Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

[ULTIMA1]

Are you suggesting that the NIST NCSTAR is the "official story"?

Well most believers think that NIST reports are the bible, and believe whatever the NIST reports state.

But the NIST final report states it was a combination of impact and fire. Other reports disagree, and state it was fire alone that casued the collapse.

 

[dtugg]

You definitely do not have the critical thinking skills required to be an NSA intelligence analyst, liar.

 

[ULTIMA1]

You definitely do not have the critical thinking skills required to be an NSA intelligence analyst, liar.

Well i have proven you wrong though havn't i? Remember the GGD payscale?

How many more times do i need to prove you wrong?

 

[applecorped]

Don't you have real work to do somewhere?

 

[GStan]

Well most believers think that NIST reports are the bible, and believe whatever the NIST reports state.

But the NIST final report states it was a combination of impact and fire. Other reports disagree, and state it was fire alone that casued the collapse.

The reports all agree that there were planes that crashed into the Towers.
They all agree that the planes did damage.
They all agree that the were fires following the impacts.
They all agree that the fires further weakened an already weakened structure.

The details of the exact mechanisms that initiated the collapse sequence is one of those minor details that professionals who know what they are talking about (i.e. NOT you), continue to discuss.

For the love of cheese, my five year old son could construct a better argument than this. Make it at least challenging enough to be interesting.

 

[ULTIMA1]

on't you have real work to do somewhere?

FUNNY, I come on here and most of you guys have been in here posting. Do any of you guys have jobs?

 

[dtugg]

Well i have proven you wrong though havn't i? Remember the GGD payscale?

How many more times do i need to prove you wrong?

The pay scale doesn't mean anything, I was wrong about that. And mentioning that, doesn't it suck to be only the same as GS9 after working for the government for some 25 years or so? Or at least it would suck if you weren't just lying about the whole thing.

You are still no NSA intelligence analyst. Liar.

If you were you would have taken the "challenge" of taking picture of you holding your badge. We already know what "you" look like and what "your" name is so it isn't even that big a deal. If you do that, we will all shut up. But you won't because you are a liar and do not work for the NSA as an intelligence analyst. Do it and make as us skeptics look like fools. I dare you, liar.

 

[ULTIMA1]

They all agree that the planes did damage.

But most reports agree there was mininmal damage not enough to contribute to the collapse.

They all agree that the were fires following the impacts.

But since since most agree the jet fuel burned off quickly all you had was a normal office fire.

They all agree that the fires further weakened an already weakened structure.

See above, according to most reports the planes impacts did not casue much damage.

The details of the exact mechanisms that initiated the collapse sequence is one of those minor details that professionals who know what they are talking about (i.e. NOT you), continue to discuss.

But then why do beleivers all seem to believe the NIST reports?

 

[Athyrio]

...........But then why do beleivers all seem to believe the NIST reports?

Why does that make any difference to you?

 

[applecorped]

FUNNY, I come on here and most of you guys have been in here posting. Do any of you guys have jobs?

Shhhh! Most of us are on the NWO payroll. You know, spreading disinfo and such. We monitor people like yourself and spread gratuitous lies in an attempt to supress the REAL truth.

Oh, don't tell anybody.

 

[applecorped]

.
But since since most agree the jet fuel burned off quickly all you had was a normal office fire.

Normal?

Yikes!

 

[ULTIMA1]

The pay scale doesn't mean anything, I was wrong about that.

Just as you are wrong about a lot of things but are too childish to admit it.

If you were you would have taken the "challenge" of taking picture of you holding your badge.

If you were not childish you would have accepted my challenge but you knew you would have to leave thats why you failed to accept my LES.

Do it and make as us skeptics look like fools. I dare you,

Why so you can come up with more excuses not to accept it. You have proven that you are a coward and a liar when you failed to accept facts shown.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Why does that make any difference to you?

Because ther are lots of other reports and articles that disagree with the NIST reports.

 

[Athyrio]

Because ther are lots of other reports and articles that disagree with the NIST reports.

No, what I mean is - why should a person who is on a self appointed mission to seek the "truth" of 9/11 and crack the case - why should that person be concerned about what various people on a message board believe about it?

And furthermore - why should that person be wasting their valuable investigative time here dilly-dallying when it's been 7 years already? You're letting the case get colder, aren't you?

 

[ULTIMA1]

No, what I mean is - why should a person who is on a self appointed mission to seek the "truth" of 9/11 and crack the case - why should that person be concerned about what various people on a message board believe about it?

I am trying to get people to wake up and think for themsleves, do some research.

And furthermore - why should that person be wasting their valuable investigative time here dilly-dallying when it's been 7 years already? You're letting the case get colder, aren't you?

I have been doing research, FOIA requests and e-mails to find the truth and posting it for people.

 

[Quad4_72]

Because ther are lots of other reports and articles that disagree with the NIST reports.

Name one article that has been endorsed by a respected scientific journal that does not agree with NIST's findings. Oh and POST YOUR BADGE.

 

[Athyrio]

I am trying to get people to wake up and think for themsleves, do some research.



I have been doing research, FOIA requests and e-mails to find the truth and posting it for people.

By now you should be able to realize the futility of that endeavor and you would be more advised to double your efforts at "research, FOIA requests, and e-mails" by not wasting any more time here. You agree?

 

[ULTIMA1]

Name one article that has been endorsed by a respected scientific journal that does not agree with NIST's findings.

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html

Oh and POST YOUR BADGE.

Are you going to leave the forum when i do?

 

[ULTIMA1]

By now you should be able to realize the futility of that endeavor and you would be more advised to double your efforts at "research, FOIA requests, and e-mails" by not wasting any more time here. You agree?

I have plenty of good resources that i can do both research and post the information on forums.

 

[dtugg]

Why so you can come up with more excuses not to accept it. You have proven that you are a coward and a liar when you failed to accept facts shown.

If you do this, I will shut forever about you being a liar.

You have shown zero facts, in your 852 posts here.

The documents that you claim prove you identity are most likely your dad's. If you did as I ask, it would assure me this is not the case.