He asked if signals intellgence was its primary task. Is it or isn't it?
One more time for the people who have a hard time reading.
YES, BUT THEY ALSO DO MORE.
He asked if signals intellgence was its primary task. Is it or isn't it?
He asked if signals intellgence was its primary task. Is it or isn't it?
ULTIMA1 said:One more time for the people who have a hard time reading.
YES, BUT THEY ALSO DO MORE.
The NSA is a signals intelligence organisation. Their job is to intercept communication of interest.
Well i see you know nothing about NSA at all. Thanks for proving that point.
One more time for the people who have a hard time reading.
YES, BUT THEY ALSO DO MORE.
Well yes it does signals intelligence but it does more then just that.
A twoofer called me "military scum" yesterday. Lovely.
And overnight, he has said, "we will destroy you. I promise."
A moderator has called him on his threat, and told him to apologise. I'm not holding my breath, but I'm also not going to bother with him anymore. He's despicable, and deserves to wallow in fear, misunderstanding and paranoia.
A moderator has called him on his threat, and told him to apologise. .
Gee if i did that for all the believers that threatened me or called me names the mods would never get anythig [sic] else done but telling them to apologize.
Well yes it does signals intelligence but it does more then just that.
Gee if i did that for all the believers that threatened me or called me names the mods would never get anythig else done but telling them to apologize.
Then, when gumboot stated, earlier,
why did you reply, in your typical wit, with
What - no date tonight? Over 100 posts in almost 7 hours.
There's a lot of 9/11 investigating that could've been done.
Yes I know, they also do signals security, but that's hardly relevant to intelligence they might have gathered in relation to an intercept of UA93.
in a word?
trolling![]()
NO sorry thats [sic] your speciallty, [sic] (as i have cpmplained [sic] to the mods about) i was doing research.
Hey ULTIMA, since you are here, why again did you plagiarize an encyclopedia which quotes a book written in 1985 to explain what a CRITIC is? .
Well you answered your own question, to explain what a CRITIC is?
Since i know you guys have a hard time with this stuff i thought i would gove [sic] you a good explanation.
Now why do you guys plagiarize the media for evidence?
So you couldn't give a good explanation in your own words? Therefore, you stole somebody's work?
Name one time that I have copied somebody's work