I have most of my sources at hand on a couple of CDs.
Click to expand...

If you want a source for a specific thing, I will give it. I've read many different websites, books, articles, ect. on the subject and really don't care enough to list them all for you.
 
dtugg said:
If you want a source for a specific thing, I will give it. I've read many different websites, books, articles, ect. on the subject and really don't care enough to list them all for you.
Click to expand...

Ok so list your sources for the research of how the towers collapsed.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Thats [sic] it? So you just believe everything NIST says?
Click to expand...

It's only a 10,000 page report (probably the largest engineering report ever) by hundreds of experts in the field. And there has been no credible refutation of their major findings. Yes, I believe it.

What about they [sic] fact they failed to recover steel for testing from building 7?
Click to expand...

My understanding is that they couldn't determine from where in the building the steel came from, so there was no point in using it.

But they didn't need it to figure out what happened. And definitely not to determine that the controlled demolition theory is stupid.
 
Taken from another thread as to not further derail.

ULTIMA1 said:
Well for 1 i have the FDR data from AA77 and it agrees with what the police officers witnessed.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that Flight 77 flew into the Pentagon. Not that it went north of the CITGO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom