Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
ULTIMA1 said:
Oh, his usual misquotes and changing my quotes.
Click to expand...

I didn't change anything you said, genius. I was just asking a question.

If someone like you actually does work for the NSA as an intelligence analyst, I am afraid for the safety of my country.

EDIT: nevermind, I misread what you said sorry.
 
Last edited:
Mince said:
But you said you did. If you say something, do you not expect that people will believe you?
Click to expand...

Do you mean like belivers stating they know what happened that day but do not have any evidence to suport it?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Oh, his usual misquotes and changing my quotes.
Click to expand...

Ah, so, now in retreat mode, you are suggesting a moderator at ATS altered your post to attribute to you a quotation that you did not make?
 
Last edited:
Mince said:
Ah, so, now in backtrack mode, you are suggesting a moderator at ATS altered your post to attribute to you a quotation that you did not make?
Click to expand...


LOL.. gavron was not a moderator.

In fact he was very close to being banned also.
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
Do you mean like belivers stating they know what happened that day but do not have any evidence to suport it?
Click to expand...

No, I mean like you posting on ATS that you are talking to a lawyer because a moderator there was biased and didn't have a reason for banning you.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread340137/pg5
ULTIMA1 at ATS said:
Also please tell your MOD buddy at Eb that i am talking to a lawyer about him being biased and not haing a reason for banning me.
Click to expand...

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread340137/pg5
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
LOL.. gavron was not a moderator.

In fact he was very close to being banned also.
Click to expand...

Oh, ok. The way you phrased it sounded like you were accusing Gavron of altering your actual quotations within your posts. It is now clear that you claim he was altering your quotations in his own posts. It is sometimes difficult to decipher your posts.

Well, if nobody altered your actual posts at ATS, we're left with this:

ULTIMA1 at ATS said:
Also please tell your MOD buddy at Eb that i am talking to a lawyer about him being biased and not haing a reason for banning me.
Click to expand...

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread340137/pg5
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
Well its my business on another forum. Grow up and get over it.
Click to expand...

Oh, I'm over it. I appreciate your (eventual) honesty in admitting you made the quotation (kind of hard to deny).

Don't worry about it; it happens.
 
bonavada said:
^ Unashamedly plagarised from HERE


Why the need to cut and paste the words of someone else? Seems you need help to describe things that should be common knowledge as a super duper NSA MIB.
If you're NSA then I'm the Popes lovechild.

BV
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1, would you care to explain why you had to plagiarize an encyclopedia article which cites a book written in 1985 to explain what a CRITIC is? After all if you were really an NSA intelligence analyst, you would know exactly what a CRITIC is and would be able to explain it in your own words.
 
dtugg said:
ULTIMA1, would you care to explain why you had to plagiarize an encyclopedia article which cites a book written in 1985 to explain what a CRITIC is? After all if you were really an NSA intelligence analyst, you would know exactly what a CRITIC is and would be able to explain it in your own words.
Click to expand...

He would have been ok but for the article's omission of spelling errors and inclusion of capitalization. Oh, and the article was articulately written.
 
dtugg said:
ULTIMA1, would you care to explain why you had to plagiarize an encyclopedia article which cites a book written in 1985 to explain what a CRITIC is? After all if you were really an NSA intelligence analyst, you would know exactly what a CRITIC is and would be able to explain it in your own words.
Click to expand...

It was just trying to give you an explanation of what it was. I was trying to make it simple for you, since i know you guys have a hard time with this stuff.

Woud you care to explan why you plagiarize the media ? Is it becaue you do not have any real evidence?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
LOL.. gavron was not a moderator.

In fact he was very close to being banned also.
Click to expand...

Actually, you are very wrong. As a matter of fact, I was corresponding with mods using U2U messages....and contact a couple offline a lot.

I'd post those messages, but of course you wouldnt believe them.

See, some people actually do make friends on the forums. Maybe its because I didnt call them childish and immature. :p
 
ULTIMA1 said:
It was just trying to give you an explanation of what it was. I was trying to make it simple for you, since i know you guys have a hard time with this stuff.
Click to expand...

I appreciate your concern for me and my inadequate comprension skills, but I believe, and for good reason, all members of this forum are required to cite references they post, where applicable. Not doing so is morally wrong and violates the membership agreement.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
It was just trying to give you an explanation of what it was. I was trying to make it simple for you, since i know you guys have a hard time with this stuff.

Woud [sic] you care to explan [sic] why you plagiarize the media ? Is it becaue [sic] you do not have any real evidence?
Click to expand...

So instead of giving a simple explanation in your own words, which should be really easy given your supposed job, you stole the work of somebody else?

I don't think that you even know what plagiarism is. I have never posted word for word something that came from the media, or anyone else, without giving a citation.

PS: From now on, whenever I quote you, I am going to point out any spelling errors you make. That is what the [sic] is, if you couldn't figure it out.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom