Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
He asked if signals intellgence was its primary task. Is it or isn't it?

ULTIMA1 said:
One more time for the people who have a hard time reading.

YES, BUT THEY ALSO DO MORE.


Then, when gumboot stated, earlier,

The NSA is a signals intelligence organisation. Their job is to intercept communication of interest.

why did you reply, in your typical wit, with

Well i see you know nothing about NSA at all. Thanks for proving that point.

?
 
Last edited:
One more time for the people who have a hard time reading.

YES, BUT THEY ALSO DO MORE.


This was your first evasive answer to the question, "Are claiming that the NSA's PRIMARY task is not signals intelligence?"
Well yes it does signals intelligence but it does more then just that.

So who has the hard time reading? (and spelling) Oh that would be you.
 
A twoofer called me "military scum" yesterday. Lovely.

And overnight, he has said, "we will destroy you. I promise."

A moderator has called him on his threat, and told him to apologise. I'm not holding my breath, but I'm also not going to bother with him anymore. He's despicable, and deserves to wallow in fear, misunderstanding and paranoia.
 
A twoofer called me "military scum" yesterday. Lovely.

And overnight, he has said, "we will destroy you. I promise."

A moderator has called him on his threat, and told him to apologise. I'm not holding my breath, but I'm also not going to bother with him anymore. He's despicable, and deserves to wallow in fear, misunderstanding and paranoia.

Cripes... nothing like keyboard courage. You must've been winning the debate, if all he could do was resort to insults.

Well, then again, just showing up with common sense usually wins the debate... :)
 
A moderator has called him on his threat, and told him to apologise. .


Gee if i did that for all the believers that threatened me or called me names the mods would never get anythig else done but telling them to apologize.
 
Gee if i did that for all the believers that threatened me or called me names the mods would never get anythig [sic] else done but telling them to apologize.

You have threatened to tell the mods on me several times. They have said nothing to me.

By the way, why again did you plagiarize an encyclopedia which quotes a book written in 1985 to explain what a CRITIC is? If you really worked as an intelligence analyst, it would be simple for you to explain in your own words. I think you are a liar, liar.
 
Last edited:
What - no date tonight? Over 100 posts in almost 7 hours.

There's a lot of 9/11 investigating that could've been done.
 
Last edited:
Well yes it does signals intelligence but it does more then just that.


Yes I know, they also do signals security, but that's hardly relevant to intelligence they might have gathered in relation to an intercept of UA93.
 
Gee if i did that for all the believers that threatened me or called me names the mods would never get anythig else done but telling them to apologize.

If you did what? Report him? I didn't report him - the forum doesn't have a report function. The moderator warned him of her own free will.

It was nothing to do with calling me names. He's said much worse that's gone unnoted.

I just thought the "military scum" comment was worthy of note, since normally twoofers love to pretend (IMHO) that they support the troops.
 
Last edited:
NO sorry thats [sic] your speciallty, [sic] (as i have cpmplained [sic] to the mods about) i was doing research.

Hey ULTIMA, since you are here, why again did you plagiarize an encyclopedia which quotes a book written in 1985 to explain what a CRITIC is? If you really worked as an intelligence analyst, it would be simple for you to explain in your own words. I think you are a liar, liar.
 
Last edited:
Hey ULTIMA, since you are here, why again did you plagiarize an encyclopedia which quotes a book written in 1985 to explain what a CRITIC is? .


Well you answered your own question, to explain what a CRITIC is?

Since i know you guys have a hard time with this stuff i thought i would gove you a good explanation.

Now why do you guys plagiarize the media for evidence?
 
Well you answered your own question, to explain what a CRITIC is?

Since i know you guys have a hard time with this stuff i thought i would gove [sic] you a good explanation.

Now why do you guys plagiarize the media for evidence?

So you couldn't give a good explanation in your own words? Therefore, you stole somebody's work?

You don't even know what plagiarize means. Name one time that I have copied somebody's work without giving a credit. I dare you.
 
So you couldn't give a good explanation in your own words? Therefore, you stole somebody's work?

Well from all your prior post i knew you would not beleive me, so i posted an actual explanation.

Name one time that I have copied somebody's work

But why are you copying others work. You cannot find evidence on your own?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom